Loading…

TISI Inc.3626.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Information Technology›Information Technology Services

Japanese IT services and systems integration company, running enterprise and credit-card processing systems.

≈ A mid-sized Infosys/CognizantMomentum leader 85
Mkt cap
$5.50B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
88%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+13.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
84 days
29 Jan 2027
Close · JPY¥4,116
1D-4.1%
1W-5.4%
1M+2.6%
3M+10.9%
6M+20.5%
YTD-21.7%
1Y-18.3%
ATR %2.9%
52w lowhigh23.8% off high

What TISI does

Japanese IT services and systems integration company, running enterprise and credit-card processing systems.

Earns fees for building and running core systems for banks, card companies and corporate clients, much of it under long outsourcing contracts, so staff billed and contract renewals drive income. Its payments business processes card transactions for issuers and merchants, billed per transaction.

In one line: A mid-sized Infosys/Cognizant.

Products and services

  • Systems integration
  • Payment/credit-card processing systems
  • IT outsourcing/cloud services

Customers

  • Japanese financial institutions
  • Corporate enterprise clients

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • IT services
  • Systems integration & IT outsourcing
  • Enterprise software, payments…

What could go right

  • Japan enterprise digital transformation demand

What could go wrong

  • IT project margin pressure

Moat: narrow (switching costs, customer qualification). Deeply embedded systems (e.g., payment processing) are costly for clients to switch away from.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1971 · Employees: 21,598

Named competitors

TISI at a glance

Size TISI (3626.T) is a Japan Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $5.50B, the 225th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥4,116 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 20.5%, against +11.3% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.9%); the operating margin is 12.8% (peer median 8.4%).

Valuation It trades at 15.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.4× (9th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263626.T 121Peer median 113
Six months, rebased to 100: TISI against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

TISI financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥615B¥596B¥572B¥549B¥508B
Revenue growth—+4%+4%+8%—
Gross profit¥174B¥168B¥160B¥152B¥142B
EBITDA¥97.9B¥94.9B¥88.6B¥85.0B¥78.2B
Net income¥49.8B¥46.6B¥50.0B¥48.9B¥55.5B
Free cash flown/a¥61.3B¥44.9B¥49.5B¥29.3B
Capital expendituren/a¥28.0B¥25.4B¥18.9B¥10.4B
Total debt¥61.4B¥40.5B¥43.5B¥45.1B¥22.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

TISI competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-20%0%+20%307950PEGA064400BOXINGMNICEPSNSAICRIOTBC8KBRCCCTEMNNSIT688702XMTRQTWODOX3626.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. TISI is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×2,000×4,000×6,000×307950PEGA064400BOXINGMPSNCCCTEMN688702XMTRSCT3626.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. TISI is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%307950PEGA064400BOXINGMNICESAICKBRTEMNNSITQTWOSCTDOX23273626.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. TISI is the large dot.

TISI competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3626.T vs 4768.T vs 4307.T vs 6702.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
TISI 3626.T$5.50B+20%+5%13%15.1×-7.7%
Otsuka 4768.T$8.63B+24%+9%7%20.1×-5.6%
Nomura Research Institute 4307.T$20.2B+40%+8%19%26.4×0.7%
Fujitsu 6702.T$35.4B+1%+4%10%18.0×4.1%
BIPROGY 8056.T$2.47B-3%+4%10%13.1×-9.5%
Nec 6701.T$36.3B+5%+7%12%18.6×5.5%

How TISI compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

TISI against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3626.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.6%-1.4%9th highest of 21
6-month return+20.5%+11.3%6th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.8%-24.8%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.2%+8.9%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin12.8%8.4%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E15.1×16.4×9th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.7%5.6%3rd least demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.9%+8.6%7th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-13.6 pp-1.8 pp5th least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.1 pp+4.7 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.7×11.8×4th cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×0.6×8th least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
TISI 3626.TJapan$5.50B+20%+5%13%15.1×-7.7%+5.9%
HyundaiAutoever 307950.KSSouth Korea$5.49B-40%+16%5%35.7×27.6%+22.2%
Pegasystems PEGAUnited States$5.30B-10%+1%12%13.8×8.8%+11.4%
LG Cns 064400.KSSouth Korea$5.29B+14%+4%9%15.5×5.6%+7.2%
Box BOXUnited States$5.76B+63%+10%9%26.0×20.3%+8.8%
Ingram Micro INGMUnited States$5.85B-6%+15%2%6.8×2.9%+1.4%
NICE Ltd. Sponsored ADR NICEUnited States$5.87B+4%+8%17%7.8×-0.7%+12.3%
Parsons PSNUnited States$5.16B-1%-3%5%14.8×8.4%+10.2%
Science Applications International SAICUnited States$6.13B+56%-1%8%14.3×-4.6%+0.6%
RIOT RIOTUnited States$6.27B-31%+6%-84%n/an/an/a
Bechtle BC8.DEGermany$4.72B+13%+8%5%16.8×6.9%+4.9%
KBR KBRUnited States$4.69B+14%-3%9%9.5×-8.7%+6.2%
Computacenter CCC.LUnited Kingdom$6.48B+15%+54%3%16.4×7.9%+11.1%
Temenos TEMN.SWSwitzerland$6.51B+10%+30%27%21.8×8.3%+1.7%
Insight Enterprises NSITUnited States$4.64B+89%+3%6%11.7×2.9%-0.2%
Suzhou Centec Communications 688702.SSChina$6.58B-45%+32%-18%5,922.0×n/an/a
Xometry XMTRUnited States$6.63B+44%+37%-2%91.0×n/an/a
Q2 Holdings, Inc. QTWOUnited States$4.57B+47%+13%13%22.5×26.6%+14.6%
Softcat SCT.LUnited Kingdom$4.53B+14%+35%11%17.9×-4.1%+20.3%
Amdocs DOXUnited States$4.53B-34%+4%17%7.7×-15.8%+1.8%
NS Solutions 2327.TJapan$4.43B+6%+12%12%21.3×-5.1%+8.6%

Questions

Who are TISI's main competitors?
Named competitors: NTT Data (private or unlisted), Otsuka Corporation (4768.T), Nomura Research Institute (4307.T), Fujitsu (6702.T), SCSK (private or unlisted), BIPROGY (8056.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes HyundaiAutoever (307950.KS), Pegasystems (PEGA), LG Cns (064400.KS), Box (BOX), Ingram Micro (INGM), NICE Ltd. Sponsored ADR (NICE).
Is TISI expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.1× against a peer median of 16.4×, 9th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has TISI stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +20.5% against +11.3% for the median peer; over one year -18.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.