SizeMidwest (MIDWESTLTD.NS) is an India Industrials company (Construction Materials) with a market value of $383M, the 959th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹981.70 on 6 Nov 2026.
Performance Over six months the shares fell 28.8%, against -20.2% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 9 in its peer set.
Growth Revenue grew 3.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.2%); the operating margin is 21.4% (peer median 8.6%).
Valuation It trades at 23.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.4× (4th most expensive of 9).
Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 40% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +31 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.6 points below its cost of capital (20.0% WACC).
Next results Next results expected around 2 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).
Relative performance
Six months, rebased to 100: Midwest against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).
Midwest financials
Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.
Performance: 6-month against 1-month return
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Midwest is the large dot.
Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Midwest is the large dot.
Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Midwest is the large dot.
Midwest competitors and peer comparison
How Midwest compares with its peers
Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.
Midwest against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure
MIDWESTLTD.NS
Peer median
Rank in peer set
1-month return
-8.0%
+1.0%
2nd lowest of 9
6-month return
-28.8%
-20.2%
3rd lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high
-47.2%
-34.8%
2nd lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)
+3.1%
+5.2%
2nd lowest of 9
Operating margin
21.4%
8.6%
2nd highest of 9
Forward P/E
23.4×
21.4×
4th most expensive of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)
39.8%
16.2%
most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)
+8.7%
+8.3%
4th highest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)
+31.1 pp
+8.0 pp
most demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital
-8.6 pp
-4.3 pp
2nd lowest of 9
EV / EBITDA
19.9×
9.2×
4th most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA
-0.2×
1.6×
2nd least indebted of 9
Peer table
Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
The cockpit's peer set: Monolithisch India (MONOLITH.NS), Prism Johnson (PRSMJOHNSN.NS), JK Lakshmi Cement (JKLAKSHMI.NS), Birla (BIRLACORPN.NS), Star Cement (STARCEMENT.NS), Vesuvius India (VESUVIUS.NS), India Cements (INDIACEM.NS), Nuvoco Vistas (NUVOCO.NS).
Is Midwest expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.4× against a peer median of 21.4×, 4th most expensive of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 40% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +31 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Midwest stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -28.8% against -20.2% for the median peer; over one year -14.0%.