Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 5289.TWO Innodisk Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Innodisk Corp.5289.TWOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Computer Peripherals

Taiwanese maker of industrial-grade flash storage and DRAM modules for embedded systems in aerospace, medical, networking and industrial equipment.

≈ An industrial-grade counterpart to Transcend, built for embedded systems not consumersMomentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$2.76B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$50.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
2.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+65.2 pp
WACC 8.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · TWDNT$928.00
1D-1.8%
1W-17.1%
1M-28.3%
3M-33.1%
6M-34.6%
YTD+61.1%
1Y+119.6%
ATR %7.1%
52w lowhigh54.2% off high

What Innodisk does

Taiwanese maker of industrial-grade flash storage and DRAM modules for embedded systems in aerospace, medical, networking and industrial equipment.

Sells industrial-grade storage and memory that makers of medical, networking and industrial equipment design into their systems, which keeps products in production for years rather than the short life of consumer parts. Customers pay for tested, long-supply-life parts, and the company has widened into edge-computing and AI modules.

In one line: An industrial-grade counterpart to Transcend, built for embedded systems not consumers.

Products and services

  • Industrial SSDs
  • Embedded flash modules
  • Industrial DRAM modules

Customers

  • Aerospace/defense OEMs
  • Medical device makers
  • Networking/industrial equipment makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology hardware
  • Industrial memory & storage
  • Embedded flash/DRAM modules

What could go right

  • Industrial IoT/embedded computing growth

What could go wrong

  • NAND/DRAM price cyclicality

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, process know-how). Long product-lifecycle qualification in industrial/aerospace applications creates high switching costs.

Headquarters: Taipei, Taiwan · Founded: 2005

Named competitors

Innodisk at a glance

Size Innodisk (5289.TWO) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Computer Peripherals) with a market value of $2.76B, the 134th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$928.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 34.6%, against -12.5% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 333.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.6%); the operating margin is 49.0% (peer median 9.7%).

Valuation It trades at 2.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.5× (cheapest of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 65.2 points above its cost of capital (8.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 855289.TWO 63
Six months, rebased to 100: Innodisk against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Innodisk financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$44.2BNT$14.3BNT$8.92BNT$8.31BNT$10.3B
Revenue growth—+60%+7%-19%—
Gross profitNT$25.2BNT$4.41BNT$2.80BNT$2.82BNT$3.43B
EBITDANT$21.9BNT$2.60BNT$1.36BNT$1.55BNT$2.19B
Net incomeNT$17.3BNT$2.04BNT$1.11BNT$1.15BNT$1.85B
Free cash flow-NT$994M-NT$2.51BNT$521MNT$764MNT$2.03B
Capital expenditureNT$302MNT$231MNT$358MNT$707MNT$509M
Total debtNT$9.29BNT$2.29BNT$579MNT$588MNT$531M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Innodisk competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%-20%0%3324VU002439000997ARTOEXTR3260NETWEB2451KARN2377688475600839000050603025238580696038593003025289.TWO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Innodisk is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%0×50×100×150×3324VU0024390009973260NETWEB2451KARN237723856038595289.TWORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Innodisk is the large dot.

Innodisk competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (5289.TWO vs 2451.TW vs 3260.TWO vs 8271.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Innodisk 5289.TWO$2.76B-35%+334%49%2.5×n/a
Transcend Information 2451.TW$3.22B-13%+286%67%3.2×n/a
ADATA Technology 3260.TWO$3.16B-33%+125%34%4.5×n/a
Apacer Technology 8271.TW$655M-28%+182%31%2.1×n/a
Phison Electronics 8299.TWO$10.0B-29%+157%31%3.7×n/a
PENG PENG$2.52B-5%+26%10%9.2×n/a

How Innodisk compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Innodisk against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure5289.TWOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-28.3%-10.1%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-34.6%-12.5%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-54.2%-38.6%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+333.9%+6.6%highest of 21
Operating margin49.0%9.7%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E2.5×16.5×cheapest of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital+65.2 pp+11.3 pp3rd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA4.2×10.6×2nd cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-0.0×-0.5×3rd most indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Innodisk 5289.TWOTaiwan$2.76B-35%+334%49%2.5×n/an/a
AURAS Technology 3324.TWOTaiwan$2.90B-10%+71%16%15.1×n/an/a
VusionGroup VU.PAFrance$2.61B+11%+45%10%16.5×n/an/a
Venustech 002439.SZChina$2.58B-9%0%-16%169.0×19.0%-8.6%
Newland Digital Technology 000997.SZChina$2.56B-14%+29%11%16.0×n/an/a
Societe Industrielle & Financiere de l'Artois ARTO.PAFrance$2.55B-26%-6%-8%n/an/an/a
Extreme Networks EXTRUnited States$3.15B0%+11%6%17.2×27.3%+4.9%
ADATA Technology 3260.TWOTaiwan$3.16B-33%+125%34%4.5×n/an/a
Netweb Technologies India NETWEB.NSIndia$2.37B-12%+175%13%55.9×46.1%+72.5%
Transcend Information 2451.TWTaiwan$3.22B-13%+286%67%3.2×n/an/a
Kardex KARN.SWSwitzerland$2.35B-9%+3%9%30.3×11.8%+12.5%
Micro-Star International 2377.TWTaiwan$3.50B+43%+1%5%11.6×n/an/a
Hangzhou EZVIZ Network 688475.SSChina$3.53B-4%+8%12%30.1×15.7%+13.8%
Sichuan Changhong Electric 600839.SSChina$3.55B-41%+4%0%n/an/an/a
Tianma Microelectronics 000050.SZChina$2.05B-27%-3%-1%29.5×-6.2%+4.4%
Beijing Dahao Technology 603025.SSChina$2.04B-25%+23%29%n/a7.4%+29.2%
Chicony Electronics 2385.TWTaiwan$1.96B-31%-8%7%15.4×-9.6%+0.1%
InfoVision Optoelectronics (Kunshan) 688055.SSChina$1.56B-23%-24%-19%n/an/an/a
E Ink 8069.TWOTaiwan$4.98B+2%-3%29%12.4×-0.3%+18.6%
Nancal Technology 603859.SSChina$1.49B-5%+10%12%42.5×n/an/a
Toyou Feiji Electronics 300302.SZChina$1.49B-24%+5%-15%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Innodisk's main competitors?
Named competitors: Transcend Information (2451.TW), ADATA Technology (3260.TWO), Kingston Technology (private or unlisted), Apacer Technology (8271.TW), Phison Electronics (8299.TWO), Penguin Solutions (SMART Modular) (PENG). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes AURAS Technology (3324.TWO), VusionGroup (VU.PA), Venustech (002439.SZ), Newland Digital Technology (000997.SZ), Societe Industrielle & Financiere de l'Artois (ARTO.PA), Extreme Networks (EXTR).
Is Innodisk expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 2.5× against a peer median of 16.5×, cheapest of 16 in its peer set.
How has Innodisk stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -34.6% against -12.5% for the median peer; over one year +119.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.