Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000889.SZ ZJBC Information Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

ZJBC Information Technology Co., Ltd. Class A000889.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Other Consumer Services
Momentum weak 25
Mkt cap
$447M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
91%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-3.6 pp
WACC 6.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥3.19
1D-2.5%
1W+7.8%
1M-10.9%
3M-14.9%
6M-27.8%
YTD-11.4%
1Y-16.9%
ATR %5.7%
52w lowhigh45.8% off high

What ZJBC Information Technology does

Employees: 3,789

ZJBC Information Technology at a glance

Size ZJBC Information Technology (000889.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Other Consumer Services) with a market value of $447M, the 4118th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥3.19 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 27.8%, against -9.9% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 5.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.0%); the operating margin is 0.0% (peer median 10.1%).

Valuation It trades at 2.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.6× (8th cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.6 points below its cost of capital (6.5% WACC).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 87000889.SZ 66
Six months, rebased to 100: ZJBC Information Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

ZJBC Information Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.49BCN¥1.59BCN¥1.46BCN¥1.43BCN¥1.51B
Revenue growth—+9%+2%-6%—
Gross profitCN¥162MCN¥127MCN¥120MCN¥114MCN¥133M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥2.24M-CN¥6.96M-CN¥17.8M-CN¥12.6M
Net incomeCN¥127M-CN¥26.5M-CN¥35.4M-CN¥125M-CN¥79.1M
Free cash flow-CN¥100.0MCN¥30.4M-CN¥67.6M-CN¥84.0M-CN¥26.3M
Capital expenditureCN¥5.52MCN¥9.98MCN¥11.1MCN¥36.4MCN¥11.1M
Total debtCN¥165MCN¥98.1MCN¥66.0MCN¥45.6MCN¥75.6M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

ZJBC Information Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-20%-10%0%-10%0%RBWGYM000978CSVIELMHRIL002786000802WJP30024796039733THOMASCOOK3496600749273168812984620021595530000889.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. ZJBC Information Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×5×10×RBWGYM000978CSVIELMHRIL002786000802WJP9603THOMASCOOK3496600749273184620021595530000889.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. ZJBC Information Technology is the large dot.

ZJBC Information Technology competitors and peer comparison

How ZJBC Information Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

ZJBC Information Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000889.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.9%-1.9%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-27.8%-9.9%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.8%-36.4%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-5.4%+3.0%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin0.0%10.1%4th lowest of 21
EV / Sales2.1×2.6×8th cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.6 pp+1.1 pp7th lowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
ZJBC Information Technology 000889.SZChina$447M-28%-5%0%2.1×n/an/a
Rainbow Tours RBW.WAPoland$458M-8%+11%6%0.3×-10.6%+60.0%
Gym GYM.LUnited Kingdom$436M+1%+9%13%2.8×11.7%+24.9%
Guilin Tourism 000978.SZChina$431M-8%+2%-6%8.2×33.7%+12.6%
Carriage Services CSVUnited States$426M-41%+1%23%2.3×-4.3%+4.9%
IDP Education IEL.AXAustralia$424M-19%-10%12%1.0×-3.0%+8.5%
Mahindra Holidays & Resorts India MHRIL.NSIndia$422M-18%+7%6%2.4×30.5%+12.0%
Shenzhen Silver Basis Technology 002786.SZChina$483M-17%+1%1%1.6×29.9%-6.6%
Beijing Jingxi Culture and Tourism 000802.SZChina$409M-12%-60%-62%15.4×10.6%-4.8%
Vicom WJP.SISingapore$489M-1%+29%34%3.5×-8.4%+14.1%
Youngy Health 300247.SZChina$409M-21%+2%19%2.8×5.7%+12.8%
H.I.S.Co 9603.TJapan$492M0%+4%3%0.4×-1.9%-2.8%
Nagase Brothers 9733.TJapan$404M-5%+8%9%1.3×-8.3%+7.0%
Thomas Cook (India) THOMASCOOK.NSIndia$499M+1%-7%3%0.5×13.8%+60.2%
Azoom 3496.TJapan$385M+21%+26%19%3.5×-1.0%+28.7%
Tibet Tourism 600749.SSChina$384M-29%-7%-12%11.0×49.8%+8.1%
Lion Travel Service 2731.TWTaiwan$382M-15%+5%5%0.2×-20.4%+35.6%
Donglai Coating Technology (Shanghai) 688129.SSChina$370M-30%+7%13%2.8×n/an/a
Power Wind Health Industry 8462.TWTaiwan$366M+2%+20%17%2.6×-4.4%+10.5%
Wuhan Sante Cableways 002159.SZChina$356M-18%-3%37%3.5×-8.9%+9.6%
Lungyen Life Service 5530.TWOTaiwan$565M+1%-17%20%2.5×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are ZJBC Information Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Rainbow Tours (RBW.WA), Gym (GYM.L), Guilin Tourism (000978.SZ), Carriage Services (CSV), IDP Education (IEL.AX), Mahindra Holidays & Resorts India (MHRIL.NS), Shenzhen Silver Basis Technology (002786.SZ), Beijing Jingxi Culture and Tourism (000802.SZ).
Is ZJBC Information Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.1× against a peer median of 2.6×, 8th cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has ZJBC Information Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -27.8% against -9.9% for the median peer; over one year -16.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.