Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000402.SZ Financial Street Holdings Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Financial Street Holdings Co., Ltd. Class A000402.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Real Estate›Real Estate Development

Develops and operates Beijing's Financial Street business district, leasing offices to banks alongside residential development.

≈ A Chinese Canary Wharf developer/landlordMomentum weak 21
Mkt cap
$991M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
49%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$18.9M
20-day average traded
P/B
0.34×
price to book
ROE
-20.5%
delivered
Implied ROE
4.6%
what the price asks
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥2.21
1D-0.9%
1W+2.8%
1M-17.2%
3M-12.3%
6M-30.3%
YTD-19.6%
1Y-30.5%
ATR %3.6%
52w lowhigh36.7% off high

What Financial Street does

Develops and operates Beijing's Financial Street business district, leasing offices to banks alongside residential development.

Rents offices in the district to banks, insurers and other financial firms on multi-year leases, a steady income alongside residential development, which brings lumpier revenue from home sales as projects are completed and handed over. A local-government-owned investment group controls it.

In one line: A Chinese Canary Wharf developer/landlord.

Products and services

  • Office property leasing
  • Residential property development
  • Hotel operations

Customers

  • Banks and financial-institution tenants
  • Homebuyers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Real estate
  • Commercial office development/leasing
  • Residential development

What could go right

  • Financial-sector office demand

What could go wrong

  • Office vacancy/rent softness
  • Residential sales downturn

Moat: narrow (brand, installed base). Owns and operates Beijing's premier financial-district office cluster, hard to replicate.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 1997 · Employees: 1,867

Named competitors

Financial Street at a glance

Size Financial Street (000402.SZ) is a China Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $991M, the 2314th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥2.21 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 30.3%, against -20.3% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 38.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.1%); the operating margin is -26.0% (peer median 1.3%).

Valuation It trades at 0.34× book value against a peer median of 1.32× (cheapest of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 4.6%; Financial Street delivers -20.5%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 80000402.SZ 63
Six months, rebased to 100: Financial Street against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Financial Street financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥8.42BCN¥7.98BCN¥19.0BCN¥12.5BCN¥20.4B
Revenue growth—-58%+52%-39%—
Gross profitCN¥1.64BCN¥809MCN¥519MCN¥862MCN¥3.13B
EBITDAn/a-CN¥2.81B-CN¥6.82B-CN¥859MCN¥1.21B
Net income-CN¥4.38B-CN¥5.38B-CN¥11.1B-CN¥1.95BCN¥846M
Free cash flowCN¥1.09BCN¥2.11BCN¥6.01BCN¥6.28BCN¥5.77B
Capital expenditureCN¥60.6MCN¥28.9MCN¥27.4MCN¥56.6MCN¥105M
Total debtCN¥68.7BCN¥75.3BCN¥70.0BCN¥72.3BCN¥78.7B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Financial Street competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%+10%002077WEWORK600643FRMI01086001588803002208OYY600724600748000560DVL600376HMC600510600736MMIMERYGLF000402.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Financial Street is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-200%-100%0%00×1000×2000×002077WEWORK600643OYYDVL600376000402.SZReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Financial Street is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%500%1,000%1,500%2,000%0%1,000%2,000%002077WEWORK600643OYY600376000402.SZROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Financial Street is the large dot.

Financial Street competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (000402.SZ vs 600007.SS vs 600376.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Financial Street 000402.SZ$991M-30%-38%-20%0.34×4.6%
China World Trade Center 600007.SS$3.31B+4%-4%13%2.29×13.3%
Beijing Capital Development 600376.SS$1.04B-41%-35%-197%237.80×1,928.7%

How Financial Street compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Financial Street against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000402.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-17.2%-8.2%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-30.3%-20.3%10th lowest of 21
Return on equity-20.5%1.8%2nd lowest of 20
Price / book0.34×1.32×cheapest of 21
ROE the price implies4.6%15.3%least demanding of 21
ROE delivered-20.5%1.5%2nd lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Financial Street 000402.SZChina$991M-30%-38%-20%0.34×4.6%-20.5%
Jiangsu Dagang 002077.SZChina$983M-32%+24%2%1.92×12.9%1.8%
WeWork India Management WEWORK.NSIndia$1.00B+26%+25%36%27.81×324.8%36.3%
Shanghai AJ 600643.SSChina$1.00B-12%-41%-16%0.66×6.2%-15.7%
Fermi FRMIUnited States$1.01B-70%n/an/a0.97×16.5%n/a
SR Medical Technology 0108.HKHong Kong$972M-10%+25%-18%7.50×20.3%-17.8%
China Sports Industry 600158.SSChina$1.01B-41%0%-8%2.81×16.0%-7.9%
Heiwa Real Estate 8803.TJapan$964M-6%+23%9%1.21×5.4%9.1%
Hefei Urban Construction Development 002208.SZChina$961M-42%-14%-10%1.10×16.1%-10.0%
PropNex OYY.SISingapore$956M-9%+8%56%9.86×97.2%55.5%
Ningbo Fuda 600724.SSChina$956M-37%-18%6%2.23×14.7%6.4%
Shanghai Industrial Development 600748.SSChina$952M-35%-3%-3%0.63×5.9%-3.0%
5I5J 000560.SZChina$1.03B-2%-21%0%0.73×7.4%-0.3%
Develia DVL.WAPoland$947M-26%+70%33%1.91×18.4%33.1%
Beijing Capital Development 600376.SSChina$1.04B-41%-35%-197%237.80×1,928.7%-197.2%
HMC Capital HMC.AXAustralia$946M+17%-27%1%0.89×12.9%1.2%
Black Peony (Group) 600510.SSChina$1.04B-37%-24%-5%0.71×9.9%-4.8%
Suzhou New District Hi-Tech Industrial 600736.SSChina$934M-34%-30%4%0.59×5.2%3.8%
Marcus & Millichap MMIUnited States$1.05B-9%+12%2%1.82×17.8%2.4%
Mercialys MERY.PAFrance$1.05B-15%+3%5%0.60×7.7%5.1%
Gemlife Communities GLF.AXAustralia$1.05B-9%+8%5%1.43×18.0%n/a

Questions

Who are Financial Street's main competitors?
Named competitors: China World Trade Center (600007.SS), Beijing Capital Development (600376.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Jiangsu Dagang (002077.SZ), WeWork India Management (WEWORK.NS), Shanghai AJ (600643.SS), Fermi (FRMI), SR Medical Technology (0108.HK), China Sports Industry (600158.SS).
Is Financial Street expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 0.34× against a peer median of 1.32×, cheapest of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 4.6%; Financial Street delivers -20.5%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Financial Street stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -30.3% against -20.3% for the median peer; over one year -30.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.