Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 8271.TW Apacer Technology Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Apacer Technology Inc.8271.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Computer Peripherals
Momentum weak 25
Mkt cap
$655M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
91%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.61M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
2.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+53.9 pp
WACC 8.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · TWDNT$167.00
1D+4.7%
1W-8.0%
1M-16.7%
3M-25.4%
6M-28.0%
YTD+47.8%
1Y+52.5%
ATR %5.2%
52w lowhigh38.4% off high

What Apacer Technology does

Employees: 41

Apacer Technology at a glance

Size Apacer Technology (8271.TW) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Computer Peripherals) with a market value of $655M, the 358th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$167.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 28.0%, against -12.6% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 181.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.0%); the operating margin is 31.5% (peer median 0.1%).

Valuation It trades at 2.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.7× (cheapest of 13).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 53.9 points above its cost of capital (8.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 858271.TW 69
Six months, rebased to 100: Apacer Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Apacer Technology financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$28.4BNT$11.1BNT$7.84BNT$7.63BNT$8.80B
Revenue growth—+42%+3%-13%—
Gross profitNT$12.8BNT$2.24BNT$1.24BNT$1.72BNT$1.64B
EBITDAn/aNT$1.11BNT$392MNT$792MNT$763M
Net incomeNT$7.07BNT$860MNT$279MNT$553MNT$559M
Free cash flown/a-NT$2.17B-NT$101MNT$348MNT$1.76B
Capital expendituren/aNT$40.5MNT$30.4MNT$37.9MNT$35.9M
Total debtn/aNT$1.70BNT$352MNT$127MNT$169M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Apacer Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%+10%-40%-20%0%PCT3003680030196579300689300656MUB30053130055900236260020349156727QMCO002577300248SSYS002376BLZE54258271.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Apacer Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%0×25×50×75×PCT0030193005313005590023624915QMCO300248SSYS54258271.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Apacer Technology is the large dot.

Apacer Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Apacer Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Apacer Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure8271.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.7%-15.8%11th highest of 21
6-month return-28.0%-12.6%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-38.4%-40.8%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+181.7%+10.0%highest of 21
Operating margin31.5%0.1%highest of 21
Forward P/E2.1×24.7×cheapest of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+53.9 pp-3.4 pphighest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Apacer Technology 8271.TWTaiwan$655M-28%+182%31%2.1×n/an/a
PC Partner PCT.SISingapore$662M+4%+18%7%7.4×n/an/a
Hebei Huijin 300368.SZChina$667M-17%-18%-124%n/an/an/a
TES Touch Embedded Solutions (Xiamen) 003019.SZChina$668M-28%+24%8%20.7×n/an/a
AAEON Technology 6579.TWTaiwan$633M-10%+30%9%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Chengtian Weiye Technology Co 300689.SZChina$679M-27%+19%0%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Minde Electronics Technology 300656.SZChina$681M-13%-14%-60%n/an/an/a
Muhlbauer Holding AG & Co. KGaA MUB.DEGermany$684M+9%+2%7%n/a-4.9%+11.4%
Urovo Technology 300531.SZChina$693M-23%+33%8%22.8×n/an/a
Chengdu Jiafaantai Education Technology 300559.SZChina$602M-26%-26%0%35.5×35.7%-6.0%
Hanwang Technology 002362.SZChina$596M-12%-2%-13%81.8×n/an/a
Fujian Furi Electronics 600203.SSChina$736M-32%+35%0%n/an/an/a
Primax Electronics 4915.TWTaiwan$744M-29%+9%4%10.5×n/an/a
Wacom 6727.TJapan$570M-6%-3%13%9.3×-6.0%+0.3%
Quantum QMCOUnited States$570M+100%+11%0%27.1×n/an/a
Shenzhen Rapoo Technology 002577.SZChina$754M+4%+11%-2%n/an/an/a
Newcapec Electronics 300248.SZChina$567M-17%+1%1%32.0×21.5%+0.9%
Stratasys SSYSUnited States$565M-25%-3%-14%45.9×n/an/a
Shandong New Beiyang Information Technology 002376.SZChina$794M-9%+21%0%n/a23.8%+3.1%
Backblaze BLZEUnited States$523M+10%+17%-4%26.7×12.7%+22.1%
Taiwan Semiconductor 5425.TWOTaiwan$520M+7%+5%9%18.3×7.6%+11.6%

Questions

Which companies are Apacer Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: PC Partner (PCT.SI), Hebei Huijin (300368.SZ), TES Touch Embedded Solutions (Xiamen) (003019.SZ), AAEON Technology (6579.TW), Shenzhen Chengtian Weiye Technology Co (300689.SZ), Shenzhen Minde Electronics Technology (300656.SZ), Muhlbauer Holding AG & Co. KGaA (MUB.DE), Urovo Technology (300531.SZ).
Is Apacer Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 2.1× against a peer median of 24.7×, cheapest of 13 in its peer set.
How has Apacer Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -28.0% against -12.6% for the median peer; over one year +52.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.