Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MSM MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. Class AMSMCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Distributes metalworking and maintenance/repair (MRO) products to manufacturers, with technical and inventory-management services.

Momentum neutral 45
Mkt cap
$6.33B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
82%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$127M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+6.9 pp
WACC 8.7%
Hurdle
+5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
68 days
13 Jan 2027
Close · USD$113.27
1D+2.1%
1W-6.4%
1M-12.1%
3M-7.9%
6M+8.6%
YTD+34.7%
1Y+30.7%
ATR %3.9%
Beta0.78
52w lowhigh15.4% off high

What MSC Industrial Direct does

Distributes metalworking and maintenance/repair (MRO) products to manufacturers, with technical and inventory-management services.

A distributor that buys products from tool makers and resells them at a mark-up, adding a service layer of on-site vending machines and stocked-for-you inventory programs at larger plant customers, which keeps orders flowing. Profit depends on factory activity and on holding its pricing against suppliers' costs.

Products and services

  • MRO/metalworking product distribution
  • Vendor-managed inventory services
  • Metalworking technical support

Customers

  • Manufacturers
  • Machine shops
  • Industrial maintenance customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Distribution
  • Metalworking & MRO

What could go right

  • Manufacturing production growth
  • Cross-selling technical services

What could go wrong

  • Industrial production cyclicality
  • Price competition

Moat: narrow (distribution, process know-how). Deep metalworking technical expertise and vendor-managed inventory programs create switching costs.

Headquarters: Melville, New York, USA · Founded: 1941 · Employees: 7,028

Named competitors

MSC Industrial Direct at a glance

Size MSC Industrial Direct (MSM) is a United States Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $6.33B, the 1025th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $113.27 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 8.6%, against +0.1% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.4%); the operating margin is 9.2% (peer median 9.0%).

Valuation It trades at 20.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.4× (9th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.9 points above its cost of capital (8.7% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 4.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MSM 106Peer median 100
Six months, rebased to 100: MSC Industrial Direct against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

MSC Industrial Direct financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-08-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$4.01B$4.01B$3.77B$3.82B$4.01B
Revenue growth—+6%-1%-5%—
Gross profit$1.64B$1.64B$1.53B$1.57B$1.64B
EBITDA$471M$474M$404M$489M$567M
Net income$223M$223M$199M$259M$343M
Free cash flow$225M$225M$241M$311M$607M
Capital expenditure$81.3M$81.3M$92.8M$99.4M$92.5M
Total debt$528M$528M$539M$568M$521M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MSC Industrial Direct competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%+10%VPKIMCD3064443060REHBEIJ-BFTTSITERS1GRGDADDT-BCNM2207RUIBNR600415GEIAIT688433MSM6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. MSC Industrial Direct is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%10×20×30×VPKIMCD3064443060REHBEIJ-BSITEGRGDADDT-BCNM2207RUIBNR600415GEIAIT600704688433MSMRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MSC Industrial Direct is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%VPKIMCD3064443060REHBEIJ-BFTTSITERS1ADDT-BCNM2207RUIBNRGEIAIT600704MSMGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. MSC Industrial Direct is the large dot.

MSC Industrial Direct competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MSM vs GWW vs FAST vs AIT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
MSC Industrial Direct MSM$6.33B+9%+6%9%20.1×9.0%
W. W. Grainger GWW$67.9B+17%+9%17%28.2×11.9%
Fastenal FAST$60.8B+20%+14%21%38.3×14.2%
Applied Industrial Technologies AIT$10.3B-8%+8%11%23.0×8.6%

How MSC Industrial Direct compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MSC Industrial Direct against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMSMPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-12.1%+3.7%5th lowest of 21
6-month return+8.6%+0.1%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-15.4%-15.3%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.4%+4.4%10th highest of 21
Operating margin9.2%9.0%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E20.1×18.4×9th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.0%9.2%10th least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.3%+11.3%3rd lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+4.6 pp-2.4 pp5th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+6.9 pp+1.3 pp6th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA14.4×12.6×7th most expensive of 16
Net debt / EBITDA1.0×2.4×4th least indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
MSC Industrial Direct MSMUnited States$6.33B+9%+6%9%20.1×9.0%+4.3%
Royal Vopak VPK.ASNetherlands$6.51B+14%+1%29%15.5×8.8%+1.8%
Imcd IMCD.ASNetherlands$6.80B+7%+3%8%18.2×10.9%+11.5%
MonotaRO 3064.TJapan$7.04B+22%+19%14%29.6×9.7%+16.2%
Hdhms 443060.KSSouth Korea$5.28B-39%+20%16%23.0×3.0%+14.5%
Reece REH.AXAustralia$7.83B+44%+4%6%35.5×24.2%+8.4%
Beijer Ref BEIJ-B.STSweden$8.09B+27%+4%10%28.0×14.0%+21.4%
Finning International FTT.TOCanada$8.20B-9%0%8%17.5×10.1%+11.3%
SiteOne Landscape Supply SITEUnited States$4.86B-7%+3%5%24.4×18.4%+11.7%
RS Group PLC RS1.LUnited Kingdom$4.85B+33%-1%8%18.6×15.1%+7.5%
Groupe Dynamite GRGD.TOCanada$4.79B-33%+37%32%17.6×22.8%n/a
Addtech ADDT-B.STSweden$8.66B-2%+4%13%30.7×19.3%+14.9%
Core & Main CNMUnited States$8.76B-6%-1%10%14.3×5.3%+16.0%
Hotai Motor 2207.TWTaiwan$8.90B+10%+8%11%13.2×1.5%+3.9%
Rubis SCA RUI.PAFrance$4.10B0%+11%7%10.3×3.1%+10.9%
Brenntag BNR.DEGermany$10.0B0%-5%5%14.5×1.9%+5.2%
Zhejiang China Commodities City 600415.SSChina$10.0B-7%+22%22%14.4×n/an/a
Gibson Energy GEI.TOCanada$3.87B+13%+26%3%19.5×6.4%+16.7%
Applied Industrial Technologies AITUnited States$10.3B-8%+8%11%23.0×8.6%+8.9%
Wuchan Zhongda 600704.SSChina$3.86B0%+3%1%7.2×-2.5%+8.1%
Farsoon Technologies 688433.SSChina$3.76B-24%+52%5%234.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are MSC Industrial Direct's main competitors?
Named competitors: W.W. Grainger (GWW), Fastenal (FAST), Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Royal Vopak (VPK.AS), Imcd (IMCD.AS), MonotaRO (3064.T), Hdhms (443060.KS), Reece (REH.AX), Beijer Ref (BEIJ-B.ST).
Is MSC Industrial Direct expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.1× against a peer median of 18.4×, 9th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +5 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has MSC Industrial Direct stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +8.6% against +0.1% for the median peer; over one year +30.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.