Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › FSTA.L Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C. Class AFSTA.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Consumer Discretionary›Restaurants
Momentum leader 88
Mkt cap
$576M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
93%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$475,956
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.5 pp
WACC 9.1%
Hurdle
-32 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
5 days
11 Nov 2026
Close · GBP£822.00
1D-2.1%
1W+1.5%
1M+16.1%
3M+12.3%
6M+29.2%
YTD+14.2%
1Y+33.4%
ATR %3.1%
52w lowhigh2.4% off high

What Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C does

Employees: 5,308

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C at a glance

Size Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C (FSTA.L) is a United Kingdom Consumer Discretionary company (Restaurants) with a market value of $576M, the 278th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £822.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 29.2%, against -3.1% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.1%); the operating margin is 11.5% (peer median 5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 15.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.1× (8th cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +40%, so the hurdle is -32 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.5 points below its cost of capital (9.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026FSTA.L 130Peer median 97
Six months, rebased to 100: Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£398M£398M£376M£359M£337M
Revenue growth—+6%+5%+7%—
Gross profit£45.9M£130M£124M£115M£118M
EBITDA£74.6M£74.6M£67.6M£61.9M£52.2M
Net income£21.2M£21.2M£27.2M£9.10M£7.90M
Free cash flow£32.4M£32.4M-£5.50M£30.7M£8.10M
Capital expenditure£39.4M£39.4M£53.2M£27.2M£30.7M
Total debtn/a£209M£217M£211M£219M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%0%+20%+40%MTY309127271405ELIORBRCB9658AW2157000721PZZAPTLOMARSRBA9900742145334078832705FSTA.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%20×40×MTY309127271405ELIORBRCB9658AW2157EATPZZAPTLOMARS453340FSTA.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%MTY309127271405ELIOR9658AW2157000721PZZAMARS742145334078832705FSTA.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C is the large dot.

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C competitors and peer comparison

How Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureFSTA.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+16.1%+5.4%6th highest of 21
6-month return+29.2%-3.1%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-2.4%-20.0%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.7%+8.1%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin11.5%5.9%6th highest of 21
Forward P/E15.9×16.1×8th cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)8.0%2.6%4th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+40.3%+11.7%highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-32.3 pp-10.3 pp3rd least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.5 pp+0.8 pp6th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA8.4×8.5×9th cheapest of 18
Net debt / EBITDA2.7×1.9×9th most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C FSTA.LUnited Kingdom$576M+29%+6%12%15.9×8.0%+40.3%
MTY Food MTY.TOCanada$600M-6%-4%16%8.2×-3.8%+18.4%
Bronco Billy 3091.TJapan$551M+41%+14%12%32.1×1.5%+11.8%
Wowprime 2727.TWTaiwan$550M-1%+10%8%12.2×-11.9%+9.0%
DPC Dash 1405.HKHong Kong$548M-34%+26%4%21.2×6.6%+36.3%
Elior ELIOR.PAFrance$544M-35%0%2%12.4×6.3%+9.2%
Black Rock Coffee Bar BRCBUnited States$538M-6%+24%3%50.1×n/an/a
Super Hi International 9658.HKHong Kong$619M-23%+11%6%18.1×-1.7%+30.7%
A&W Food Services of Canada AW.TOCanada$625M0%+3%30%14.0×2.6%-0.6%
Koshidaka 2157.TJapan$530M-6%+16%13%10.8×-9.8%+31.1%
AmRest EAT.WAPoland$529M-5%-3%4%22.9×5.1%+9.9%
Xi'an Catering 000721.SZChina$523M-20%-14%-23%n/a50.5%+6.5%
Papa John's International PZZAUnited States$650M-37%-6%5%19.7×4.8%+2.5%
Portillo's PTLOUnited States$504M+54%+3%6%31.0×n/an/a
Marston's MARS.LUnited Kingdom$497M+23%-1%22%6.2×-2.5%+11.7%
Restaurant Brands Asia RBA.NSIndia$668M+31%+16%0%n/an/an/a
Sagami 9900.TJapan$494M+13%+10%7%n/a7.7%+14.1%
Kappa.create 7421.TJapan$489M+3%-1%-1%n/a29.8%+2.4%
Hyundai Green Food 453340.KSSouth Korea$482M+22%+7%5%6.2×-18.0%+6.6%
Feastogether 7883.TWOTaiwan$479M-9%+10%9%n/a-0.2%+27.9%
OOTOYA 2705.TJapan$477M+53%+18%6%n/a10.0%+18.1%

Questions

Which companies are Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: MTY Food (MTY.TO), Bronco Billy (3091.T), Wowprime (2727.TW), DPC Dash (1405.HK), Elior (ELIOR.PA), Black Rock Coffee Bar (BRCB), Super Hi International (9658.HK), A&W Food Services of Canada (AW.TO).
Is Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.9× against a peer median of 16.1×, 8th cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +40%, so the hurdle is -32 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Fuller, Smith & Turner P.L.C stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +29.2% against -3.1% for the median peer; over one year +33.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.