Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MIDWESTLTD.NS Midwest LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Midwest LimitedMIDWESTLTD.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Construction & Infra›Construction Materials
Momentum laggard 11
Mkt cap
$383M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
15%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$449,392
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-8.6 pp
WACC 20.0%
Hurdle
+31 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
26 days
2 Dec 2026
Close · INR₹981.70
1D-3.5%
1W-7.7%
1M-8.0%
3M-18.4%
6M-28.8%
YTD-42.9%
1Y-14.0%
ATR %5.9%
Beta1.20
52w lowhigh47.2% off high

What Midwest does

Employees: 373

Midwest at a glance

Size Midwest (MIDWESTLTD.NS) is an India Industrials company (Construction Materials) with a market value of $383M, the 959th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹981.70 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 28.8%, against -20.2% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 9 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.2%); the operating margin is 21.4% (peer median 8.6%).

Valuation It trades at 23.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.4× (4th most expensive of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 40% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +31 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 8.6 points below its cost of capital (20.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Dec 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 80MIDWESTLTD.NS 71
Six months, rebased to 100: Midwest against the median of its 8 peers (local-currency closes).

Midwest financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹6.95B₹6.46B₹6.26B₹5.86B₹5.03B
Revenue growth—+3%+7%+17%—
Gross profit₹3.25B₹2.40B₹2.33B₹2.06B₹1.40B
EBITDA₹1.82B₹1.79B₹1.80B₹1.59B₹942M
Net income₹1.11B₹1.05B₹1.22B₹965M₹541M
Free cash flown/a₹392M-₹1.07B₹579M-₹1.03B
Capital expendituren/a₹1.30B₹1.90B₹651M₹445M
Total debtn/a₹1.92B₹2.42B₹1.24B₹1.51B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Midwest competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%-10%0%+10%MONOLITHPRSMJOHNSNJKLAKSHMIBIRLACORPNVESUVIUSINDIACEMNUVOCOMIDWESTLTD.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Midwest is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%20×40×60×80×MONOLITHPRSMJOHNSNJKLAKSHMIBIRLACORPNSTARCEMENTVESUVIUSINDIACEMNUVOCOMIDWESTLTD.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Midwest is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

+10%+20%+30%+40%20%40%PRSMJOHNSNJKLAKSHMIBIRLACORPNSTARCEMENTVESUVIUSNUVOCOMIDWESTLTD.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Midwest is the large dot.

Midwest competitors and peer comparison

How Midwest compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Midwest against its 8 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMIDWESTLTD.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.0%+1.0%2nd lowest of 9
6-month return-28.8%-20.2%3rd lowest of 9
Distance from 52-week high-47.2%-34.8%2nd lowest of 9
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.1%+5.2%2nd lowest of 9
Operating margin21.4%8.6%2nd highest of 9
Forward P/E23.4×21.4×4th most expensive of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)39.8%16.2%most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.7%+8.3%4th highest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+31.1 pp+8.0 ppmost demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital-8.6 pp-4.3 pp2nd lowest of 9
EV / EBITDA19.9×9.2×4th most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-0.2×1.6×2nd least indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Midwest MIDWESTLTD.NSIndia$383M-29%+3%21%23.4×39.8%+8.7%
Monolithisch India MONOLITH.NSIndia$307M+136%+39%26%48.2×n/an/a
Prism Johnson PRSMJOHNSN.NSIndia$538M-24%+1%3%79.9×22.6%+5.7%
JK Lakshmi Cement JKLAKSHMI.NSIndia$598M-32%+5%8%13.2×14.5%+7.4%
Birla BIRLACORPN.NSIndia$673M-16%+4%9%13.8×5.7%+7.6%
Star Cement STARCEMENT.NSIndia$739M-28%+15%14%19.2×4.9%+16.8%
Vesuvius India VESUVIUS.NSIndia$782M-31%+4%13%22.1×30.4%+21.6%
India Cements INDIACEM.NSIndia$1.14B-15%+5%5%25.6×n/an/a
Nuvoco Vistas NUVOCO.NSIndia$1.29B+2%+11%8%20.8×17.8%+8.9%

Questions

Which companies are Midwest's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Monolithisch India (MONOLITH.NS), Prism Johnson (PRSMJOHNSN.NS), JK Lakshmi Cement (JKLAKSHMI.NS), Birla (BIRLACORPN.NS), Star Cement (STARCEMENT.NS), Vesuvius India (VESUVIUS.NS), India Cements (INDIACEM.NS), Nuvoco Vistas (NUVOCO.NS).
Is Midwest expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.4× against a peer median of 21.4×, 4th most expensive of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 40% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +9%, so the hurdle is +31 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Midwest stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -28.8% against -20.2% for the median peer; over one year -14.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.