Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SBO.OL Selvaag Bolig ASAOpen in the cockpit ↗

Selvaag Bolig ASASBO.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Consumer Discretionary›Homebuilding
Momentum neutral 41
Mkt cap
$319M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
30%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$52,122
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.8 pp
WACC 6.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
103 days
17 Feb 2027
Close · NOKNOK 31.65
1D-3.5%
1W-0.8%
1M+4.8%
3M-4.8%
6M-3.2%
YTD-13.8%
1Y-3.4%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh16.7% off high

What Selvaag Bolig does

Employees: 82

Selvaag Bolig at a glance

Size Selvaag Bolig (SBO.OL) is a Norway Consumer Discretionary company (Homebuilding) with a market value of $319M, the 111th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 31.65 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.2%, against -11.2% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 180.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.2%); the operating margin is 5.6% (peer median 5.8%).

Valuation It trades at 12.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.6× (4th cheapest of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.8 points below its cost of capital (6.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

909510010511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SBO.OL 95Peer median 89
Six months, rebased to 100: Selvaag Bolig against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Selvaag Bolig financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 3.23BNOK 2.09BNOK 1.97BNOK 3.25BNOK 2.90B
Revenue growth—+6%-39%+12%—
Gross profitNOK 445MNOK 313MNOK 381MNOK 568MNOK 573M
EBITDANOK 188MNOK 64.0MNOK 136MNOK 323MNOK 346M
Net incomeNOK 223MNOK 133MNOK 177MNOK 245MNOK 339M
Free cash flow-NOK 934M-NOK 1.34BNOK 39.2MNOK 1.10BNOK 289M
Capital expenditureNOK 4.79MNOK 2.43MNOK 4.41MNOK 3.66MNOK 2.34M
Total debtNOK 4.07BNOK 3.06BNOK 1.64BNOK 1.42BNOK 2.50B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Selvaag Bolig competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%+10%-40%-20%0%5508MTHH2527ISUR25242545LIC2511KOF5213MERBXBL966360530314191489000797HOV2520SBO.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Selvaag Bolig is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%20×40×60×MTHHISURLICKOFMER1419SDHCHOV2520SBO.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Selvaag Bolig is the large dot.

Selvaag Bolig competitors and peer comparison

How Selvaag Bolig compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Selvaag Bolig against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSBO.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.8%-4.0%4th highest of 21
6-month return-3.2%-11.2%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-16.7%-30.6%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+180.7%+0.2%highest of 20
Operating margin5.6%5.8%10th lowest of 20
Forward P/E12.1×19.6×4th cheapest of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.8 pp-3.4 pp9th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA36.6×12.8×3rd most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA20.8×3.9×3rd most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Selvaag Bolig SBO.OLNorway$319M-3%+181%6%12.1×n/an/a
Yungshin Construction & Development 5508.TWOTaiwan$315M-3%+35%32%n/a1.0%-3.9%
MT Hojgaard Holding A/S MTHH.CODenmark$329M-16%-13%4%13.3×n/an/a
Hung Ching Development & Construction 2527.TWTaiwan$308M+15%-20%22%n/a-4.7%-28.3%
Inmobiliaria del Sur ISUR.MCSpain$351M+4%-5%17%19.6×-0.2%+18.9%
King's Town Construction 2524.TWTaiwan$357M-11%-78%30%n/an/an/a
Huang Hsiang Construction 2545.TWTaiwan$359M-18%-62%6%n/an/an/a
Lifestyle Communities LIC.AXAustralia$364M-12%+39%2%22.0×29.6%+8.3%
Prince Housing & Development 2511.TWTaiwan$393M+1%+21%6%n/a0.2%-4.8%
Kaufman & Broad KOF.PAFrance$437M-19%0%8%7.3×-16.2%-0.5%
YeaShin International Development 5213.TWOTaiwan$448M-24%-32%18%n/an/an/a
Mears MER.LUnited Kingdom$455M+9%+2%6%9.7×-10.5%+7.1%
BOXABL BXBLUnited States$466M-81%n/an/an/an/an/a
Nagawa 9663.TJapan$475M-8%+3%13%n/a4.9%+3.8%
Hangzhou Landscaping 605303.SSChina$484M-17%-34%-27%n/an/an/a
Tama Home 1419.TJapan$486M-26%+2%2%20.5×n/an/a
GC Construction 1489.HKHong Kong$495M+646%-51%-23%n/a30.4%-10.0%
Smith Douglas Homes SDHCUnited States$499M-25%0%3%60.2×n/an/a
China Wuyi 000797.SZChina$517M-24%+78%-5%n/a-8.0%+4.2%
Hovnanian Enterprises HOVUnited States$594M-6%-10%3%25.4×4.8%+4.9%
Kindom Development 2520.TWTaiwan$600M+15%+10%16%7.0×-13.2%-3.5%

Questions

Which companies are Selvaag Bolig's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Yungshin Construction & Development (5508.TWO), MT Hojgaard Holding A/S (MTHH.CO), Hung Ching Development & Construction (2527.TW), Inmobiliaria del Sur (ISUR.MC), King's Town Construction (2524.TW), Huang Hsiang Construction (2545.TW), Lifestyle Communities (LIC.AX), Prince Housing & Development (2511.TW).
Is Selvaag Bolig expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.1× against a peer median of 19.6×, 4th cheapest of 10 in its peer set.
How has Selvaag Bolig stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.2% against -11.2% for the median peer; over one year -3.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.