Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MSGR MSG Rangers Corp Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

MSG Rangers Corp Class AMSGRCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Communication Services›Movies/Entertainment
Momentum leader 100
Mkt cap
$2.37B
US dollars, full cap
$/day
$27.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-14.9 pp
WACC 7.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · USD$240.80
1D+7.3%
1W+10.2%
1M+1,664.1%
3M+1,424.8%
6M+1,623.7%
YTD+1,631.1%
1Y+1,623.1%
ATR %7.0%
Beta2.96
52w lowhigh2.9% off high

What MSG Rangers does

Employees: 147

MSG Rangers at a glance

Size MSG Rangers (MSGR) is a United States Communication Services company (Movies/Entertainment) with a market value of $2.37B, the 1691st largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $240.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 1,623.7%, against +1.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.5%); the operating margin is -8.7% (peer median 8.9%).

Valuation It trades at 8.1× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.6× (3rd most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.9 points below its cost of capital (7.6% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $288M at 30 Sep 2026. Backlog detail →

Relative performance

05001000150011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MSGR 1729Peer median 102
Six months, rebased to 100: MSG Rangers against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

MSG Rangers financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025
Revenuen/a$337M$332M
Revenue growth—+2%—
Gross profitn/a$72.3M$73.1M
EBITDAn/a-$26.9M-$20.8M
Net incomen/a-$26.4M-$23.0M
Free cash flown/a-$51.2M-$3.71M
Capital expendituren/a$634,000$472,000
Total debtn/a$348M$352M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MSG Rangers competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+500%+1,000%+1,500%0%+500%+1,000%+1,500%300182PFOCUS601595MSGR6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. MSG Rangers is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×10×20×300182PFOCUS601595468003263001449605300133AMC000069002739PRKSEVTITV1060BATRAPVRINOX603103MSGEMSGRRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MSG Rangers is the large dot.

MSG Rangers competitors and peer comparison

How MSG Rangers compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MSG Rangers against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMSGRPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1,664.1%+8.0%highest of 21
6-month return+1,623.7%+1.5%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-2.9%-18.9%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.6%+4.5%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin-8.7%8.9%5th lowest of 21
EV / Sales8.1×3.6×3rd most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-14.9 pp-1.1 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
MSG Rangers MSGRUnited States$2.37B+1,624%+2%-9%8.1×n/an/a
Beijing Jetsen Technology 300182.SZChina$2.36B+6%-23%9%7.7×n/an/a
Prime Focus PFOCUS.NSIndia$2.36B-7%+29%16%4.5×26.0%+12.6%
Shanghai Film 601595.SSChina$2.40B+47%-18%-2%22.6×57.0%+24.4%
ROUND ONE 4680.TJapan$2.22B+42%+21%15%2.5×4.3%+25.5%
China Star Entertainment 0326.HKHong Kong$2.54B-10%-69%-157%90.0×n/an/a
Songcheng Performance Development 300144.SZChina$2.17B-29%-15%37%6.0×5.6%+20.1%
Toei 9605.TJapan$2.77B+5%+3%20%2.3×-3.3%+11.5%
Zhejiang Huace Film & TV 300133.SZChina$2.79B+15%+44%8%6.4×n/an/a
AMC Entertainment AMCUnited States$2.80B+109%+6%5%1.9×n/an/a
Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town 000069.SZChina$2.00B-25%-22%-32%4.2×1.1%-17.4%
Ruyi Film Entertainment 002739.SZChina$2.94B-9%-8%3%2.3×6.7%+15.4%
United Parks & Resorts PRKSUnited States$1.81B+2%-4%21%2.5×0.2%+30.9%
EVT EVT.AXAustralia$1.78B+39%+7%9%3.0×21.0%+18.0%
Itv ITV.LUnited Kingdom$3.23B-16%+2%13%0.9×-2.8%+4.8%
Damai Entertainment 1060.HKHong Kong$1.74B-25%+22%6%0.7×-9.1%+22.0%
Atlanta Braves BATRAUnited States$3.23B+1%+6%-9%5.3×n/an/a
PVR Inox PVRINOX.NSIndia$1.63B+47%+14%16%2.9×15.7%+88.3%
Hengdian Entertainment 603103.SSChina$1.62B-18%-27%-10%6.7×36.1%+18.3%
Madison Square Garden Entertainment MSGEUnited States$3.65B+18%+16%17%4.1×5.0%+66.9%
Banijay BNJ.ASNetherlands$3.83B-13%+7%14%1.8×-4.5%+18.1%

MSG Rangers backlog

MSG Rangers reported $288M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026.

Questions

Which companies are MSG Rangers's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Beijing Jetsen Technology (300182.SZ), Prime Focus (PFOCUS.NS), Shanghai Film (601595.SS), ROUND ONE (4680.T), China Star Entertainment (0326.HK), Songcheng Performance Development (300144.SZ), Toei (9605.T), Zhejiang Huace Film & TV (300133.SZ).
Is MSG Rangers expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 8.1× against a peer median of 3.6×, 3rd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has MSG Rangers stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +1,623.7% against +1.5% for the median peer; over one year +1,623.1%.
What is MSG Rangers's backlog?
MSG Rangers's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $288M at 30 Sep 2026.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.