Loading…

Kinik Co.1560.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Materials›Industrial Specialties

Taiwan maker of diamond tools and CMP pad conditioners used to polish semiconductor wafers.

≈ Like 3M's diamond-abrasives unit, but standaloneMomentum strong 64
Mkt cap
$3.04B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
77%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$41.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
35.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.0 pp
WACC 9.3%
Hurdle
+25 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · TWDNT$669.00
1D-5.8%
1W-22.8%
1M-35.7%
3M-0.9%
6M+17.0%
YTD+68.7%
1Y+108.4%
ATR %7.5%
52w lowhigh36.9% off high

What Kinik does

Taiwan maker of diamond tools and CMP pad conditioners used to polish semiconductor wafers.

Sells consumables: a pad conditioner wears out and is replaced regularly, so revenue repeats with wafer volumes at chipmakers rather than depending on new fab construction. Each conditioner must pass fab qualification before use, so customers rarely switch. Diamond wire for slicing solar wafers is a more cyclical second line.

In one line: Like 3M's diamond-abrasives unit, but standalone.

Products and services

  • CMP pad conditioners
  • Diamond cutting/grinding tools
  • Diamond wire for solar wafer cutting

Customers

  • Foundries & memory fabs
  • Solar wafer makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Wafer fabrication consumables
  • CMP conditioning & diamond tools

What could go right

  • Semiconductor capex growth, more CMP steps per node

What could go wrong

  • Foundry capex cycles
  • Customer concentration

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how, installed base). Global share leader in CMP pad conditioners via diamond-bonding IP and long fab qualification cycles.

Headquarters: Taoyuan, Taiwan · Founded: 1985 · Employees: 1,773

Named competitors

Kinik at a glance

Size Kinik (1560.TW) is a Taiwan Materials company (Industrial Specialties) with a market value of $3.04B, the 123rd largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$669.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 17.0%, against -18.5% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 19.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.9%); the operating margin is 19.0% (peer median 10.6%).

Valuation It trades at 35.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 31.9× (6th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 35% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is +25 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.0 points above its cost of capital (9.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20261560.TW 116Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Kinik against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kinik financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$9.05BNT$8.15BNT$7.02BNT$6.38BNT$6.91B
Revenue growth—+16%+10%-8%—
Gross profitNT$3.13BNT$2.58BNT$2.13BNT$1.88BNT$2.48B
EBITDANT$2.43BNT$1.95BNT$1.73BNT$1.59BNT$2.05B
Net incomeNT$1.77BNT$1.36BNT$1.04BNT$852MNT$1.25B
Free cash flowNT$879MNT$850MNT$1.27BNT$757MNT$1.76B
Capital expenditureNT$1.53BNT$1.07BNT$349MNT$541MNT$193M
Total debtNT$2.14BNT$2.42BNT$2.10BNT$2.01BNT$1.94B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kinik competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%HSCL601865WDFC60373746136036886011183800FUL46316039913002360028276882810024970013591560.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kinik is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×50×100×HSCLWDFC6037374613603688601118FUL46313002360028276882810024970013591560.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kinik is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%0%20%40%601865WDFC6037374613601118FUL4631603991688281AZZ0013590022711560.TWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kinik is the large dot.

Kinik competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1560.TW vs MMM vs SGO.PA vs 6140.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kinik 1560.TW$3.04B+17%+19%19%35.7×34.8%
3M MMM$95.7B+30%+2%21%19.2×11.3%
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain SGO.PA$40.7B-3%-2%10%12.1×5.1%
Asahi Diamond Industrial 6140.T$302M-24%+5%8%12.5×13.8%

How Kinik compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kinik against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1560.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-35.7%-10.5%lowest of 20
6-month return+17.0%-18.5%4th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-36.9%-43.2%9th highest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+19.4%+9.9%8th highest of 21
Operating margin19.0%10.6%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E35.7×31.9×6th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)34.8%9.0%2nd most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.6%+11.1%6th lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+25.2 pp-2.8 pp2nd most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.0 pp-0.8 pp2nd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA41.4×24.7×3rd most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-0.1×1.4×2nd least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kinik 1560.TWTaiwan$3.04B+17%+19%19%35.7×34.8%+9.6%
Himadri Speciality Chemical HSCL.NSIndia$3.04B-8%+25%20%31.9×n/an/a
Flat Glass 601865.SSChina$3.03B-30%-23%-2%n/a8.2%+20.0%
WD-40 WDFCUnited States$2.97B+6%+11%16%33.9×2.2%+7.1%
SKSHU Paint 603737.SSChina$3.14B-33%0%4%29.5×27.7%+8.9%
Kansai Paint 4613.TJapan$3.23B+29%+3%8%19.1×2.3%+10.1%
Crown New Materials Techn Co L 001381.SZChina$3.33Bn/a+8%10%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Pacific Quartz 603688.SSChina$2.78B-38%+15%10%82.1×n/an/a
China Hainan Rubber Industry 601118.SSChina$3.36B-27%-37%-3%104.6×2.9%+22.2%
GCL Technology 3800.HKHong Kong$2.71B-30%+25%-22%n/an/an/a
H.B. Fuller FULUnited States$2.68B-19%+1%11%9.5×3.5%+4.5%
DIC 4631.TJapan$2.68B+25%+6%7%9.3×-1.0%+8.5%
Shenzhen Leading Semiconductor Industry 603991.SSChina$2.60B+12%+996%10%n/a21.7%+12.0%
Shanghai Sinyang Semiconductor Materials 300236.SZChina$3.58B-20%+33%15%54.8×n/an/a
Xizang Gaozheng Civil Explosives 002827.SZChina$2.53B+92%-1%12%108.9×n/an/a
Shaanxi Huaqin Technology Industry 688281.SSChina$2.50B-18%+31%15%34.7×27.5%+24.7%
Quanzhou Jiadeli Electronic Materials 603435.SSChina$2.49Bn/a+4%38%n/an/an/a
Sichuan Yahua Industrial 002497.SZChina$2.48B-56%+69%18%6.2×n/an/a
AZZ AZZUnited States$3.76B-15%+10%17%16.9×9.8%+14.5%
Pamica Technology 001359.SZChina$2.41B-1%+23%23%36.2×38.0%+12.1%
Beijing Oriental Yuhong Waterproof Technology 002271.SZChina$3.92B-27%+10%1%18.8×10.6%+5.0%

Questions

Who are Kinik's main competitors?
Named competitors: 3M Company (MMM), Saint-Gobain (SGO.PA), Asahi Diamond Industrial (6140.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Himadri Speciality Chemical (HSCL.NS), Flat Glass (601865.SS), WD-40 (WDFC), SKSHU Paint (603737.SS), Kansai Paint (4613.T), Crown New Materials Techn Co L (001381.SZ).
Is Kinik expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 35.7× against a peer median of 31.9×, 6th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 35% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +10%, so the hurdle is +25 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Kinik stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +17.0% against -18.5% for the median peer; over one year +108.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.