Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MSGE Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.MSGECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Communication Services›Movies/Entertainment

Owns iconic live-entertainment venues (Madison Square Garden, Radio City Music Hall) and the Tao Group nightlife business.

Momentum strong 64
Mkt cap
$3.65B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$28.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
32.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+8.5 pp
WACC 7.1%
Hurdle
-62 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · USD$77.06
1D+2.2%
1W-4.1%
1M-5.6%
3M-1.3%
6M+18.1%
YTD+43.0%
1Y+73.0%
ATR %3.8%
Beta0.74
52w lowhigh14.8% off high

What Madison Square Garden Entertainment does

Owns iconic live-entertainment venues (Madison Square Garden, Radio City Music Hall) and the Tao Group nightlife business.

Earns ticket revenue and a share of food, drink and merchandise sales from events at its venues, venue-use fees from the Knicks and Rangers teams, which sit in a separate company, sponsorship income, and seasonal revenue from the Christmas Spectacular and Tao's nightlife venues. It has been a separate company since the 2023 spin-off from Sphere Entertainment.

Products and services

  • Venue operations (concerts, events)
  • Christmas Spectacular/Rockettes
  • Tao Group Hospitality (nightlife/dining)

Customers

  • Concertgoers/event attendees
  • Touring artists/promoters
  • Nightlife/dining guests

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication services
  • Movies/entertainment
  • Live entertainment venues

What could go right

  • Strong touring/concert demand
  • Tao Group expansion into new markets

What could go wrong

  • Dependent on artist tour schedules
  • Event/travel demand sensitivity

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, installed base). Irreplaceable, iconic venues in prime markets, but exposed to touring/event booking cycles.

Headquarters: New York, New York, United States · Founded: 2020 · Employees: 6,260

Named competitors

Madison Square Garden Entertainment at a glance

Size Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSGE) is a United States Communication Services company (Movies/Entertainment) with a market value of $3.65B, the 1403rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $77.06 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 18.1%, against +10.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.9%); the operating margin is 17.3% (peer median 7.3%).

Valuation It trades at 32.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 34.1× (8th cheapest of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +67%, so the hurdle is -62 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.5 points above its cost of capital (7.1% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $772M at 30 Sep 2026, up 24% on a year earlier — 0.6 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Madison Square Garden Entertainment has 1 bond outstanding ($259M).

Short interest Short interest is 6.1% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MSGE 121Peer median 105
Six months, rebased to 100: Madison Square Garden Entertainment against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Madison Square Garden Entertainment financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$1.12B$1.06B$943M$959M$851M
Revenue growth—+13%-2%+13%—
Gross profit$457M$422M$349M$337M$291M
EBITDA$250M$226M$192M$183M$184M
Net income$96.7M$66.2M$37.4M$144M$76.6M
Free cash flown/a$323M$93.1M$87.1M$121M
Capital expendituren/a$28.3M$22.2M$24.2M$15.2M
Total debt$1.16B$1.18B$1.20B$1.07B$903M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Madison Square Garden Entertainment competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+20%+40%+60%BNJMANUBATRAITV4816LION600977CNK002739AMC3001339605BFT0326300251601595MSGRMSGE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Madison Square Garden Entertainment is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×100×200×BNJMANUITV4816LION600977002739300133BFT300251601595300182G13MSGERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Madison Square Garden Entertainment is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%BNJMANUITV4816LION600977CNK0027399605BFT601595PFOCUSMSGEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Madison Square Garden Entertainment is the large dot.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MSGE vs LYV vs SPHR vs EVD.DE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Madison Square Garden Entertainment MSGE$3.65B+18%+16%17%32.1×5.0%
Live Nation Entertainment LYV$41.3B+7%+11%6%125.4×18.6%
Sphere Entertainment SPHR$4.31B-10%+17%-2%n/a7.0%
CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA EVD.DE$6.68B+11%+14%15%18.4×6.8%

How Madison Square Garden Entertainment compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Madison Square Garden Entertainment against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMSGEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.6%+13.5%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return+18.1%+10.4%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-14.8%-15.7%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.4%+1.9%4th highest of 21
Operating margin17.3%7.3%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E32.1×34.1×8th cheapest of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.0%2.4%7th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+66.9%+12.7%highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-61.9 pp-12.2 ppleast demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+8.5 pp-1.2 pp3rd highest of 21
EV / EBITDA18.5×10.2×most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA3.9×2.8×4th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Madison Square Garden Entertainment MSGEUnited States$3.65B+18%+16%17%32.1×5.0%+66.9%
Banijay BNJ.ASNetherlands$3.83B-13%+7%14%8.0×-4.5%+18.1%
Manchester United MANUUnited States$3.90B+15%+5%-2%142.1×18.3%+6.5%
Atlanta Braves BATRAUnited States$3.23B+1%+6%-9%n/an/an/a
Itv ITV.LUnited Kingdom$3.23B-16%+2%13%8.3×-2.8%+4.8%
Toei Animation 4816.TJapan$4.17B+23%-2%31%27.9×0.5%+12.7%
Lionsgate Studios LIONUnited States$4.24B+16%-8%6%52.8×18.6%-8.0%
China Film 600977.SSChina$4.48B+16%0%-9%141.5×-7.1%+10.4%
Cinemark CNKUnited States$4.51B+44%+13%15%14.8×2.4%+35.3%
Ruyi Film Entertainment 002739.SZChina$2.94B-9%-8%3%34.1×6.7%+15.4%
AMC Entertainment AMCUnited States$2.80B+109%+6%5%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Huace Film & TV 300133.SZChina$2.79B+15%+44%8%50.4×n/an/a
Toei 9605.TJapan$2.77B+5%+3%20%23.5×-3.3%+11.5%
Benefit Systems BFT.WAPoland$5.18B+54%+40%19%23.7×13.4%+34.3%
China Star Entertainment 0326.HKHong Kong$2.54B-10%-69%-157%n/an/an/a
Beijing Enlight Media 300251.SZChina$5.49B-16%-71%-57%179.5×n/an/a
Shanghai Film 601595.SSChina$2.40B+47%-18%-2%264.9×57.0%+24.4%
MSG Rangers MSGRUnited States$2.37B+1,624%+2%-9%n/an/an/a
Beijing Jetsen Technology 300182.SZChina$2.36B+6%-23%9%37.1×n/an/a
Prime Focus PFOCUS.NSIndia$2.36B-7%+29%16%n/a26.0%+12.6%
Genting Singapore G13.SISingapore$5.76B-10%+2%15%19.1×-5.0%+18.2%

Madison Square Garden Entertainment bonds and credit

Madison Square Garden Entertainment has 1 bond outstanding with $259M face value.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Madison Square Garden Entertainment backlog

Madison Square Garden Entertainment reported $772M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 24% from a year earlier and up 5% from the previous quarter. That is 0.6 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 1.19.

Questions

Who are Madison Square Garden Entertainment's main competitors?
Named competitors: Live Nation Entertainment (LYV), Sphere Entertainment (SPHR), AEG (private or unlisted), CTS Eventim (EVD.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Banijay (BNJ.AS), Manchester United (MANU), Atlanta Braves (BATRA), Itv (ITV.L), Toei Animation (4816.T), Lionsgate Studios (LION).
Is Madison Square Garden Entertainment expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 32.1× against a peer median of 34.1×, 8th cheapest of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +67%, so the hurdle is -62 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Madison Square Garden Entertainment stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +18.1% against +10.4% for the median peer; over one year +73.0%.
What is Madison Square Garden Entertainment's backlog?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $772M at 30 Sep 2026, +24% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.