Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000652.SZ Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling Group Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling Group Co., Ltd. Class A000652.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors
Momentum weak 34
Mkt cap
$683M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.68M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-3.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥3.12
1D-1.3%
1W+3.0%
1M-6.0%
3M-12.8%
6M-27.3%
YTD-25.0%
1Y-28.3%
ATR %2.4%
52w lowhigh36.6% off high

What Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling does

Employees: 1,915

Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling at a glance

Size Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling (000652.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $683M, the 3121st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥3.12 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 27.3%, against -5.1% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 66.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.8%); the operating margin is 2.8% (peer median 5.3%).

Valuation It trades at 4.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.1× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.7 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95000652.SZ 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥6.33BCN¥17.8BCN¥19.0BCN¥21.1BCN¥20.2B
Revenue growth—-6%-10%+4%—
Gross profitCN¥1.12BCN¥853MCN¥553MCN¥1.32BCN¥1.30B
EBITDAn/aCN¥848MCN¥450MCN¥1.01BCN¥1.22B
Net income-CN¥305M-CN¥286MCN¥114MCN¥183MCN¥178M
Free cash flow-CN¥1.12B-CN¥1.26B-CN¥284M-CN¥342M-CN¥536M
Capital expenditureCN¥583MCN¥442MCN¥415MCN¥715MCN¥947M
Total debtCN¥22.8BCN¥26.1BCN¥24.4BCN¥24.5BCN¥20.8B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%6033530013166000846010618117MMGR-BTHEPSGLLV6883200013769824DBM815960332581259832ADENMTGACOMO000652.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%-25%0%+25%2×4×6033530013166000846010618117MMGR-BTHEPSGLLV6883200013769824DBM8159603325600279000652.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling is the large dot.

Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling competitors and peer comparison

How Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000652.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.0%-3.4%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-27.3%-5.1%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-36.6%-20.0%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-66.2%+6.8%lowest of 21
Operating margin2.8%5.3%5th lowest of 21
EV / Sales4.2×1.1×2nd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.7 pp+0.4 pp4th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling 000652.SZChina$683M-27%-66%3%4.2×n/an/a
Hunan Heshun Petroleum 603353.SSChina$684M-38%-10%-2%1.7×n/an/a
Lubair Aviation Technology 001316.SZChina$672M-25%+32%20%2.9×-0.8%+11.0%
CITIC Niya Wine 600084.SSChina$701M-22%+5%-17%28.2×n/an/a
CITIC Metal 601061.SSChina$706M-32%+19%1%0.1×-22.1%+13.0%
Central Automotive Products 8117.TJapan$716M+7%+14%24%1.7×-3.4%+11.1%
Momentum MMGR-B.STSweden$650M+14%+6%10%2.2×3.8%+21.2%
Thermador Groupe THEP.PAFrance$646M-9%+8%12%1.0×-2.4%+4.9%
Ricegrowers SGLLV.AXAustralia$730M+24%-2%6%0.7×-4.4%+12.0%
Zhejiang He Chuan Technology 688320.SSChina$638M-15%+45%-10%3.7×n/an/a
Jiangxi Bestoo Energy 001376.SZChina$734M-34%+10%22%3.8×-2.1%+17.4%
Senshu Electric 9824.TJapan$736M+17%+13%7%0.5×-5.1%+12.8%
Doman Building Materials DBM.TOCanada$633M-1%+2%5%0.6×2.0%+14.1%
Tachibana Eletech 8159.TJapan$629M+43%+10%4%0.4×3.0%+7.1%
Shanghai Bloom Technology 603325.SSChina$628M-19%-34%14%3.2×n/an/a
Chongqing Port 600279.SSChina$744M-14%+9%5%2.0×1.5%-2.5%
Wakita & 8125.TJapan$621M+4%+4%6%1.0×0.1%+4.7%
Autobacs Seven 9832.TJapan$758M+1%+9%5%0.5×n/an/a
ADENTRA ADEN.TOCanada$610M+2%+1%4%0.6×-0.4%+20.3%
Meier Tobler MTG.SWSwitzerland$610M+41%+2%4%1.1×5.5%+0.4%
Acomo ACOMO.ASNetherlands$765M-13%-3%7%0.7×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hunan Heshun Petroleum (603353.SS), Lubair Aviation Technology (001316.SZ), CITIC Niya Wine (600084.SS), CITIC Metal (601061.SS), Central Automotive Products (8117.T), Momentum (MMGR-B.ST), Thermador Groupe (THEP.PA), Ricegrowers (SGLLV.AX).
Is Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 4.2× against a peer median of 1.1×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -27.3% against -5.1% for the median peer; over one year -28.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.