Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MDLZ Mondelez InternationalOpen in the cockpit ↗

Mondelez InternationalMDLZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Staples›Food: Specialty/Candy

Global snacks company behind Oreo, Cadbury chocolate, Ritz crackers and Trident gum.

Momentum strong 74
Mkt cap
$83.6B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$533M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.8 pp
WACC 6.4%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB / A
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
83 days
28 Jan 2027
Close · USD$66.02
1D-1.2%
1W+1.7%
1M+8.8%
3M+7.3%
6M+8.2%
YTD+24.7%
1Y+21.0%
ATR %2.4%
Beta-0.23
52w lowhigh4.0% off high

What Mondelez International does

Global snacks company behind Oreo, Cadbury chocolate, Ritz crackers and Trident gum.

Sells branded snacks to grocers and wholesalers worldwide, with most sales outside North America and a large share from emerging markets. It was created in 2012 when Kraft Foods split in two, taking the snacking side, and had widened its range earlier through the 2010 Cadbury purchase.

Products and services

  • Biscuits (Oreo, Ritz)
  • Chocolate (Cadbury, Milka)
  • Gum & candy

Customers

  • Grocery retailers worldwide
  • Convenience stores

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Packaged food & beverage
  • Global snack manufacturing
  • Retail distribution worldwide

What could go right

  • Emerging-market snack consumption growth
  • Pricing power on iconic brands

What could go wrong

  • Cocoa price volatility
  • GLP-1 impact on snack consumption

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, distribution). Globally recognized snack brands with strong emerging-market distribution reach.

Headquarters: Chicago, Illinois, US · Founded: 2012 · Employees: 91,000

Named competitors

Mondelez International at a glance

Size Mondelez International (MDLZ) is a United States Consumer Staples company (Food: Specialty/Candy) with a market value of $83.6B, the 163rd largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $66.02 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 8.2%, against -7.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — highest of 6 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.4%); the operating margin is 18.3% (peer median 16.5%).

Valuation It trades at 19.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 28.2× (3rd cheapest of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.8 points above its cost of capital (6.4% WACC).

Credit Mondelez International has 30 bonds outstanding ($16.4B), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like A at a weighted spread of 77 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MDLZ 108Peer median 93
Six months, rebased to 100: Mondelez International against the median of its 5 peers (local-currency closes).

Mondelez International financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$39.9B$38.5B$36.4B$36.0B$31.5B
Revenue growth—+6%+1%+14%—
Gross profit$15.2B$12.0B$12.2B$13.3B$10.9B
EBITDA$8.70B$6.24B$6.63B$6.88B$4.92B
Net income$4.08B$2.45B$4.61B$4.96B$2.72B
Free cash flow$3.66B$3.23B$3.52B$3.60B$3.00B
Capital expenditure$1.34B$1.28B$1.39B$1.11B$906M
Total debt$22.3B$22.0B$18.5B$20.1B$23.6B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Mondelez International competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-10%0%+10%-20%-10%0%+10%PEPHSY6032882802LISNMDLZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Mondelez International is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+4%+5%+6%20×25×30×PEPHSY6032882802LISNMDLZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Mondelez International is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%PEPHSY6032882802LISNMDLZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Mondelez International is the large dot.

Mondelez International competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MDLZ vs NESN.SW vs HSY vs PEP)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Mondelez International MDLZ$83.6B+8%+6%18%19.9×-2.7%
Nestle NESN.SW$266B+11%-2%16%19.0×1.3%
Hershey Company (The) HSY$35.8B-3%+7%20%19.2×-5.0%
PepsiCo PEP$193B-8%+6%16%16.6×-5.5%

How Mondelez International compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Mondelez International against its 5 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMDLZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+8.8%+9.6%3rd lowest of 6
6-month return+8.2%-7.6%highest of 6
Distance from 52-week high-4.0%-25.1%highest of 6
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.0%+6.4%3rd lowest of 6
Operating margin18.3%16.5%3rd highest of 6
Forward P/E19.9×28.2×3rd cheapest of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-2.7%3.4%3rd least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.7%+7.5%3rd highest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-10.4 pp-4.7 pp3rd least demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.8 pp+13.1 pp2nd lowest of 6
EV / EBITDA12.0×14.7×2nd cheapest of 5
Net debt / EBITDA2.4×1.4×most indebted of 5
Bond spread77 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Mondelez International MDLZUnited States$83.6B+8%+6%18%19.9×-2.7%+7.7%
PepsiCo PEPUnited States$193B-8%+6%16%16.6×-5.5%+5.9%
Hershey Company (The) HSYUnited States$35.8B-3%+7%20%19.2×-5.0%+7.5%
Foshan Haitian Flavouring and Food 603288.SSChina$29.8B-7%+6%27%28.9×7.6%+4.9%
Ajinomoto 2802.TJapan$25.3B-16%+7%11%29.4×19.2%+8.1%
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli LISN.SWSwitzerland$24.6B-8%+4%16%28.2×3.4%+8.1%

Mondelez International bonds and credit

Mondelez International has 30 bonds outstanding with $16.4B face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like A. Weighted yield 4.74%, a spread of 77 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Mondelez International's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nestle (NESN.SW), Hershey (HSY), PepsiCo (PEP), Mars (private) (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes PepsiCo (PEP), Hershey Company (The) (HSY), Foshan Haitian Flavouring and Food (603288.SS), Ajinomoto (2802.T), Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli (LISN.SW).
Is Mondelez International expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.9× against a peer median of 28.2×, 3rd cheapest of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Mondelez International stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +8.2% against -7.6% for the median peer; over one year +21.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.