Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 0751.HK Skyworth Group LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Skyworth Group Limited0751.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Telecommunications Equipment
Momentum weak 21
Mkt cap
$749M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
29%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.83M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.8 pp
WACC 5.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
139 days
25 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$3.11
1D-4.0%
1W-3.1%
1M+8.2%
3M-30.6%
6M-51.1%
YTD-33.7%
1Y-33.4%
ATR %5.1%
52w lowhigh59.0% off high

What Skyworth does

Employees: 29,300

Skyworth at a glance

Size Skyworth (0751.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Telecommunications Equipment) with a market value of $749M, the 663rd largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$3.11 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 51.1%, against -29.8% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.3%); the operating margin is 1.9% (peer median -7.3%).

Valuation It trades at 6.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 49.5× (cheapest of 9).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.8 points below its cost of capital (5.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 690751.HK 49
Six months, rebased to 100: Skyworth against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Skyworth financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$80.6BHK$76.3BHK$70.5BHK$76.3BHK$62.2B
Revenue growth—+8%-8%+23%—
Gross profitHK$10.8BHK$9.77BHK$9.55BHK$10.7BHK$9.54B
EBITDAHK$2.44BHK$1.89BHK$2.18BHK$2.98BHK$2.32B
Net incomeHK$964MHK$386MHK$616MHK$1.18BHK$962M
Free cash flow-HK$6.06BHK$315M-HK$3.18BHK$284MHK$3.02B
Capital expenditureHK$1.49BHK$1.52BHK$1.48BHK$2.01BHK$2.86B
Total debtn/aHK$20.3BHK$17.5BHK$17.0BHK$17.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Skyworth competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%+10%6887886881910020526036600023833673000892CRI002796300504FEIM300134301191300711186AFTC300177300213249832680751.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Skyworth is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%0×25×50×75×6881913673CRIFEIM301191FTC30021332680751.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Skyworth is the large dot.

Skyworth competitors and peer comparison

How Skyworth compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Skyworth against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure0751.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.2%-14.3%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-51.1%-29.8%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-59.0%-52.2%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.0%+0.3%10th highest of 21
Operating margin1.9%-7.3%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E6.2×49.5×cheapest of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.8 pp-12.5 pp5th highest of 20
Net debt / EBITDA5.5×-4.0×most indebted of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Skyworth 0751.HKHong Kong$749M-51%+5%2%6.2×n/an/a
ShenZhen Consys Science & Technology 688788.SSChina$746M-41%-22%-173%n/an/an/a
Zhiyang Innovation Technology 688191.SSChina$753M-53%-2%-8%57.9×n/an/a
Shenzhen Coship Electronics 002052.SZChina$757M-34%-75%-5%n/an/an/a
Suzhou Keda Technology 603660.SSChina$713M-31%-32%-59%n/an/an/a
Beijing UniStrong Science & Technology 002383.SZChina$712M-30%-1%-15%n/an/an/a
TPK 3673.TWTaiwan$701M-9%+1%0%12.5×-14.1%-11.3%
H&R Century Union 000892.SZChina$699M-4%+21%-52%n/an/an/a
Creotech Instruments CRI.WAPoland$697M+15%+96%11%85.5×n/an/a
Suzhou Shijia Science & Technology 002796.SZChina$696M-67%-4%-7%n/a38.8%-10.4%
Sichuan Tianyi Comheart Telecom 300504.SZChina$685M-1%+17%3%n/an/an/a
Frequency Electronics FEIMUnited States$679M+3%+6%8%51.7×n/an/a
Anhui Tatfook Technology 300134.SZChina$852M-32%+14%-14%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Phoenix Telecom Technology 301191.SZChina$854M-42%+30%0%47.2×n/an/a
GHT 300711.SZChina$650M-26%+29%14%n/an/an/a
Astroscale 186A.TJapan$865M-25%+70%-275%n/an/an/a
Filtronic FTC.LUnited Kingdom$639M-41%-1%7%72.5×59.4%+29.0%
Guangzhou Hi-Target Navigation Tech 300177.SZChina$635M-30%-25%-32%n/a25.8%-10.6%
Beijing Jiaxun Feihong Electrical 300213.SZChina$634M-15%-9%-17%33.9×20.0%-2.1%
HTC 2498.TWTaiwan$885M-15%-8%-78%n/an/an/a
MeiG Smart Technology 3268.HKHong Kong$628M-30%+31%7%16.2×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Skyworth's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: ShenZhen Consys Science & Technology (688788.SS), Zhiyang Innovation Technology (688191.SS), Shenzhen Coship Electronics (002052.SZ), Suzhou Keda Technology (603660.SS), Beijing UniStrong Science & Technology (002383.SZ), TPK (3673.TW), H&R Century Union (000892.SZ), Creotech Instruments (CRI.WA).
Is Skyworth expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.2× against a peer median of 49.5×, cheapest of 9 in its peer set.
How has Skyworth stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -51.1% against -29.8% for the median peer; over one year -33.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.