Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1138.HK COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation Co., Ltd. Class H1138.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Oil and gas tanker shipping arm of the COSCO Shipping group, transporting crude, products and LNG.

≈ A Chinese state-affiliated tanker shipping operatorMomentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$12.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
91%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$62.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
4.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.6 pp
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
145 days
31 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$15.52
1D-4.5%
1W-11.5%
1M-23.6%
3M+5.4%
6M-21.7%
YTD+61.7%
1Y+55.8%
ATR %7.5%
52w lowhigh30.7% off high

What COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation does

Oil and gas tanker shipping arm of the COSCO Shipping group, transporting crude, products and LNG.

Is paid freight per voyage or charter hire per day, with much of its crude fleet working for Chinese state oil companies, and the rest on the spot market, so freight rates swing earnings. LNG carriers are chartered on long-term contracts, which are steadier. This is the Hong Kong-listed share class; COSCO Shipping group, a state-owned company, controls it.

In one line: A Chinese state-affiliated tanker shipping operator.

Products and services

  • Crude oil tanker shipping
  • LNG/LPG shipping
  • Product tanker shipping

Customers

  • Oil majors and refiners
  • LNG importers/exporters

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Marine shipping
  • Oil/gas tanker shipping

What could go right

  • Tanker freight-rate upcycles
  • LNG shipping demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Tanker rate cyclicality
  • Oil-demand/geopolitical disruption

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Large tanker fleet scale but tanker rates are a cyclical, commoditized market.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Founded: 1993 · Employees: 7,979

Named competitors

COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation at a glance

Size COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation (1138.HK) is a Hong Kong Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $12.8B, the 132nd largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$15.52 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.7%, against +16.5% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 22.0% over the last twelve months (peer median -1.6%); the operating margin is 30.6% (peer median 13.8%).

Valuation It trades at 4.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 9.0× (2nd cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.6 points above its cost of capital (6.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 31 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1171138.HK 75
Six months, rebased to 100: COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$30.5BHK$25.7BHK$25.1BHK$24.9BHK$21.6B
Revenue growth—+2%+1%+15%—
Gross profitHK$10.9BHK$6.62BHK$6.78BHK$7.28BHK$3.96B
EBITDAHK$13.9BHK$9.44BHK$9.37BHK$9.43BHK$6.06B
Net incomeHK$7.54BHK$4.38BHK$4.38BHK$3.73BHK$1.70B
Free cash flowHK$1.43BHK$1.25BHK$97.1MHK$2.77B-HK$542M
Capital expenditureHK$10.8BHK$6.11BHK$8.55BHK$6.32BHK$5.17B
Total debtn/aHK$39.5BHK$38.8BHK$33.2BHK$33.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%0316910791040112006010181308260391012615601872WAWIHLAGKEX2609KNIN60042819196018661138.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%10×20×0316910791040112001308260391012615601872WAWIHLAGKEX2609KNIN60042819196018661138.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%031691070112006010181308260391012615601872WAWIHLAGMATX60042819191138.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation is the large dot.

COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1138.HK vs 601872.SS vs TNK vs FRO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation 1138.HK$12.8B-22%+22%31%4.7×0.5%
China Merchants Energy Shipping 601872.SS$19.6B-8%+60%39%6.3×-9.5%
Teekay Tankers TNK$2.97B+3%+19%39%3.5×n/a
Frontline FRO$10.1B+15%+49%49%4.2×-12.5%

How COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1138.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-23.6%-3.7%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-21.7%+16.5%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-30.7%-14.8%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+22.0%-1.6%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin30.6%13.8%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E4.7×9.0×2nd cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)0.5%-1.8%7th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.1%+9.2%6th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-6.5 pp-13.0 pp8th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.6 pp+1.8 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA9.2×7.8×7th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA1.7×0.4×4th most indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation 1138.HKHong Kong$12.8B-22%+22%31%4.7×0.5%+7.1%
OOIL 0316.HKHong Kong$12.8B+10%-8%10%5.9×-2.3%+3.6%
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha 9107.TJapan$11.0B+17%+11%8%9.4×7.3%+10.2%
Mitsui O.s.k. Lines 9104.TJapan$15.0B+10%+20%6%7.3×n/an/a
HMM 011200.KSSouth Korea$15.3B+8%-5%11%9.7×-1.8%+11.2%
Ningbo Zhoushan Port 601018.SSChina$10.4B-4%+12%16%n/a-7.3%+7.6%
SITC International 1308.HKHong Kong$15.8B+34%+5%34%10.7×-0.4%+15.3%
Evergreen Marine Corp(taiwan) 2603.TWTaiwan$16.1B+28%-20%15%5.0×-9.1%+12.9%
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 9101.TJapan$16.8B+17%0%6%9.0×7.8%+8.5%
Wan Hai Lines 2615.TWTaiwan$9.12B+40%-14%22%5.8×-12.0%+11.4%
China Merchants Energy Shipping 601872.SSChina$19.6B-8%+60%39%6.3×-9.5%+5.4%
Wallenius Wilhelmsen WAWI.OLNorway$7.58B+29%-11%25%10.4×-6.6%+21.0%
Hapag-Lloyd HLAG.DEGermany$25.1B+11%-9%2%18.5×34.4%+7.8%
Kirby KEXUnited States$6.39B-15%+8%14%14.6×6.2%+9.2%
Matson MATXUnited States$6.34B+16%0%14%10.9×11.8%+7.0%
Yang Ming Marine Transport 2609.TWTaiwan$6.03B+14%-22%6%6.5×n/an/a
Kuehne & Nagel International KNIN.SWSwitzerland$34.3B+35%+1%5%25.4×3.2%+3.7%
COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers 600428.SSChina$4.40B+25%+37%19%8.9×-17.9%+27.0%
COSCO SHIPPING 1919.HKHong Kong$38.5B+20%-5%13%6.0×-8.7%+4.3%
COSCO SHIPPING Development 601866.SSChina$3.87B-10%-3%13%3.8×n/an/a
Hoegh Autoliners HAUTO.OLNorway$3.64B+20%-4%30%9.6×-0.1%+16.4%

Questions

Who are COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation's main competitors?
Named competitors: China Merchants Energy Shipping (601872.SS), Teekay Tankers (TNK), Frontline (FRO), Euronav (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes OOIL (0316.HK), Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (9107.T), Mitsui O.s.k. Lines (9104.T), HMM (011200.KS), Ningbo Zhoushan Port (601018.SS), SITC International (1308.HK).
Is COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 4.7× against a peer median of 9.0×, 2nd cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has COSCO SHIPPING Energy Transportation stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.7% against +16.5% for the median peer; over one year +55.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.