Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MANORAMA.NS Manorama Industries Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Manorama Industries Ltd.MANORAMA.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·FMCG›Food: Specialty/Candy

Indian manufacturer of specialty fats (cocoa butter alternatives) and butters used in chocolate, cosmetics and food industries.

Momentum leader 87
Mkt cap
$1.31B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
31%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.53M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
39.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+24.4 pp
WACC 14.7%
Hurdle
-14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · INR₹1,958
1D+2.8%
1W+9.0%
1M-1.9%
3M+20.6%
6M+21.8%
YTD+46.6%
1Y+39.9%
ATR %3.9%
Beta1.29
52w lowhigh8.9% off high

What Manorama Industries does

Indian manufacturer of specialty fats (cocoa butter alternatives) and butters used in chocolate, cosmetics and food industries.

Products and services

  • Cocoa butter equivalents/alternatives
  • Specialty butters (shea, mango, sal)
  • Cosmetic-grade fats

Customers

  • Chocolate/confectionery manufacturers
  • Cosmetics companies
  • Food processors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Specialty chemicals/ingredients
  • Specialty fats & butters
  • B2B ingredient manufacturing

What could go right

  • Rising global chocolate/cosmetics ingredient demand
  • Import substitution in specialty fats

What could go wrong

  • Raw material (sal/shea seed) sourcing risk
  • Customer concentration

Moat: narrow (process know-how). Specialized fat-fractionation process expertise serving niche confectionery/cosmetics ingredient demand.

Headquarters: Raipur, India · Founded: 2004 · Employees: 523

Named competitors

Manorama Industries at a glance

Size Manorama Industries (MANORAMA.NS) is an India Consumer Staples company (Food: Specialty/Candy) with a market value of $1.31B, the 517th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹1,958 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 21.8%, against -19.9% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 59.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.3%); the operating margin is 24.1% (peer median 5.7%).

Valuation It trades at 39.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.1× (3rd most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 33% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +47%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 24.4 points above its cost of capital (14.7% WACC).

Relative performance

8010012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MANORAMA.NS 124Peer median 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Manorama Industries against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Manorama Industries financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹14.8B₹13.6B₹7.68B₹4.56B₹3.50B
Revenue growth—+77%+68%+30%—
Gross profit₹5.64B₹4.39B₹2.43B₹1.20B₹811M
EBITDA₹3.83B₹3.59B₹1.85B₹735M₹566M
Net income₹2.47B₹2.25B₹1.10B₹401M₹298M
Free cash flown/a₹1.66B-₹1.20B-₹2.06B₹28.1M
Capital expendituren/a₹548M₹318M₹390M₹513M
Total debtn/a₹3.56B₹4.82B₹3.46B₹1.10B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Manorama Industries competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%-20%-10%0%+10%054622010336CCL6050160028912602ITMFLO60092960302720012811002216600127MANORAMA.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Manorama Industries is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%20×40×60×054622010336BIKAJICCL6050160028912602ITMFLO6009296030270049902811600866MANORAMA.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Manorama Industries is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%22010336BIKAJICCL6050162602FLO603027002216MANORAMA.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Manorama Industries is the large dot.

Manorama Industries competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (MANORAMA.NS vs AAK.ST vs 2607.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Manorama Industries MANORAMA.NS$1.31B+22%+60%24%39.3×33.4%
Aak AAK.ST$4.88B-30%-1%10%13.6×-6.0%
Fuji Oil 2607.T$2.46B+36%+10%5%15.2×0.9%

How Manorama Industries compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Manorama Industries against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMANORAMA.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.9%-0.2%9th lowest of 21
6-month return+21.8%-19.9%2nd highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-8.9%-32.6%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+59.8%+5.3%highest of 21
Operating margin24.1%5.7%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E39.3×21.1×3rd most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)33.4%3.1%2nd most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+46.9%+9.4%highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-13.5 pp-7.6 pp2nd least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+24.4 pp-0.4 pphighest of 21
EV / EBITDA32.2×9.7×most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×0.7×7th least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Manorama Industries MANORAMA.NSIndia$1.31B+22%+60%24%39.3×33.4%+46.9%
Fufeng 0546.HKHong Kong$1.31B-37%+1%4%7.4×n/an/a
Morinaga & 2201.TJapan$1.28B-8%+3%9%12.3×-5.7%+7.1%
Huabao International 0336.HKHong Kong$1.34B-25%+13%3%25.3×16.2%-2.7%
Bikaji Foods International BIKAJI.NSIndia$1.27B-29%+14%10%37.4×38.6%+17.5%
CCL Products (India) CCL.NSIndia$1.37B-20%+24%13%25.8×17.9%+29.1%
Shandong Bailong Chuangyuan Bio-Tech 605016.SSChina$1.24B-28%+19%32%18.4×8.8%+22.5%
Yantai China Pet Foods 002891.SZChina$1.39B-15%+21%4%32.6×n/an/a
Nisshin OilliO 2602.TJapan$1.22B+13%+8%3%18.0×3.1%+10.5%
Italmobiliare ITM.MIItaly$1.20B-8%+8%14%12.0×n/an/a
Flowers Foods FLOUnited States$1.42B-20%+2%6%8.8×-7.6%+3.7%
Snowsky Salt Industry 600929.SSChina$1.20B-29%+32%1%54.7×n/an/a
Qianhe Condiment & Food 603027.SSChina$1.43B-21%-6%14%23.9×3.1%+8.8%
Lotte 004990.KSSouth Korea$1.18B-27%+1%2%69.5×n/an/a
Chacha Food 002557.SZChina$1.46B-17%+8%8%15.8×n/an/a
NIPPN 2001.TJapan$1.50B+8%+2%5%11.3×n/an/a
Kagome 2811.TJapan$1.51B+3%+3%7%24.0×2.2%+10.0%
Jiangxi Qiyunshan Food 2797.HKHong Kong$1.10Bn/a-7%17%n/an/an/a
Sanquan Foods 002216.SZChina$1.56B-18%+7%5%18.1×2.6%-1.1%
JinJian Cereals Industry 600127.SSChina$1.08B+64%+1%-1%n/an/an/a
Star Lake Bioscience 600866.SSChina$1.07B-26%-3%0%37.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Manorama Industries's main competitors?
Named competitors: AAK AB (AAK.ST), Fuji Oil Holdings (2607.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Fufeng (0546.HK), Morinaga & (2201.T), Huabao International (0336.HK), Bikaji Foods International (BIKAJI.NS), CCL Products (India) (CCL.NS), Shandong Bailong Chuangyuan Bio-Tech (605016.SS).
Is Manorama Industries expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 39.3× against a peer median of 21.1×, 3rd most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 33% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +47%, so the hurdle is -14 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Manorama Industries stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +21.8% against -19.9% for the median peer; over one year +39.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.