Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › PCT PureCycle Technologies IncOpen in the cockpit ↗

PureCycle Technologies IncPCTCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Materials›Environmental Services

Commercializes a proprietary process to recycle polypropylene plastic waste into near-virgin-quality resin.

Momentum laggard 0
Mkt cap
$335M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$23.6M
20-day average traded
P/B
21.58×
price to book
ROE
-389.6%
delivered
Implied ROE
338.9%
what the price asks
Next earnings
124 days
10 Mar 2027
Close · USD$1.67
1D-11.4%
1W-50.5%
1M-57.6%
3M-77.0%
6M-82.5%
YTD-80.6%
1Y-83.9%
ATR %23.2%
Beta2.59
52w lowhigh88.3% off high

What PureCycle Technologies does

Commercializes a proprietary process to recycle polypropylene plastic waste into near-virgin-quality resin.

Its first plant, in Ironton, Ohio, was built to buy used polypropylene as feedstock and sell the purified resin to brand owners and converters, so margins depend on the gap between waste cost and resin price. The process was licensed in from Procter & Gamble, and more plants or licensing deals are meant to follow once the first runs reliably.

Products and services

  • Recycled polypropylene resin (UPR)
  • Licensing of purification technology

Customers

  • Consumer packaged goods companies
  • Plastics/packaging converters

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Plastics recycling technology
  • Recycled resin production/sale

What could go right

  • Brand-owner recycled-content commitments
  • Plastics regulation driving recycled-resin demand

What could go wrong

  • Plant ramp-up/execution risk
  • Capital intensity and financing needs

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how). Patented solvent-based purification process is the main differentiator versus mechanical recycling.

Headquarters: Orlando, Florida, US · Founded: 2015 · Employees: 174

Named competitors

  • Eastman Chemical EMN
  • Berry Global private or unlisted
  • Indorama Ventures private or unlisted

PureCycle Technologies at a glance

Size PureCycle Technologies (PCT) is a United States Materials company (Environmental Services) with a market value of $335M, the 3017th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $1.67 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 82.5%, against -32.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 326.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.0%); the operating margin is -1,207.3% (peer median -0.3%).

Valuation It trades at 21.58× book value against a peer median of 1.40× (most expensive of 20).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 338.9%; PureCycle Technologies delivers -389.6%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Credit PureCycle Technologies has 1 bond outstanding ($288M).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 68PCT 17
Six months, rebased to 100: PureCycle Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

PureCycle Technologies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$13.8M$8.36M$0$0$0
Revenue growth—————
Gross profit-$118M-$135M-$34.7M-$18.9M-$5.21M
EBITDA-$132M-$133M-$111M-$95.0M-$76.1M
Net income-$223M-$183M-$289M-$102M-$84.7M
Free cash flow-$212M-$184M-$200M-$249M-$353M
Capital expenditure$52.4M$40.8M$55.6M$154M$287M
Total debt$813M$724M$404M$544M$250M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

PureCycle Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-75%-50%-25%0%+25%-40%-20%0%IDRGEVOPACKLZMMNTKRYAMTROXVGZASPNCMCLUAMYNBALOYIPIASIXVHIBAKLXFRGSMCTGOPCT6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. PureCycle Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-400%-300%-200%-100%0%00×100×200×IDRGEVOPACKLZMMNTKRYAMTROXVGZASPNCMCLALOYCTGOPCTReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. PureCycle Technologies is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

-400%-200%0%200%-400%-200%0%200%IDRGEVOPACKRYAMVGZALOYPCTROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. PureCycle Technologies is the large dot.

PureCycle Technologies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (PCT vs EMN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
PureCycle Technologies PCT$335M-83%+326%-390%21.58×338.9%
Eastman Chemical EMN$7.37B-13%0%11%1.17×11.5%

How PureCycle Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

PureCycle Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasurePCTPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-57.6%-9.8%lowest of 21
6-month return-82.5%-32.6%lowest of 21
Return on equity-389.6%-14.9%lowest of 20
Price / book21.58×1.40×most expensive of 20
ROE the price implies338.9%12.4%most demanding of 20
ROE delivered-389.6%-6.6%lowest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
PureCycle Technologies PCTUnited States$335M-83%+326%-390%21.58×338.9%-389.6%
Idaho Strategic Resources IDRUnited States$330M-58%+67%26%2.74×23.1%26.4%
Gevo GEVOUnited States$344M-24%+121%-57%1.26×12.4%-57.0%
Ranpak PACKUnited States$311M-44%+8%-7%0.61×13.2%-6.6%
Lifezone Metals LZMUnited States$378M-30%+652%-17%4.24×39.2%n/a
Montauk Renewables MNTKUnited States$387M+86%+4%3%1.47×10.9%3.1%
Rayonier Advanced Materials RYAMUnited States$399M-36%+2%-242%1.25×17.5%-241.7%
Tronox TROXUnited States$401M-72%+4%-39%0.35×5.3%-39.1%
Vista Gold VGZUnited States$401M+22%n/a-26%7.91×71.2%-26.4%
Aspen Aerogels ASPNUnited States$407M-4%-49%-50%2.12×38.7%-50.4%
Caledonia Mining CMCLUnited States$412M-11%+35%25%1.40×11.0%24.6%
United States Antimony UAMYUnited States$422M-74%+36%-15%2.33×13.1%-14.9%
NioCorp Developments NBUnited States$423M-52%n/a-21%0.98×6.3%n/a
REalloys ALOYUnited States$427M-38%+21%-150%2.21×24.0%-150.2%
Intrepid Potash IPIUnited States$443M-13%+5%2%0.84×9.0%2.1%
Advansix ASIXUnited States$454M-17%+8%-3%0.58×7.7%-2.8%
Valhi VHIUnited States$456M+11%+3%-5%0.44×6.2%-4.8%
Braskem S.A. Sponsored ADR Pfd BAKUnited States$457M-70%-1%n/an/an/an/a
Luxfer LXFRUnited States$463M+11%-9%4%2.09×18.6%4.2%
Ferroglobe GSMUnited States$477M-37%+4%4%0.61×7.8%3.9%
Contango Silver & Gold CTGOUnited States$520M-43%n/a-24%1.52×8.1%-23.7%

PureCycle Technologies bonds and credit

PureCycle Technologies has 1 bond outstanding with $288M face value.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are PureCycle Technologies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Eastman Chemical (EMN), Berry Global (private or unlisted), Indorama Ventures (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Idaho Strategic Resources (IDR), Gevo (GEVO), Ranpak (PACK), Lifezone Metals (LZM), Montauk Renewables (MNTK), Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM).
Is PureCycle Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 21.58× against a peer median of 1.40×, most expensive of 20 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 338.9%; PureCycle Technologies delivers -389.6%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has PureCycle Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -82.5% against -32.6% for the median peer; over one year -83.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.