Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › RBA.NS Restaurant Brands Asia LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Restaurant Brands Asia LimitedRBA.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Consumer & Retail›Restaurants
Momentum strong 76
Mkt cap
$668M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
36%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.63M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-11.1 pp
WACC 10.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
100 days
14 Feb 2027
Close · INR₹88.62
1D-6.0%
1W+1.0%
1M-7.8%
3M-1.8%
6M+31.0%
YTD+40.4%
1Y+23.4%
ATR %5.5%
Beta0.40
52w lowhigh20.3% off high

What Restaurant Brands Asia does

Employees: 12,372

Restaurant Brands Asia at a glance

Size Restaurant Brands Asia (RBA.NS) is an India Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $668M, the 737th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹88.62 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 31.0%, against +3.2% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 15.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.5%); the operating margin is -0.4% (peer median 6.9%).

Valuation It trades at 2.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.3× (4th most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 11.1 points below its cost of capital (10.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 14 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014016011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026RBA.NS 130Peer median 104
Six months, rebased to 100: Restaurant Brands Asia against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Restaurant Brands Asia financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹30.9B₹28.2B₹25.5B₹24.4B₹20.5B
Revenue growth—+11%+5%+19%—
Gross profit₹11.8B₹7.05B₹5.76B₹5.28B₹4.24B
EBITDA₹3.95B₹3.35B₹2.71B₹2.61B₹1.15B
Net income-₹1.34B-₹1.87B-₹2.16B-₹2.18B-₹2.21B
Free cash flown/a-₹893M₹650M₹540M-₹2.33B
Capital expendituren/a₹3.72B₹2.77B₹2.82B₹3.52B
Total debt₹19.6B₹19.7B₹18.3B₹14.3B₹11.7B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Restaurant Brands Asia competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%0%+20%+40%PZZACNNE3399AWSAPPHIRE96589887MTY7611CKFFSTA2589FWRG309127271405ELIORBRCB2157RBA.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Restaurant Brands Asia is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%1×2×3×PZZACNNE3399AWSAPPHIRE96589887MTY7611CKFFSTA2589FWRG309127271405ELIORBRCBBLMN2157RBA.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Restaurant Brands Asia is the large dot.

Restaurant Brands Asia competitors and peer comparison

How Restaurant Brands Asia compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Restaurant Brands Asia against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureRBA.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.8%+9.1%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return+31.0%+3.2%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-20.3%-22.8%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+15.6%+10.5%8th highest of 21
Operating margin-0.4%6.9%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales2.4×1.3×4th most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-11.1 pp+0.8 pp3rd lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA18.5×8.5×2nd most expensive of 20
Net debt / EBITDA2.6×2.5×10th most indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Restaurant Brands Asia RBA.NSIndia$668M+31%+16%0%2.4×n/an/a
Papa John's International PZZAUnited States$650M-37%-6%5%0.8×4.8%+2.5%
Cannae CNNEUnited States$700M+25%-7%-17%1.9×n/an/a
Maruchiyo Yamaokaya 3399.TJapan$710M+82%+19%11%2.3×3.5%+24.7%
A&W Food Services of Canada AW.TOCanada$625M0%+3%30%5.9×2.6%-0.6%
Sapphire Foods India SAPPHIRE.NSIndia$715M+12%+13%4%2.4×46.7%+25.1%
Super Hi International 9658.HKHong Kong$619M-23%+11%6%0.7×-1.7%+30.7%
Matsuya Foods 9887.TJapan$733M+7%+18%4%0.8×n/an/a
MTY Food MTY.TOCanada$600M-6%-4%16%1.6×-3.8%+18.4%
Hiday Hidaka 7611.TJapan$760M+11%+10%11%1.6×-3.3%+16.1%
Collins Foods CKF.AXAustralia$762M+15%+5%8%1.2×1.4%+8.4%
Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C FSTA.LUnited Kingdom$576M+29%+6%12%1.6×8.0%+40.3%
Auntea Jenny (Shanghai) Industrial 2589.HKHong Kong$784M-61%+36%15%0.7×-7.1%+23.7%
First Watch Restaurant FWRGUnited States$794M+6%+16%3%1.4×n/an/a
Bronco Billy 3091.TJapan$551M+41%+14%12%2.3×1.5%+11.8%
Wowprime 2727.TWTaiwan$550M-1%+10%8%0.7×-11.9%+9.0%
DPC Dash 1405.HKHong Kong$548M-34%+26%4%0.9×6.6%+36.3%
Elior ELIOR.PAFrance$544M-35%0%2%0.3×6.3%+9.2%
Black Rock Coffee Bar BRCBUnited States$538M-6%+24%3%3.4×n/an/a
Bloomin' Brands BLMNUnited States$835M+23%-2%3%0.7×10.6%+4.5%
Koshidaka 2157.TJapan$530M-6%+16%13%1.1×-9.8%+31.1%

Questions

Which companies are Restaurant Brands Asia's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Papa John's International (PZZA), Cannae (CNNE), Maruchiyo Yamaokaya (3399.T), A&W Food Services of Canada (AW.TO), Sapphire Foods India (SAPPHIRE.NS), Super Hi International (9658.HK), Matsuya Foods (9887.T), MTY Food (MTY.TO).
Is Restaurant Brands Asia expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 2.4× against a peer median of 1.3×, 4th most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Restaurant Brands Asia stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +31.0% against +3.2% for the median peer; over one year +23.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.