Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MELI MercadoLibre, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

MercadoLibre, Inc.MELICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Discretionary›Internet Retail

Latin America's largest e-commerce marketplace, with an integrated digital payments and logistics platform.

≈ Latin America's Amazon plus PayPal combinedMomentum weak 27
Mkt cap
$76.6B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
93%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.15B
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
32.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+18.6 pp
WACC 10.7%
Hurdle
-37 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$1,510
1D-1.3%
1W-7.0%
1M-18.7%
3M-17.2%
6M-7.5%
YTD-25.0%
1Y-34.4%
ATR %5.1%
Beta1.29
52w lowhigh35.5% off high

What MercadoLibre does

Latin America's largest e-commerce marketplace, with an integrated digital payments and logistics platform.

Earns commissions and shipping fees from sellers on its marketplace and advertising income, while the fintech side earns payment-processing fees and interest on loans to consumers and merchants. Brazil is the largest market, followed by Argentina and Mexico. The fintech arm has grown into a second engine alongside the marketplace.

In one line: Latin America's Amazon plus PayPal combined.

Products and services

  • Marketplace (e-commerce)
  • Mercado Pago (fintech/payments)
  • Mercado Envios (logistics)
  • Mercado Credito (lending)

Customers

  • Latin American consumers
  • SME merchants/sellers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • E-commerce/fintech
  • Online marketplace
  • Digital payments & logistics

What could go right

  • E-commerce and fintech penetration growth in Latin America
  • Advertising monetization

What could go wrong

  • Latin American currency/macro volatility
  • Rising logistics/fulfillment costs

Moat: narrow (network effects, scale, distribution). First-mover logistics and payments network across Latin America is costly for rivals to replicate.

Headquarters: Montevideo, Uruguay · Founded: 1999 · Employees: 123,670

Named competitors

MercadoLibre at a glance

Size MercadoLibre (MELI) is a United States Consumer Discretionary company (Internet Retail) with a market value of $76.6B, the 178th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $1,510 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.5%, against -4.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 6 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 46.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.1%); the operating margin is 8.3% (peer median 4.1%).

Valuation It trades at 32.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.0× (2nd most expensive of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +49%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 18.6 points above its cost of capital (10.7% WACC).

Credit MercadoLibre has 3 bonds outstanding ($2.29B), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 145 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MELI 97Peer median 96
Six months, rebased to 100: MercadoLibre against the median of its 5 peers (local-currency closes).

MercadoLibre financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$35.2B$28.9B$20.8B$15.1B$10.5B
Revenue growth—+39%+38%+43%—
Gross profit$15.0B$12.6B$9.28B$7.33B$4.96B
EBITDA$3.89B$3.77B$3.10B$2.62B$1.36B
Net income$1.86B$2.00B$1.91B$987M$482M
Free cash flow$8.93B$9.18B$5.84B$3.94B$2.49B
Capital expenditure$1.34B$1.34B$860M$509M$455M
Total debt$18.4B$15.2B$8.81B$6.42B$5.90B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

MercadoLibre competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%+10%-20%-10%0%+10%EBAYSE9618CPNG9988MELI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. MercadoLibre is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+10%+20%+30%+40%20×40×EBAYSE9618CPNG9988MELIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. MercadoLibre is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

+20%+40%20%40%EBAYSE9618MELIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. MercadoLibre is the large dot.

MercadoLibre competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MELI vs AMZN vs SE vs CPNG)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
MercadoLibre MELI$76.6B-8%+46%8%32.0×11.9%
Amazon AMZN$2.80T-5%+15%13%26.3×n/a
Sea Limited Sponsored ADR SE$49.1B-13%+43%8%18.0×11.7%
Coupang CPNG$29.2B-4%+7%-3%55.9×n/a

How MercadoLibre compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

MercadoLibre against its 5 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMELIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-18.7%+5.7%lowest of 6
6-month return-7.5%-4.8%3rd lowest of 6
Distance from 52-week high-35.5%-39.9%3rd highest of 6
Revenue growth (TTM)+46.0%+8.1%highest of 6
Operating margin8.3%4.1%2nd highest of 6
Forward P/E32.0×18.0×2nd most expensive of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)11.9%14.4%2nd least demanding of 4
Growth delivered (Del g)+48.7%+11.1%highest of 4
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-36.8 pp+3.3 ppleast demanding of 4
ROIC minus cost of capital+18.6 pp-8.9 pphighest of 6
EV / EBITDA19.7×19.1×2nd most expensive of 4
Net debt / EBITDA-0.1×-2.4×2nd most indebted of 5
Bond spread145 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
MercadoLibre MELIUnited States$76.6B-8%+46%8%32.0×11.9%+48.7%
eBay EBAYUnited States$53.5B+14%+15%21%18.4×15.4%+4.6%
Sea Limited Sponsored ADR SEUnited States$49.1B-13%+43%8%18.0×11.7%+39.3%
Jd-sw 9618.HKHong Kong$34.8B-5%+8%0%9.2×14.4%+11.1%
Coupang CPNGUnited States$29.2B-4%+7%-3%55.9×n/an/a
Baba-w 9988.HKHong Kong$266B-25%+8%4%16.4×n/an/a

MercadoLibre bonds and credit

MercadoLibre has 3 bonds outstanding with $2.29B face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 6.20%, a spread of 145 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are MercadoLibre's main competitors?
Named competitors: Amazon (AMZN), Sea Limited (Shopee) (SE), Magazine Luiza (private or unlisted), Coupang (CPNG). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes eBay (EBAY), Sea Limited Sponsored ADR (SE), Jd-sw (9618.HK), Coupang (CPNG), Baba-w (9988.HK).
Is MercadoLibre expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 32.0× against a peer median of 18.0×, 2nd most expensive of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +49%, so the hurdle is -37 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has MercadoLibre stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.5% against -4.8% for the median peer; over one year -34.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.