Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600007.SS China World Trade Center Company Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

China World Trade Center Company Ltd. Class A600007.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Real Estate›Real Estate Development

Owns and operates the China World Trade Center complex in Beijing, leasing offices, a hotel and retail space.

≈ A Beijing landlord like a Chinese Rockefeller Center operatorMomentum leader 93
Mkt cap
$3.31B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
140 days
26 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥21.90
1D+0.1%
1W-1.4%
1M+5.8%
3M+15.3%
6M+4.3%
YTD+10.5%
1Y+6.4%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh3.9% off high

What China World Trade Center does

Owns and operates the China World Trade Center complex in Beijing, leasing offices, a hotel and retail space.

Earns rent from office and shop tenants on multi-year leases, plus room, restaurant and event income from the hotel, which moves with travel and business activity. Everything rests on one complex in Beijing's central business district, so occupancy and rents there decide results.

In one line: A Beijing landlord like a Chinese Rockefeller Center operator.

Products and services

  • Office leasing
  • Hotel operations
  • Retail mall leasing

Customers

  • Corporate office tenants
  • Hotel guests
  • Retail tenants

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Real estate
  • Commercial property operation
  • Office, hotel and retail leasing

What could go right

  • Beijing CBD office/hotel demand recovery

What could go wrong

  • Office vacancy/rent softness
  • Single-asset concentration

Moat: narrow (brand, installed base). Prime, irreplaceable Beijing CBD location with an established international-tenant reputation.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 1985 · Employees: 1,754

Named competitors

China World Trade Center at a glance

Size China World Trade Center (600007.SS) is a China Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $3.31B, the 783rd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥21.90 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.3%, against -8.8% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 3.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.0%); the operating margin is 42.0% (peer median 20.2%).

Valuation It trades at 18.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.5× (8th cheapest of 16).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026600007.SS 103Peer median 93
Six months, rebased to 100: China World Trade Center against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

China World Trade Center financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.64BCN¥3.75BCN¥3.89BCN¥3.93BCN¥3.43B
Revenue growth—-4%-1%+15%—
Gross profitCN¥2.41BCN¥2.15BCN¥2.24BCN¥2.26BCN¥1.92B
EBITDAn/aCN¥2.02BCN¥2.14BCN¥2.18BCN¥1.88B
Net incomeCN¥1.23BCN¥1.20BCN¥1.26BCN¥1.26BCN¥1.12B
Free cash flowCN¥1.59BCN¥1.49BCN¥1.74BCN¥1.87BCN¥1.76B
Capital expenditureCN¥56.2MCN¥76.3MCN¥68.3MCN¥66.0MCN¥70.3M
Total debtCN¥39.6MCN¥242MCN¥1.12BCN¥1.62BCN¥2.13B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China World Trade Center competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-10%0%+10%+20%HGVCWK600208UTGPNDX-BMOBN0683U06600095VTMX2602ALLNTQ5JOEMRP00002909606002461908600606600007.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China World Trade Center is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%20×40×60×HGVCWK600208UTGPNDX-BMOBN0683600095VTMXALLNTQ5MRP1908600606600007.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China World Trade Center is the large dot.

China World Trade Center competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (600007.SS vs 600376.SS vs 000402.SZ vs 601588.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
China World Trade Center 600007.SS$3.31B+4%-4%42%18.6×n/a
Beijing Capital Development 600376.SS$1.04B-41%-35%-15%n/an/a
Financial Street 000402.SZ$991M-30%-38%-26%n/an/a
Beijing North Star 601588.SS$683M-22%-12%-21%n/an/a
Shanghai Lujiazui Finance & Trade Zone Development 600663.SS$4.81B-10%-21%21%14.0×n/a

How China World Trade Center compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China World Trade Center against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600007.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+5.8%+3.8%9th highest of 21
6-month return+4.3%-8.8%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-3.9%-22.7%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-3.7%+6.0%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin42.0%20.2%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E18.6×19.5×8th cheapest of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China World Trade Center 600007.SSChina$3.31B+4%-4%42%18.6×n/an/a
Hilton Grand Vacations HGVUnited States$3.33B-10%+19%17%9.4×n/an/a
Cushman & Wakefield CWKUnited States$3.28B-2%+10%4%8.8×n/an/a
Quzhou Xin'an Development 600208.SSChina$3.25B-43%-4%-17%52.0×n/an/a
UNITE UTG.LUnited Kingdom$3.41B+5%+12%46%11.9×n/an/a
Pandox PNDX-B.STSweden$3.43B-1%+15%58%14.6×n/an/a
Mobimo MOBN.SWSwitzerland$3.17B-1%+15%42%26.9×n/an/a
Kerry Properties 0683.HKHong Kong$3.47B-26%-22%24%14.2×n/an/a
Singapore Land U06.SISingapore$3.08B-25%+4%36%n/an/an/a
Xiangcai 600095.SSChina$3.07B-19%-3%12%26.5×n/an/a
Corporacion Inmobiliaria Vesta S.A.B. de C.V. Sponsored ADR VTMXUnited States$3.62B+6%+18%76%19.5×n/an/a
Onewo 2602.HKHong Kong$2.84B+6%+8%3%20.6×n/an/a
Allreal ALLN.SWSwitzerland$3.89B-8%+3%41%24.0×n/an/a
Frasers Property TQ5.SISingapore$2.80B-20%-21%29%26.8×n/an/a
St. Joe JOEUnited States$3.96B+6%+11%32%n/an/an/a
Millrose Properties MRPUnited States$4.00B-4%+93%85%7.9×n/an/a
Shenzhen Special Economic Zone Real Estate and Properties (Group) 000029.SZChina$2.73B-6%-24%14%n/an/an/a
Longfor 0960.HKHong Kong$4.05B-47%-42%1%n/an/an/a
Vantone Neo Development 600246.SSChina$2.69B-14%+22%-152%n/an/an/a
C&D International Investment 1908.HKHong Kong$4.11B-15%-15%7%8.2×n/an/a
Greenland 600606.SSChina$2.66B-20%-30%-12%63.0×n/an/a

Questions

Who are China World Trade Center's main competitors?
Named competitors: Beijing Capital Development (600376.SS), Financial Street Holdings (000402.SZ), Beijing North Star (601588.SS), Shanghai Lujiazui Finance & Trade Zone Development (600663.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hilton Grand Vacations (HGV), Cushman & Wakefield (CWK), Quzhou Xin'an Development (600208.SS), UNITE (UTG.L), Pandox (PNDX-B.ST), Mobimo (MOBN.SW).
Is China World Trade Center expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.6× against a peer median of 19.5×, 8th cheapest of 16 in its peer set.
How has China World Trade Center stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.3% against -8.8% for the median peer; over one year +6.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.