Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2013.HK Weimob, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Weimob, Inc.2013.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Packaged Software
Momentum laggard 8
Mkt cap
$358M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
93%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.56M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-16.3 pp
WACC 9.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$0.69
1D-5.5%
1W+3.8%
1M-12.2%
3M-45.0%
6M-54.9%
YTD-62.8%
1Y-69.7%
ATR %6.9%
52w lowhigh73.8% off high

What Weimob does

Employees: 3,507

Weimob at a glance

Size Weimob (2013.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $358M, the 841st largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$0.69 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 54.9%, against -19.1% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 40.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.9%); the operating margin is -13.5% (peer median 4.7%).

Valuation It trades at 1.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.9× (5th cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 16.3 points below its cost of capital (9.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

40608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 802013.HK 45
Six months, rebased to 100: Weimob against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Weimob financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$1.88BHK$1.73BHK$1.45BHK$2.46BHK$2.14B
Revenue growth—+19%-41%+15%—
Gross profitHK$1.32BHK$1.24BHK$589MHK$1.57BHK$1.19B
EBITDA-HK$172M-HK$81.3M-HK$912M-HK$508M-HK$1.50B
Net income-HK$385M-HK$240M-HK$1.87B-HK$838M-HK$2.13B
Free cash flow-HK$521M-HK$238M-HK$253M-HK$910M-HK$1.07B
Capital expenditureHK$48.5MHK$182MHK$157MHK$331MHK$714M
Total debtn/aHK$2.48BHK$2.41BHK$3.42BHK$2.37B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Weimob competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%-10%0%+10%30023530036544813004191384300359LIMEAIOT603189VHI300150SPIR112040LAWCRNC4687369237633007302013.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Weimob is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%0×5×10×15×30023530036544813004191384300359LIMEAIOT603189VHI300150SPIR112040LAWCRNC468730115936923007302013.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Weimob is the large dot.

Weimob competitors and peer comparison

How Weimob compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Weimob against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2013.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.2%-5.8%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-54.9%-19.1%2nd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-73.8%-41.2%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+40.2%+7.9%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin-13.5%4.7%7th lowest of 21
EV / Sales1.5×3.9×5th cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-16.3 pp-7.1 pp8th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Weimob 2013.HKHong Kong$358M-55%+40%-14%1.5×n/an/a
Shenzhen Fangzhi Science and Technology 300235.SZChina$359M-33%+27%7%22.7×n/an/a
Beijing Forever Technology 300365.SZChina$357M-32%-47%-52%3.5×n/an/a
Base 4481.TJapan$356M-7%+1%26%2.0×-13.4%+11.9%
Beijing Interact Technology 300419.SZChina$360M-8%-52%-54%16.5×36.2%-17.8%
Deepexi Technology 1384.HKHong Kong$356M-88%+86%-9%2.9×n/an/a
Qtone Education Group (Guangdong) 300359.SZChina$361M-24%-29%-34%8.1×n/an/a
Lime Technologies LIME.STSweden$361M+24%+9%21%4.6×-1.6%+16.9%
PowerFleet AIOTUnited States$361M-4%+15%7%1.4×15.3%+31.3%
Shanghai WonderTek Software 603189.SSChina$355M-28%+7%-8%5.6×n/an/a
Vitalhub VHI.TOCanada$354M-2%+54%12%2.9×13.6%+51.2%
Beijing Century Real Technology 300150.SZChina$354M-21%-8%0%2.4×48.8%+2.2%
Spire Global SPIRUnited States$351M-53%-33%-108%4.3×n/an/a
Wemade 112040.KSSouth Korea$351M-43%-3%6%1.1×5.7%+37.1%
CS Disco LAWUnited States$367M+37%+12%-20%1.6×n/an/a
Cerence CRNCUnited States$369M-17%+26%12%1.4×6.4%-5.3%
TDC SOFT 4687.TJapan$347M+19%+7%10%0.8×-4.5%+12.1%
Beijing SunwayWorld Science & Technology 301159.SZChina$347M-23%+17%3%5.4×53.6%+7.0%
FFRI Security 3692.TJapan$347M+15%+28%29%11.8×34.6%+21.9%
Pro-Ship 3763.TJapan$370M+33%+15%36%5.4×-4.4%+9.4%
Hunan Creator Information Technologies 300730.SZChina$346M-28%-4%-53%10.5×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Weimob's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shenzhen Fangzhi Science and Technology (300235.SZ), Beijing Forever Technology (300365.SZ), Base (4481.T), Beijing Interact Technology (300419.SZ), Deepexi Technology (1384.HK), Qtone Education Group (Guangdong) (300359.SZ), Lime Technologies (LIME.ST), PowerFleet (AIOT).
Is Weimob expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.5× against a peer median of 3.9×, 5th cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Weimob stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -54.9% against -19.1% for the median peer; over one year -69.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.