Loading…

VM Inc.089970.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Industrial Machinery

Korean maker of dry-etch semiconductor equipment using proprietary plasma-source technology for 300mm wafer fabs.

Momentum laggard 3
Mkt cap
$590M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
65%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$21.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+61.6 pp
WACC 9.9%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩30,150
1D-8.9%
1W-26.5%
1M-53.3%
3M-54.9%
6M-43.5%
YTD-0.2%
1Y+20.6%
ATR %15.2%
52w lowhigh75.3% off high

What VM Inc. does

Korean maker of dry-etch semiconductor equipment using proprietary plasma-source technology for 300mm wafer fabs.

Sells etch tools by the unit to chipmakers, mainly memory, so revenue arrives in large lumps as customers add or replace equipment, and one customer, SK hynix, matters more than any other. Being a local supplier lets it qualify as an alternative to imported equipment.

Products and services

  • Silicon/metal-film dry etch equipment
  • Plasma-source technology

Customers

  • SK hynix
  • Other memory/foundry fabs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductor equipment
  • Dry etch systems
  • 300mm wafer fab process tools

What could go right

  • Memory capex upcycle (SK hynix)
  • Import-substitution from foreign equipment makers

What could go wrong

  • Customer concentration (SK hynix)
  • Semiconductor capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, customer qualification). Proprietary plasma-source technology now displacing foreign etch tools at SK hynix.

Headquarters: South Korea · Founded: 2002 · Employees: 102

Named competitors

VM Inc. at a glance

Size VM Inc. (089970.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $590M, the 306th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩30,150 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 43.5%, against -6.5% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 2nd lowest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 149.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.8%); the operating margin is 27.3% (peer median 6.1%).

Valuation It trades at 12.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.1× (cheapest of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 61.6 points above its cost of capital (9.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010015020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 94089970.KS 54
Six months, rebased to 100: VM Inc. against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

VM Inc. financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩248B₩144B₩70.3B₩26.0B₩141B
Revenue growth—+105%+170%-82%—
Gross profit₩102B₩52.9B₩22.5B₩11.6B₩58.4B
EBITDA₩70.1B₩26.4B-₩6.94B-₩9.33B₩32.5B
Net income₩66.0B₩26.1B-₩3.45B-₩6.98B₩27.9B
Free cash flow₩52.2B₩10.2B₩16.3B-₩17.3B-₩9.05B
Capital expenditure₩6.67B₩8.90B₩6.00B₩1.78B₩1.13B
Total debt₩2.23B₩19.2B₩18.0B₩16.6B₩16.3B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

VM Inc. competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%45733009073002723015916880696037266104301181SWTQ6277603519LSC68866560086066404506089970.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. VM Inc. is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%20×30×40×6880696104301181SWTQ627768866566404506089970.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. VM Inc. is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%300272603726301181SWTQ6277HEROMOTORSLSC68866566404506089970.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. VM Inc. is the large dot.

VM Inc. competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (089970.KS vs AMAT vs LRCX vs 8035.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
VM Inc. 089970.KS$590M-44%+150%27%12.6×-0.3%
Applied Materials AMAT$264B-24%+8%31%18.8×25.5%
Lam Research LRCX$250B-32%+33%37%19.6×26.4%
Tokyo Electron 8035.T$122B+41%+18%28%23.1×28.8%

How VM Inc. compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

VM Inc. against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure089970.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-53.3%-9.1%lowest of 21
6-month return-43.5%-6.5%2nd lowest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-75.3%-39.0%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+149.9%+3.8%highest of 21
Operating margin27.3%6.1%highest of 21
Forward P/E12.6×22.1×cheapest of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.3%9.6%4th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+9.2%+6.5%5th highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.5 pp+2.7 pp4th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+61.6 pp-3.4 pp2nd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.7×17.0×2nd cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA-2.7×0.9×4th least indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
VM Inc. 089970.KSSouth Korea$590M-44%+150%27%12.6×-0.3%+9.2%
GMT Global 4573.TWOTaiwan$589M-14%-3%-19%n/an/an/a
Kangping Technology (Suzhou) 300907.SZChina$588M+33%+37%6%n/an/an/a
Canature Health Technology 300272.SZChina$587M-30%+4%9%n/a3.4%+9.3%
Nanjing Comptech Composites 301591.SZChina$593M+18%+10%14%n/an/an/a
Wuxi Delinhai Environmental Technology 688069.SSChina$586M-8%+18%5%37.2×n/an/a
Zhejiang Langdi 603726.SSChina$597M-14%-9%10%n/a9.6%+5.4%
Shibaura Machine 6104.TJapan$597M+2%-22%2%41.3×n/an/a
Jiangyin PIVOT Automotive Products 301181.SZChina$582M-25%-9%16%26.2×22.5%-2.9%
Schweiter Technologies SWTQ.SWSwitzerland$581M+19%-12%4%15.6×-3.5%-4.9%
Hosokawa Micron 6277.TJapan$601M+7%-1%5%14.6×14.6%+7.8%
Jiangsu Liba Enterprise Joint-Stock 603519.SSChina$578M0%0%10%n/a14.8%+5.4%
Hero Motors HEROMOTORS.NSIndia$578Mn/a+9%6%n/a37.3%+4.0%
London Security LSC.LUnited Kingdom$602M+16%+12%13%n/a-7.1%+9.9%
Cubic Sensor and Instrument 688665.SSChina$603M-19%+6%12%24.1×30.0%+27.3%
Beijing Jingcheng Machinery Electric 600860.SSChina$576M-24%-5%-8%n/an/an/a
Shang Gong 600843.SSChina$575M-17%+2%-5%n/an/an/a
Gallant Micro Machining 6640.TWOTaiwan$575M-53%+39%19%20.1×8.0%+25.1%
Robotphoenix Intelligent Technology 6871.HKHong Kong$606Mn/a+45%-38%n/an/an/a
Yanpai Filtration Technology 301081.SZChina$607M+9%+16%3%n/an/an/a
Gfc 4506.TWOTaiwan$608M-5%+4%22%17.2×-9.7%+6.5%

Questions

Who are VM Inc.'s main competitors?
Named competitors: Applied Materials (AMAT), Lam Research (LRCX), Tokyo Electron (8035.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes GMT Global (4573.TWO), Kangping Technology (Suzhou) (300907.SZ), Canature Health Technology (300272.SZ), Nanjing Comptech Composites (301591.SZ), Wuxi Delinhai Environmental Technology (688069.SS), Zhejiang Langdi (603726.SS).
Is VM Inc. expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.6× against a peer median of 22.1×, cheapest of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has VM Inc. stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -43.5% against -6.5% for the median peer; over one year +20.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.