Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1528.HK Red Star Macalline Group Corporation Ltd Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Red Star Macalline Group Corporation Ltd Class H1528.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Real Estate›Real Estate Development

Operates large home-furnishing and home-improvement shopping malls across China, leasing space to furniture and decor retailers.

≈ A Chinese mall landlord for home-furnishing retailersMomentum weak 36
Mkt cap
$1.18B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
66%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$266,869
20-day average traded
P/B
0.16×
price to book
ROE
-61.1%
delivered
Implied ROE
4.3%
what the price asks
Next earnings
146 days
1 Apr 2027
Close · HKDHK$0.95
1D-1.6%
1W+3.3%
1M-6.9%
3M-9.5%
6M-32.6%
YTD-22.1%
1Y-26.9%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh39.9% off high

What Red Star Macalline does

Operates large home-furnishing and home-improvement shopping malls across China, leasing space to furniture and decor retailers.

Landlord of furniture and building-material malls: brand tenants rent booth space and pay management fees, and it also manages malls owned by others under its name. This is the Hong Kong listing of the same company that trades in Shanghai.

In one line: A Chinese mall landlord for home-furnishing retailers.

Products and services

  • Self-owned home-furnishing malls
  • Managed/franchised malls
  • Home-improvement e-commerce platform

Customers

  • Furniture and home-decor retailers as tenants
  • Consumers shopping for home goods

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Real estate/retail
  • Home-furnishing mall operation
  • Mall leasing & management

What could go right

  • China home-renovation demand recovery

What could go wrong

  • China property/consumption slowdown hurting furniture retail tenants

Moat: narrow (installed base, scale, brand). Largest home-furnishing mall network in China gives tenants and shoppers few comparable alternatives.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Founded: 1986 · Employees: 9,012

Named competitors

Red Star Macalline at a glance

Size Red Star Macalline (1528.HK) is a Hong Kong Real Estate company (Real Estate Development) with a market value of $1.18B, the 557th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$0.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.6%, against -10.9% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 2.8% over the last twelve months (peer median -2.1%); the operating margin is -24.5% (peer median 14.7%).

Valuation It trades at 0.16× book value against a peer median of 1.32× (cheapest of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 4.3%; Red Star Macalline delivers -61.1%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 1 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 891528.HK 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Red Star Macalline against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Red Star Macalline financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$7.02BHK$7.10BHK$8.43BHK$12.7BHK$16.0B
Revenue growth—-16%-34%-20%—
Gross profitHK$4.64BHK$4.13BHK$4.76BHK$7.77BHK$8.90B
EBITDAn/aHK$1.67BHK$1.80BHK$2.97BHK$6.33B
Net income-HK$22.5B-HK$25.7B-HK$3.23B-HK$2.67BHK$650M
Free cash flowHK$1.82BHK$647M-HK$90.3MHK$225MHK$3.49B
Capital expenditureHK$271MHK$289MHK$401MHK$45.9MHK$1.22B
Total debtHK$31.8BHK$50.1BHK$33.7BHK$42.1BHK$43.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Red Star Macalline competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%8923MEQFOR600266LOTUSDEV000006FREYIRSSIGNATURECIBUS600773AEDAS0000480565YVIV23376006576001850005341528.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Red Star Macalline is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-60%-40%-20%0%20%00×1000×2000×8923MEQ600266000006SIGNATURE60077300004805656006576001851528.HKReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Red Star Macalline is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

0%500%1,000%1,500%2,000%0%1,000%2,000%8923MEQLOTUSDEV05656001851528.HKROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Red Star Macalline is the large dot.

Red Star Macalline competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1528.HK vs 000785.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Red Star Macalline 1528.HK$1.18B-33%-3%-61%0.16×4.3%
Easyhome New Retail 000785.SZ$1.97B-18%-23%-6%0.68×5.4%

How Red Star Macalline compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Red Star Macalline against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1528.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.9%-5.1%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-32.6%-10.9%4th lowest of 21
Return on equity-61.1%7.1%3rd lowest of 21
Price / book0.16×1.32×cheapest of 21
ROE the price implies4.3%8.4%least demanding of 21
ROE delivered-61.1%7.1%3rd lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Red Star Macalline 1528.HKHong Kong$1.18B-33%-3%-61%0.16×4.3%-61.1%
Tosei 8923.TJapan$1.18B+17%+14%14%1.65×7.6%14.5%
Mainstreet Equity MEQ.TOCanada$1.19B+1%+5%10%0.90×7.1%9.8%
Forestar FORUnited States$1.21B-14%-2%8%0.63×8.7%7.7%
Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co 600266.SSChina$1.16B-21%-31%-7%0.47×5.2%-7.2%
Sri Lotus Developers and Realty LOTUSDEV.NSIndia$1.21B+59%+40%15%5.62×114.8%15.5%
Shenzhen Zhenye (Group) 000006.SZChina$1.24B-37%-56%-3%1.58×15.8%-2.8%
Frey FREY.PAFrance$1.24B0%+45%12%1.06×6.6%12.1%
IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones SA Sponsored ADR IRSUnited States$1.12B-10%+4%18%0.69×8.2%18.2%
Signatureglobal (India) SIGNATURE.NSIndia$1.11B-17%-23%85%5.68×106.1%n/a
Cibus Real Estate AB (publ) CIBUS.STSweden$1.11B-12%+20%9%1.03×8.6%8.9%
Tibet Urban Development & Investment 600773.SSChina$1.27B-67%-78%-12%2.02×23.5%-12.3%
AEDAS Homes AEDAS.MCSpain$1.10B+1%-25%6%1.17×7.9%6.5%
Shenzhen Kingkey Smart Agriculture Times 000048.SZChina$1.10B-7%-17%-22%2.14×13.5%-22.0%
Art 0565.HKHong Kong$1.28B+38%+51%-66%532.05×1,228.3%-65.6%
Vivenio Residencial SOCIMI YVIV.MCSpain$1.09B-1%+34%6%0.80×5.1%n/a
Ichigo 2337.TJapan$1.09B-13%-17%14%1.48×7.4%14.4%
Cinda Real Estate 600657.SSChina$1.08B-19%-44%-32%0.49×4.9%-31.6%
Zhuhai Zhumian 600185.SSChina$1.08B-27%-49%-148%273.59×1,984.1%-148.0%
China Overseas Grand Oceans 0081.HKHong Kong$1.30B-7%-3%1%0.28×5.8%1.1%
Wedge Industrial 000534.SZChina$1.30B-57%+4%10%4.54×40.7%9.8%

Questions

Who are Red Star Macalline's main competitors?
Named competitors: Easyhome (Juran Home Furnishing) (000785.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Tosei (8923.T), Mainstreet Equity (MEQ.TO), Forestar (FOR), Beijing Urban Construction Investment & Development Co (600266.SS), Sri Lotus Developers and Realty (LOTUSDEV.NS), Shenzhen Zhenye (Group) (000006.SZ).
Is Red Star Macalline expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 0.16× against a peer median of 1.32×, cheapest of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 4.3%; Red Star Macalline delivers -61.1%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Red Star Macalline stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.6% against -10.9% for the median peer; over one year -26.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.