Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002052.SZ Shenzhen Coship Electronics Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Coship Electronics Co., Ltd. Class A002052.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Telecommunications Equipment
Momentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$757M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$7.95M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥6.71
1D-2.8%
1W+5.3%
1M-14.1%
3M-23.3%
6M-33.5%
YTD-47.4%
1Y-55.8%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh60.1% off high

What Shenzhen Coship Electronics does

Employees: 215

Shenzhen Coship Electronics at a glance

Size Shenzhen Coship Electronics (002052.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Telecommunications Equipment) with a market value of $757M, the 2879th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥6.71 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 33.5%, against -28.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 74.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.2%); the operating margin is -4.7% (peer median -7.3%).

Valuation It trades at 18.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 5.0× (3rd most expensive of 21).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 71002052.SZ 60
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Coship Electronics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Coship Electronics financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥257MCN¥690MCN¥599MCN¥234MCN¥254M
Revenue growth—+15%+156%-8%—
Gross profitCN¥81.4MCN¥281MCN¥192M-CN¥18.1MCN¥4.26M
EBITDAn/aCN¥244MCN¥110M-CN¥71.1M-CN¥45.4M
Net income-CN¥24.3MCN¥180MCN¥69.6M-CN¥74.7M-CN¥47.6M
Free cash flow-CN¥54.7M-CN¥12.5MCN¥336M-CN¥46.1M-CN¥29.5M
Capital expenditureCN¥4.59MCN¥2.66MCN¥1.34MCN¥26.5MCN¥7.13M
Total debtCN¥13.3MCN¥9.13MCN¥28.0MCN¥58.0MCN¥26.8M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Coship Electronics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%+10%68819107516887886036600023833673000892CRI002796300504FEIM300134301191186A3007112498FTC3596300177300213002052.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Coship Electronics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×10×20×68819107516887886036600023833673000892CRI300504FEIM301191186A300711FTC300177300213002052.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Coship Electronics is the large dot.

Shenzhen Coship Electronics competitors and peer comparison

How Shenzhen Coship Electronics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Coship Electronics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002052.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-14.1%-13.8%11th highest of 21
6-month return-33.5%-28.0%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-60.1%-51.3%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-74.8%+3.2%lowest of 21
Operating margin-4.7%-7.3%10th highest of 21
EV / Sales18.7×5.0×3rd most expensive of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Coship Electronics 002052.SZChina$757M-34%-75%-5%18.7×n/an/a
Zhiyang Innovation Technology 688191.SSChina$753M-53%-2%-8%5.2×n/an/a
Skyworth 0751.HKHong Kong$749M-51%+5%2%0.3×n/an/a
ShenZhen Consys Science & Technology 688788.SSChina$746M-41%-22%-173%22.2×n/an/a
Suzhou Keda Technology 603660.SSChina$713M-31%-32%-59%5.5×n/an/a
Beijing UniStrong Science & Technology 002383.SZChina$712M-30%-1%-15%3.9×n/an/a
TPK 3673.TWTaiwan$701M-9%+1%0%0.3×-14.1%-11.3%
H&R Century Union 000892.SZChina$699M-4%+21%-52%7.7×n/an/a
Creotech Instruments CRI.WAPoland$697M+15%+96%11%17.0×n/an/a
Suzhou Shijia Science & Technology 002796.SZChina$696M-67%-4%-7%5.6×38.8%-10.4%
Sichuan Tianyi Comheart Telecom 300504.SZChina$685M-1%+17%3%2.8×n/an/a
Frequency Electronics FEIMUnited States$679M+3%+6%8%8.6×n/an/a
Anhui Tatfook Technology 300134.SZChina$852M-32%+14%-14%2.3×n/an/a
Shenzhen Phoenix Telecom Technology 301191.SZChina$854M-42%+30%0%2.5×n/an/a
Astroscale 186A.TJapan$865M-25%+70%-275%22.4×n/an/a
GHT 300711.SZChina$650M-26%+29%14%4.3×n/an/a
HTC 2498.TWTaiwan$885M-15%-8%-78%6.0×n/an/a
Filtronic FTC.LUnited Kingdom$639M-41%-1%7%8.4×59.4%+29.0%
Arcadyan Technology 3596.TWTaiwan$900M-17%+6%6%0.4×n/an/a
Guangzhou Hi-Target Navigation Tech 300177.SZChina$635M-30%-25%-32%4.9×25.8%-10.6%
Beijing Jiaxun Feihong Electrical 300213.SZChina$634M-15%-9%-17%4.5×20.0%-2.1%

Questions

Which companies are Shenzhen Coship Electronics's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Zhiyang Innovation Technology (688191.SS), Skyworth (0751.HK), ShenZhen Consys Science & Technology (688788.SS), Suzhou Keda Technology (603660.SS), Beijing UniStrong Science & Technology (002383.SZ), TPK (3673.TW), H&R Century Union (000892.SZ), Creotech Instruments (CRI.WA).
Is Shenzhen Coship Electronics expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 18.7× against a peer median of 5.0×, 3rd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shenzhen Coship Electronics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -33.5% against -28.0% for the median peer; over one year -55.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.