Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MANU Manchester United Plc Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Manchester United Plc Class AMANUCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Communication Services›Movies/Entertainment

English Premier League football club earning revenue from matchday, broadcasting rights and sponsorship/merchandising.

Momentum strong 77
Mkt cap
$3.90B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
68%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.71M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
142.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-9.3 pp
WACC 8.0%
Hurdle
+12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · USD$22.61
1D+1.2%
1W+7.4%
1M+11.3%
3M+4.2%
6M+14.8%
YTD+42.0%
1Y+44.2%
ATR %2.9%
Beta0.72
52w lowhigh7.5% off high

What Manchester United does

English Premier League football club earning revenue from matchday, broadcasting rights and sponsorship/merchandising.

Sponsorship and retail deals carry the most revenue; broadcasting income depends on league position and on playing in European competitions, and matchday income on Old Trafford's capacity. The Glazer family keeps control through high-vote shares, while INEOS, Jim Ratcliffe's chemicals group, owns a minority stake and has run football operations since 2024.

Products and services

  • Matchday (ticketing, hospitality)
  • Broadcasting rights
  • Sponsorship & retail/merchandising

Customers

  • Fans/ticket holders
  • Broadcasters (Premier League/UEFA)
  • Sponsors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication services
  • Movies/entertainment
  • Professional sports team

What could go right

  • New stadium and matchday revenue growth
  • Champions League qualification

What could go wrong

  • On-pitch results volatility
  • Premier League broadcast deal dependence

Moat: narrow (brand, scale). One of the world's most recognized football brands, but league revenue-sharing limits control.

Headquarters: Manchester, United Kingdom · Founded: 1878

Named competitors

Manchester United at a glance

Size Manchester United (MANU) is a United States Communication Services company (Movies/Entertainment) with a market value of $3.90B, the 1364th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $22.61 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 14.8%, against +10.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.9%); the operating margin is -1.8% (peer median 8.5%).

Valuation It trades at 142.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 32.1× (3rd most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.3 points below its cost of capital (8.0% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 5.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MANU 120Peer median 105
Six months, rebased to 100: Manchester United against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Manchester United financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$909M$910M$862M$833M$780M
Revenue growth—+5%+4%+7%—
Gross profit-$15.1M-$15.0M-$33.2M-$69.9M-$34.0M
EBITDA$295M$295M$241M$188M$189M
Net income-$57.8M-$57.7M-$42.7M-$142M-$34.5M
Free cash flow$125M$125M$36.2M$85.8M$96.4M
Capital expenditure$508M$508M$418M$262M$207M
Total debt$919M$919M$884M$702M$791M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Manchester United competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+20%+40%+60%BNJMSGE4816LION600977CNKBATRAITV002739BFTAMC30013330025196050326601595MSGR300182MANU6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Manchester United is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%0×100×200×BNJMSGE4816LION600977CNK002739BFT300133300251601595300182MANURevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Manchester United is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%BNJMSGE4816LION600977CNKITV002739BFT9605601595PFOCUSMANUGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Manchester United is the large dot.

Manchester United competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MANU vs JUVE.MI vs BVB.DE vs OLG.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Manchester United MANU$3.90B+15%+5%-2%142.1×18.3%
Juventus Football Club JUVE.MI$738M-22%-1%-28%n/an/a
Borussia Dortmund GmbH & Co. KGaA BVB.DE$384M+2%-12%-4%12.9×-11.4%
Olympique Lyonnais Groupe OLG.PA$306M-27%-12%-159%n/an/a

How Manchester United compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Manchester United against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMANUPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+11.3%+13.4%11th highest of 21
6-month return+14.8%+10.6%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-7.5%-15.7%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.5%+1.9%9th highest of 21
Operating margin-1.8%8.5%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E142.1×32.1×3rd most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)18.3%2.4%4th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.5%+15.4%3rd lowest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+11.8 pp-14.7 pp4th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-9.3 pp+0.4 pp6th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA16.0×10.2×3rd most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA2.8×3.2×6th least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Manchester United MANUUnited States$3.90B+15%+5%-2%142.1×18.3%+6.5%
Banijay BNJ.ASNetherlands$3.83B-13%+7%14%8.0×-4.5%+18.1%
Madison Square Garden Entertainment MSGEUnited States$3.65B+18%+16%17%32.1×5.0%+66.9%
Toei Animation 4816.TJapan$4.17B+23%-2%31%27.9×0.5%+12.7%
Lionsgate Studios LIONUnited States$4.24B+16%-8%6%52.8×18.6%-8.0%
China Film 600977.SSChina$4.48B+16%0%-9%141.5×-7.1%+10.4%
Cinemark CNKUnited States$4.51B+44%+13%15%14.8×2.4%+35.3%
Atlanta Braves BATRAUnited States$3.23B+1%+6%-9%n/an/an/a
Itv ITV.LUnited Kingdom$3.23B-16%+2%13%8.3×-2.8%+4.8%
Ruyi Film Entertainment 002739.SZChina$2.94B-9%-8%3%34.1×6.7%+15.4%
Benefit Systems BFT.WAPoland$5.18B+54%+40%19%23.7×13.4%+34.3%
AMC Entertainment AMCUnited States$2.80B+109%+6%5%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Huace Film & TV 300133.SZChina$2.79B+15%+44%8%50.4×n/an/a
Beijing Enlight Media 300251.SZChina$5.49B-16%-71%-57%179.5×n/an/a
Toei 9605.TJapan$2.77B+5%+3%20%23.5×-3.3%+11.5%
Genting Singapore G13.SISingapore$5.76B-10%+2%15%19.1×-5.0%+18.2%
China Star Entertainment 0326.HKHong Kong$2.54B-10%-69%-157%n/an/an/a
Shanghai Film 601595.SSChina$2.40B+47%-18%-2%264.9×57.0%+24.4%
MSG Rangers MSGRUnited States$2.37B+1,624%+2%-9%n/an/an/a
Beijing Jetsen Technology 300182.SZChina$2.36B+6%-23%9%37.1×n/an/a
Prime Focus PFOCUS.NSIndia$2.36B-7%+29%16%n/a26.0%+12.6%

Questions

Who are Manchester United's main competitors?
Named competitors: Juventus Football Club (JUVE.MI), Borussia Dortmund (BVB.DE), Other Premier League clubs (mostly private) (private or unlisted), Olympique Lyonnais Groupe (OLG.PA), AS Roma (private or unlisted), Celtic (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Banijay (BNJ.AS), Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSGE), Toei Animation (4816.T), Lionsgate Studios (LION), China Film (600977.SS), Cinemark (CNK).
Is Manchester United expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 142.1× against a peer median of 32.1×, 3rd most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Manchester United stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +14.8% against +10.6% for the median peer; over one year +44.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.