Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SINDHUTRAD.NS Sindhu Trade Links Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Sindhu Trade Links Ltd.SINDHUTRAD.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Transport & Logistics›Air Freight/Couriers
Momentum weak 31
Mkt cap
$405M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
15%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$107,766
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-9.5 pp
WACC 9.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · INR₹20.76
1D-2.4%
1W+6.5%
1M-4.2%
3M-14.2%
6M-11.6%
YTD+5.2%
1Y-13.1%
ATR %5.5%
Beta1.12
52w lowhigh27.5% off high

What Sindhu Trade Links does

Employees: 1,300

Sindhu Trade Links at a glance

Size Sindhu Trade Links (SINDHUTRAD.NS) is an India Industrials company (Air Freight/Couriers) with a market value of $405M, the 934th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹20.76 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.6%, against -13.3% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 63.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.8%); the operating margin is 2.0% (peer median 2.3%).

Valuation It trades at 9.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.8× (3rd most expensive of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.5 points below its cost of capital (9.7% WACC).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SINDHUTRAD.NS 89Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Sindhu Trade Links against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sindhu Trade Links financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹4.88B₹5.24B₹17.3B₹16.9B₹11.8B
Revenue growth—-70%+3%+43%—
Gross profit₹630M₹614M₹4.90B₹4.05B₹2.34B
EBITDA₹274M₹239M₹2.33B₹1.53B₹708M
Net income₹566M₹414M₹257M₹569M₹4.04M
Free cash flown/a-₹127M-₹2.00B₹5.73B-₹3.04B
Capital expendituren/a₹59.0M₹286M₹793M₹508M
Total debt₹5.59B₹4.63B₹3.72B₹10.2B₹16.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sindhu Trade Links competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%RLGT002485603535MAHLOG603836300350603648PNLF836033290027695609938160381356079310S08TVSSCS300873000701SINDHUTRAD.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sindhu Trade Links is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×5×10×RLGT002485603535MAHLOG603836300350603648603329002769560960381356079310S08000701SINDHUTRAD.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sindhu Trade Links is the large dot.

Sindhu Trade Links competitors and peer comparison

How Sindhu Trade Links compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sindhu Trade Links against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSINDHUTRAD.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.2%-6.9%9th highest of 21
6-month return-11.6%-13.3%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-27.5%-25.7%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-63.7%+2.8%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin2.0%2.3%9th lowest of 20
EV / Sales9.2×1.8×3rd most expensive of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.5 pp-2.3 pp4th lowest of 19
Net debt / EBITDA15.1×1.7×2nd most indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Sindhu Trade Links SINDHUTRAD.NSIndia$405M-12%-64%2%9.2×n/an/a
Radiant Logistics RLGTUnited States$418M+8%+4%2%0.5×16.3%+0.8%
Cedar Development 002485.SZChina$392M-2%-32%-17%5.0×n/an/a
Guangzhou Jiacheng International Logistics 603535.SSChina$427M-30%-29%-2%4.2×16.0%-0.4%
Mahindra Logistics MAHLOG.NSIndia$443M+5%+20%2%0.6×33.7%+16.5%
Bondex Supply Chain Management 603836.SSChina$364M-14%+17%1%0.2×n/an/a
HPF 300350.SZChina$465M-13%+73%-5%5.0×n/an/a
Shanghai Shine-Link International Logistics 603648.SSChina$467M-15%+10%11%1.9×-0.7%+0.3%
PostNL PNL.ASNetherlands$473M-16%+2%1%n/an/an/a
COSCO Shipping International Singapore F83.SISingapore$347M-18%+10%7%1.9×17.2%+0.9%
Shanghai Ace Investment & Development 603329.SSChina$341M-19%-60%10%1.2×-6.5%+10.9%
Guangdong Prolto Supply Chain Management 002769.SZChina$337M-39%-66%-13%11.3×41.0%-42.0%
Dimerco Express 5609.TWOTaiwan$333M-1%+2%4%0.2×-15.9%+5.3%
AIT 9381.TJapan$327M-1%+5%7%0.6×-5.2%+5.0%
Guangdong Gensho Logistics 603813.SSChina$323M-44%-41%-30%12.0×n/an/a
Farglory Free Trade Zone Investment 5607.TWTaiwan$534M0%+30%42%6.2×-2.7%+16.8%
Japan Transcity 9310.TJapan$538M+15%+1%7%0.8×1.3%+4.4%
Singapore Post S08.SISingapore$546M-17%-73%3%1.9×n/an/a
TVS Supply Chain Solutions TVSSCS.NSIndia$547M-4%+17%2%0.4×14.4%+9.7%
Hichain Logistics 300873.SZChina$560M-22%+15%14%1.8×3.2%+12.1%
Xiamen Xinde 000701.SZChina$568M-3%-22%n/a0.6×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Sindhu Trade Links's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Radiant Logistics (RLGT), Cedar Development (002485.SZ), Guangzhou Jiacheng International Logistics (603535.SS), Mahindra Logistics (MAHLOG.NS), Bondex Supply Chain Management (603836.SS), HPF (300350.SZ), Shanghai Shine-Link International Logistics (603648.SS), PostNL (PNL.AS).
Is Sindhu Trade Links expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 9.2× against a peer median of 1.8×, 3rd most expensive of 20 in its peer set.
How has Sindhu Trade Links stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.6% against -13.3% for the median peer; over one year -13.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.