Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › OXB.L Oxford BioMedica plcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Oxford BioMedica plcOXB.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Health Care›Biotechnology
Momentum neutral 48
Mkt cap
$892M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
55%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.81M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-33.5 pp
WACC 16.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
160 days
15 Apr 2027
Close · GBP£546.00
1D-0.7%
1W+1.3%
1M+6.4%
3M+14.1%
6M-14.0%
YTD-11.5%
1Y-12.1%
ATR %4.7%
52w lowhigh43.2% off high

What Oxford BioMedica does

Employees: 986

Oxford BioMedica at a glance

Size Oxford BioMedica (OXB.L) is a United Kingdom Health Care company (Biotechnology) with a market value of $892M, the 227th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £546.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 14.0%, against -12.2% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.2%); the operating margin is -18.2% (peer median -27.1%).

Valuation It trades at 4.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 8.8× (5th cheapest of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 33.5 points below its cost of capital (16.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 15 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 89OXB.L 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Oxford BioMedica against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Oxford BioMedica financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£175M£169M£129M£89.5M£140M
Revenue growth—+31%+44%-36%—
Gross profit£62.7M£65.3M£52.4M£39.2M£69.1M
EBITDA-£13.3M-£9.12M-£23.3M-£60.1M-£28.3M
Net income-£40.7M-£30.1M-£43.2M-£157M-£39.2M
Free cash flow-£32.5M-£6.46M-£58.1M-£38.2M-£33.0M
Capital expenditure£10.4M£4.76M£7.50M£9.83M£16.3M
Total debtn/a£148M£109M£111M£114M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Oxford BioMedica competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-25%0%+25%GLUEIVA2160MGTXSNDX98874587PRMEJBIO600195ANRO301333301520688253VSTMOXB.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Oxford BioMedica is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+1,000%+2,000%+3,000%+4,000%0×5,000×10,000×15,000×GLUEIVA2160MGTXVSTMOXB.LRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Oxford BioMedica is the large dot.

Oxford BioMedica competitors and peer comparison

How Oxford BioMedica compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Oxford BioMedica against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureOXB.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+6.4%-5.4%4th highest of 21
6-month return-14.0%-12.2%10th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-43.2%-40.0%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.0%+0.2%5th highest of 18
Operating margin-18.2%-27.1%8th highest of 19
EV / Sales4.3×8.8×5th cheapest of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-33.5 pp-7.5 pp3rd lowest of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Oxford BioMedica OXB.LUnited Kingdom$892M-14%+16%-18%4.3×n/an/a
Monte Rosa Therapeutics GLUEUnited States$902M-45%-84%-633%11.1×n/an/a
Inventiva IVA.PAFrance$912M-29%-100%-307,063%14,560.9×n/an/a
GNI 2160.TJapan$866M-29%+10%-24%5.7×n/an/a
MeiraGTx MGTXUnited States$864M-8%+948%46%2.1×-9.9%+39.2%
Odyssey Therapeutics ODTXUnited States$924Mn/a-33%-5,415%208.9×n/an/a
Syndax Pharmaceuticals SNDXUnited States$859M-56%+160%-62%3.5×n/an/a
Nanjing Leads Biolabs 9887.HKHong Kong$927M-54%n/a-108%26.5×n/an/a
Peptidream 4587.TJapan$856M-10%+1%-25%6.6×n/an/a
Prime Medicine PRMEUnited States$843M+45%-18%-4,825%211.3×n/an/a
Jade Biosciences JBIOUnited States$958M-42%n/an/an/an/an/a
China Animal Husbandry Industry 600195.SSChina$960M-17%+1%2%1.4×6.6%+4.4%
Wuhan Keqian Biology 688526.SSChina$814M-19%-22%20%4.7×8.8%+2.4%
Alto Neuroscience ANROUnited States$987M+4%n/an/an/an/an/a
R&G PharmaStudies 301333.SZChina$803M-12%+21%11%3.9×20.1%+11.8%
Anhui Wanbang Pharmaceutical Technology 301520.SZChina$803M+91%-15%-8%17.9×48.8%+14.7%
Chengdu Kanghua Biological Products Co. Td Class 1 300841.SZChina$995M-11%0%22%4.7×11.1%+2.3%
Beijing SL Pharmaceutical 002038.SZChina$793M-21%-4%-119%7.6×-12.3%-10.9%
Changchun BCHT Biotechnology 688276.SSChina$1.00B-11%+2%-29%10.0×n/an/a
Innovita Biological Technology 688253.SSChina$1.02B-4%-28%11%16.3×42.9%-16.6%
Verastem VSTMUnited States$1.02B+72%+3,996%-183%11.1×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Oxford BioMedica's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Monte Rosa Therapeutics (GLUE), Inventiva (IVA.PA), GNI (2160.T), MeiraGTx (MGTX), Odyssey Therapeutics (ODTX), Syndax Pharmaceuticals (SNDX), Nanjing Leads Biolabs (9887.HK), Peptidream (4587.T).
Is Oxford BioMedica expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 4.3× against a peer median of 8.8×, 5th cheapest of 19 in its peer set.
How has Oxford BioMedica stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -14.0% against -12.2% for the median peer; over one year -12.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.