Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › NP Neptune Insurance Holdings, Inc. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Neptune Insurance Holdings, Inc. Class ANPCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Financials›Insurance Brokers/Services

Managing general agency providing AI-underwritten private flood insurance to homeowners across the United States.

Momentum neutral 40
Mkt cap
$3.86B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
39%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.5M
20-day average traded
P/B
n/a
price to book
ROE
n/a
delivered
Implied ROE
n/a
what the price asks
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · USD$27.91
1D-0.1%
1W-4.3%
1M-1.9%
3M-10.5%
6M-6.7%
YTD-4.3%
1Y+9.0%
ATR %4.4%
Beta0.18
52w lowhigh20.6% off high

What Neptune Insurance does

Managing general agency providing AI-underwritten private flood insurance to homeowners across the United States.

Acts as an agent rather than an insurer: it sells flood policies through independent insurance agents, mostly keeps a commission and policy fees, and passes the claims risk to insurers and reinsurers (companies that back insurers' losses). Earnings follow premium volume, though a poor loss record would strain its carrier relationships.

Products and services

  • Private flood insurance policies
  • AI-based flood risk underwriting

Customers

  • Homeowners
  • Mortgage lenders requiring flood coverage

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Insurance
  • Specialty flood insurance underwriting
  • Homeowners and mortgage lenders

What could go right

  • Private flood market growth vs. NFIP
  • Climate-driven flood insurance demand

What could go wrong

  • Catastrophe/climate loss volatility
  • Reinsurance cost exposure

Moat: narrow (data, IP / patents, regulatory licence). Proprietary flood-risk modeling and underwriting data differentiate pricing versus the government NFIP program.

Headquarters: St. Petersburg, Florida, United States · Founded: 2015 · Employees: 62

Named competitors

Neptune Insurance at a glance

Size Neptune Insurance (NP) is a United States Financials company (Insurance Brokers/Services) with a market value of $3.86B, the 1373rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $27.91 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 6.7%, against +44.0% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 33.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.0%); the operating margin is 41.5% (peer median 19.1%).

Short interest Short interest is 2.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 146NP 91
Six months, rebased to 100: Neptune Insurance against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Neptune Insurance financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$197M$160M$119M$84.9M
Revenue growth—+34%+41%—
Gross profit$134M$107M$81.0M$56.7M
EBITDA$85.8M$83.6M$71.5M$47.6M
Net income$44.7M$37.4M$34.6M$17.9M
Free cash flow$82.0M$51.7M$49.9M$18.6M
Capital expenditure$4.27M$3.98M$3.71M$4.03M
Total debt$215M$240M$134M$175M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Neptune Insurance competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%+60%0%+10%+20%CRVLSDFBWINAUBGSHDTWFGRYANTRYGNP6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Neptune Insurance is the large dot.

Neptune Insurance competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (NP vs AIZ vs HCI vs PLMR)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROE
Neptune Insurance NP$3.86B-7%+34%n/an/an/a
Assurant AIZ$15.1B+29%+9%44%2.60×14.6%
HCI HCI$2.31B+22%+23%34%2.15×17.3%
Palomar PLMR$4.10B+37%+60%22%4.16×17.0%
Chubb CB$139B+15%+6%15%1.91×9.4%

How Neptune Insurance compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Neptune Insurance against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureNPPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.9%+9.9%lowest of 9
6-month return-6.7%+44.0%lowest of 9
Trailing P/E90.8×38.8×most expensive of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Neptune Insurance NPUnited States$3.86B-7%+34%n/an/an/an/a
CorVel CRVLUnited States$4.20B+42%+8%31%10.74×80.5%30.6%
Steadfast SDF.AXAustralia$4.46B+46%+17%11%2.73×14.3%11.3%
Baldwin Insurance BWINUnited States$4.48B+58%+19%-11%3.48×26.6%-10.7%
AUB AUB.AXAustralia$2.75B+26%+6%5%2.11×17.1%5.4%
Goosehead Insurance GSHDUnited States$1.97B+36%+18%n/an/an/an/a
TWFG TWFGUnited States$1.52B+47%+33%14%7.79×29.2%13.6%
Ryan Specialty RYANUnited States$12.0B+52%+9%19%12.86×61.4%19.4%
Tryg A/S TRYG.CODenmark$14.2B+10%+5%12%2.61×8.1%12.4%

Questions

Who are Neptune Insurance's main competitors?
Named competitors: FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (private or unlisted), Assurant (flood) (AIZ), TypTap (HCI Group) (HCI), Aon Edge (private or unlisted), Palomar Holdings (PLMR), Chubb (CB). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes CorVel (CRVL), Steadfast (SDF.AX), Baldwin Insurance (BWIN), AUB (AUB.AX), Goosehead Insurance (GSHD), TWFG (TWFG).
How has Neptune Insurance stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -6.7% against +44.0% for the median peer; over one year +9.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.