Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MLX.AX Metals X LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Metals X LimitedMLX.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals

Australian miner with an economic interest in the Renison tin mine (Tasmania) via a joint venture, plus other base-metal interests.

≈ A small-cap Australian tin minerMomentum laggard 16
Mkt cap
$934M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
90%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.92M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+38.9 pp
WACC 9.5%
Hurdle
-41 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
294 days
27 Aug 2027
Close · AUDA$1.52
1D-8.2%
1W-4.4%
1M-26.9%
3M-20.0%
6M-11.4%
YTD+36.3%
1Y+85.4%
ATR %6.8%
52w lowhigh30.3% off high

What Metals X does

Australian miner with an economic interest in the Renison tin mine (Tasmania) via a joint venture, plus other base-metal interests.

In one line: A small-cap Australian tin miner.

Products and services

  • Renison tin mine JV interest
  • Other exploration/base metals

Customers

  • Tin smelters/traders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Base metals mining
  • Tin mining (Renison JV)
  • Metals processing

What could go right

  • Tin price strength (electronics/solder demand)
  • Mine life extension

What could go wrong

  • Tin price volatility
  • Minority JV stake limits control

Moat: none. Minority JV interest in a single tin mine, exposed fully to tin price cycles.

Headquarters: Perth, Australia · Founded: 1971

Named competitors

Metals X at a glance

Size Metals X (MLX.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $934M, the 187th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$1.52 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.4%, against -17.1% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 26.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +48.6%); the operating margin is 53.3% (peer median 4.9%).

Valuation It trades at 7.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.1× (2nd cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +31%, so the hurdle is -41 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 38.9 points above its cost of capital (9.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 27 Aug 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MLX.AX 92Peer median 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Metals X against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Metals X financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueA$342MA$285MA$219MA$154MA$133M
Revenue growth—+30%+42%+15%—
Gross profitA$186MA$126MA$89.1MA$46.4MA$32.3M
EBITDAn/aA$148MA$115MA$58.7MA$40.6M
Net incomeA$156MA$105MA$102MA$14.6MA$19.9M
Free cash flowA$151MA$92.4MA$104MA$29.9M-A$7.28M
Capital expenditureA$39.0MA$37.3MA$40.9MA$34.9MA$18.8M
Total debtn/aA$3.29MA$6.15MA$8.36MA$3.34M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Metals X competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-25%0%+25%SANDUMAOMARG603595300700AMG2362TMCTLO002088USAJAINREC603399300697688456MLX.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Metals X is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×20×40×60×ARGAMG2362002088USAJAINRECDVPFOIL688456MLX.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Metals X is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%SANDUMAARGAMG2362002088ZIM2546MLX.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Metals X is the large dot.

Metals X competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MLX.AX vs 000960.SZ vs AFM.V)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Metals X MLX.AX$934M-11%+26%53%7.2×-10.3%
Yunnan Tin 000960.SZ$5.66B-34%+19%8%10.8×1.9%
Alphamin Resources AFM.V$1.12B-15%+45%54%4.1×n/a

How Metals X compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Metals X against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMLX.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-26.9%-15.9%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-11.4%-17.1%7th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-30.3%-44.5%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+26.1%+48.6%7th lowest of 17
Operating margin53.3%4.9%highest of 18
Forward P/E7.2×14.1×2nd cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-10.3%3.8%2nd least demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+31.2%+6.0%2nd highest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-41.5 pp-9.5 ppleast demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital+38.9 pp-2.6 pphighest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Metals X MLX.AXAustralia$934M-11%+26%53%7.2×-10.3%+31.2%
Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores SANDUMA.NSIndia$914M-18%+21%20%n/a13.8%+46.8%
Osisko Metals OM.TOCanada$911M-16%n/an/an/an/an/a
Amerigo Resources ARG.TOCanada$910M+24%+54%41%12.2×3.8%+13.4%
Zhejiang Tony Electronic 603595.SSChina$960M+52%+5%-12%n/an/an/a
Changsha Dialine New Material Sci.&Tech 300700.SZChina$903M-13%+14%-23%n/an/an/a
AMG Critical Materials AMG.ASNetherlands$988M-41%+12%7%11.9×0.2%+13.0%
Jinchuan Group International Resources 2362.HKHong Kong$997M+4%+65%22%2.0×-2.2%-1.8%
TMC TMCUnited States$1.00B-60%n/an/an/an/an/a
Talon Metals TLO.TOCanada$839M+3%n/a3%17.9×n/an/a
Luyang Energy-Saving Materials 002088.SZChina$837M+12%-21%1%58.4×20.8%+1.3%
Americas Gold and Silver USA.TOCanada$1.05B-50%+86%19%14.9×n/an/a
Jain Resource Recycling JAINREC.NSIndia$1.05B-43%+48%5%23.4×n/an/a
IMC Rare Earths IMCUnited States$824Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Zimplats ZIM.AXAustralia$1.06B-15%+50%33%n/a-15.0%+1.1%
Jinzhou Yongshan Lithium 603399.SSChina$821M-45%+50%2%n/an/an/a
Xizang Zhihui Mining 2546.HKHong Kong$1.08B+8%+104%28%n/a32.8%+6.0%
Develop Global DVP.AXAustralia$801M-43%+68%4%11.8×n/an/a
Jiangyin Electrical Alloy 300697.SZChina$791M-24%+54%5%n/an/an/a
Londian Wason New Energy Tech, Inc. Unsponsored ADR FOILUnited States$1.11Bn/a+25%5%13.3×n/an/a
GRIPM Advanced Materials 688456.SSChina$780M-24%+34%2%49.6×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Metals X's main competitors?
Named competitors: Yunnan Tin (000960.SZ), Alphamin Resources (AFM.V), PT Timah (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores (SANDUMA.NS), Osisko Metals (OM.TO), Amerigo Resources (ARG.TO), Zhejiang Tony Electronic (603595.SS), Changsha Dialine New Material Sci.&Tech (300700.SZ), AMG Critical Materials (AMG.AS).
Is Metals X expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.2× against a peer median of 14.1×, 2nd cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -10% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +31%, so the hurdle is -41 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Metals X stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.4% against -17.1% for the median peer; over one year +85.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.