Loading…

Orkla ASAORK.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Consumer Staples›Food: Specialty/Candy

Norwegian branded consumer goods conglomerate selling food, snacks and personal-care products across the Nordics.

≈ A Norwegian General Mills/Church & Dwight hybridMomentum neutral 52
Mkt cap
$10.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
74%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.8 pp
WACC 5.7%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · NOKNOK 102.60
1D+0.7%
1W+4.8%
1M+10.4%
3M-1.2%
6M-6.4%
YTD-8.8%
1Y-1.1%
ATR %1.6%
52w lowhigh21.8% off high

What Orkla does

Norwegian branded consumer goods conglomerate selling food, snacks and personal-care products across the Nordics.

Sells everyday food, snacks and household and personal-care brands through grocery chains, many of them first or second in their small Nordic markets, which gives it leverage but also makes it depend on a few large retailers for shelf space. Its large holding in Jotun, the paint maker, is accounted as an associate, adding its share of Jotun's profits.

In one line: A Norwegian General Mills/Church & Dwight hybrid.

Products and services

  • Food brands (Nordics/Baltics)
  • Confectionery & snacks
  • Home & personal care
  • Investment portfolio (Jotun stake)

Customers

  • Grocery retailers
  • Consumers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer staples
  • Branded packaged goods
  • Food, snacks, home & personal care…

What could go right

  • Nordic market share/price realization
  • Bolt-on brand acquisitions

What could go wrong

  • Input cost inflation
  • Private-label competition

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, scale). Portfolio of #1/#2 local Nordic food and household brands with strong retail distribution.

Headquarters: Oslo, Norway · Founded: 1654 · Employees: 18,616

Named competitors

Orkla at a glance

Size Orkla (ORK.OL) is a Norway Consumer Staples company (Food: Specialty/Candy) with a market value of $10.8B, the 11th largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 102.60 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 6.4%, against +1.2% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 0.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.7%); the operating margin is 10.5% (peer median 11.2%).

Valuation It trades at 15.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.0× (7th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.8 points above its cost of capital (5.7% WACC).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 102ORK.OL 94
Six months, rebased to 100: Orkla against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Orkla financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 70.8BNOK 71.5BNOK 69.3BNOK 67.8BNOK 58.4B
Revenue growth—+3%+2%+16%—
Gross profitNOK 7.53BNOK 17.1BNOK 16.4BNOK 15.8BNOK 14.6B
EBITDANOK 10.1BNOK 10.4BNOK 9.79BNOK 9.58BNOK 9.67B
Net incomeNOK 6.51BNOK 6.53BNOK 6.06BNOK 5.20BNOK 5.02B
Free cash flowNOK 6.62BNOK 6.72BNOK 7.62BNOK 4.33BNOK 2.41B
Capital expenditureNOK 2.76BNOK 2.55BNOK 2.03BNOK 2.92BNOK 2.82B
Total debtNOK 22.7BNOK 16.7BNOK 18.5BNOK 20.8BNOK 19.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Orkla competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%2801TATACONSUMBRITANNIAMKCSJMBARNDARLW2269CPB2875INGR2897BCPC2212SXT600298AAKLISN2802ORK.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Orkla is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%+15%10×20×30×40×2801TATACONSUMBRITANNIAMKCSJMBARNDARLW2269CPB2875INGR2897BCPCSXT600298AAKLISN2802ORK.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Orkla is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%2801TATACONSUMBRITANNIAMKCSJMBARNDARLWCPB2875INGRBCPCAAK2802ORK.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Orkla is the large dot.

Orkla competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ORK.OL vs NESN.SW vs ULVR.L vs KHC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Orkla ORK.OL$10.8B-6%0%10%15.5×-1.1%
Nestle NESN.SW$266B+11%-2%16%19.0×1.3%
Unilever ULVR.L$143B+15%-20%20%18.4×8.0%
Kraft Heinz KHC$29.2B+5%-2%17%12.5×-3.9%

How Orkla compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Orkla against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureORK.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+10.4%+4.8%6th highest of 21
6-month return-6.4%+1.2%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-21.8%-16.5%9th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-0.4%+6.7%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.5%11.2%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E15.5×18.0×7th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.1%3.4%8th least demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.7%+8.1%9th highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.8 pp-6.4 pp5th least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.8 pp+3.6 pp10th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA12.4×11.4×8th most expensive of 20
Net debt / EBITDA2.1×1.1×8th most indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Orkla ORK.OLNorway$10.8B-6%0%10%15.5×-1.1%+8.7%
Kikkoman 2801.TJapan$10.9B+24%+9%11%24.8×8.8%+11.2%
Tata Consumer Products TATACONSUM.NSIndia$11.4B-6%+15%11%55.5×42.8%+11.8%
Britannia Industries BRITANNIA.NSIndia$12.1B-18%+7%17%41.7×28.9%+7.8%
McCormick & MKCUnited States$13.0B0%+13%17%15.9×3.2%+4.1%
J.M. Smucker Company (The) SJMUnited States$13.9B+33%+5%19%12.9×-7.1%+2.5%
Barry Callebaut BARN.SWSwitzerland$8.33B+5%+9%5%23.7×-8.4%+16.5%
Darling Ingredients DARUnited States$7.92B-20%+16%9%7.3×9.0%+11.4%
Lamb Weston LWUnited States$7.61B+31%+3%10%16.6×4.0%+12.5%
Meiji 2269.TJapan$7.35B+14%+4%8%17.2×n/an/a
Campbell's CPBUnited States$6.90B+11%-5%11%13.7×-3.6%+2.8%
Toyo Suisan Kaisha 2875.TJapan$6.74B-4%+7%17%14.5×-5.0%+9.5%
Ingredion INGRUnited States$5.78B-15%-1%12%9.7×-7.8%+3.8%
Nissin Foods 2897.TJapan$5.73B+9%+5%6%17.9×n/an/a
Balchem BCPCUnited States$5.54B+8%+9%22%30.9×14.5%+8.1%
Yamazaki Baking 2212.TJapan$5.08B+21%+5%5%18.0×-3.3%+5.3%
Sensient Technologies SXTUnited States$5.07B+1%+10%15%25.0×n/an/a
Angel Yeast 600298.SSChina$4.97B+2%+15%11%19.1×4.1%+13.4%
Aak AAK.STSweden$4.88B-30%-1%10%13.6×-6.0%+10.5%
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli LISN.SWSwitzerland$24.6B-8%+4%16%28.2×3.4%+8.1%
Ajinomoto 2802.TJapan$25.3B-16%+7%11%29.4×19.2%+8.1%

Questions

Who are Orkla's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nestle (NESN.SW), Unilever (ULVR.L), Kraft Heinz (KHC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Kikkoman (2801.T), Tata Consumer Products (TATACONSUM.NS), Britannia Industries (BRITANNIA.NS), McCormick & (MKC), J.M. Smucker Company (The) (SJM), Barry Callebaut (BARN.SW).
Is Orkla expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.5× against a peer median of 18.0×, 7th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Orkla stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -6.4% against +1.2% for the median peer; over one year -1.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.