Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LNR.TO Linamar CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Linamar CorporationLNR.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM

Canadian manufacturer of precision auto parts/powertrain components and industrial/agricultural equipment (including Skyjack access equipment).

≈ A diversified auto-parts and industrial equipment manufacturer like a smaller Dana IncorpoMomentum weak 25
Mkt cap
$3.63B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$12.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+1.4 pp
WACC 8.3%
Hurdle
-20 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
124 days
10 Mar 2027
Close · CADC$86.29
1D-1.5%
1W-2.5%
1M-10.8%
3M-18.3%
6M-9.5%
YTD+4.0%
1Y+15.3%
ATR %3.2%
52w lowhigh22.0% off high

What Linamar does

Canadian manufacturer of precision auto parts/powertrain components and industrial/agricultural equipment (including Skyjack access equipment).

Splits income between making components to automakers' designs under long-term supply programs and making finished machines under its own brands: Skyjack lifts and MacDon harvesting equipment. Each customer program is awarded years before production starts and runs for a model's life. The Hasenfratz family is the largest shareholder.

In one line: A diversified auto-parts and industrial equipment manufacturer like a smaller Dana Incorpo.

Products and services

  • Powertrain/driveline components
  • Skyjack aerial work platforms
  • Agricultural equipment components

Customers

  • Global automakers (GM, Ford, Stellantis)
  • Equipment rental companies (Skyjack)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Auto parts/industrial manufacturing
  • Precision machining/powertrain…
  • Access equipment (Skyjack)

What could go right

  • Global vehicle production growth
  • Construction/rental equipment demand

What could go wrong

  • Auto production cyclicality
  • EV transition disrupting traditional powertrain parts

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, process know-how, scale). Long-term OEM supplier qualifications and precision manufacturing scale create switching costs for automakers.

Headquarters: Guelph, Canada · Founded: 1966 · Employees: 36,768

Named competitors

Linamar at a glance

Size Linamar (LNR.TO) is a Canada Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $3.63B, the 144th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$86.29 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.5%, against -13.1% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.3%); the operating margin is 8.9% (peer median 7.2%).

Valuation It trades at 7.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.3× (2nd cheapest of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -20 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.4 points above its cost of capital (8.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LNR.TO 90Peer median 88
Six months, rebased to 100: Linamar against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Linamar financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$11.1BC$10.2BC$10.6BC$9.73BC$7.92B
Revenue growth—-3%+9%+23%—
Gross profitC$1.62BC$1.51BC$1.50BC$1.32BC$972M
EBITDAC$1.64BC$1.39BC$1.35BC$1.14BC$1.00B
Net incomeC$684MC$585MC$258MC$503MC$426M
Free cash flowC$1.04BC$838MC$594M-C$17.3MC$37.1M
Capital expenditureC$371MC$422MC$564MC$790MC$423M
Total debtC$2.15BC$2.10BC$2.29BC$1.77BC$1.31B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Linamar competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%AMV0603596GTX00212605647282CIE6473CAR300432000981000887EXIDEINDATMU5991GNTX7276FR600699601799LNR.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Linamar is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%10×20×603596GTX00212605647282CIE6473CAR300432000887EXIDEINDFR600699LNR.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Linamar is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%603596GTX00212605647282CIE6473CAR000887EXIDEINDATMU5991GNTX600699601799LNR.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Linamar is the large dot.

Linamar competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LNR.TO vs MG.TO vs DAN vs OSK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Linamar LNR.TO$3.63B-9%+9%9%7.1×-8.4%
Magna International MG.TO$16.1B+4%0%6%8.2×0.1%
Dana DAN$2.17B-38%-9%4%6.1×8.8%
Oshkosh OSK$8.19B-3%+4%7%11.2×4.7%

How Linamar compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Linamar against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLNR.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.8%-5.3%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-9.5%-13.1%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-22.0%-31.8%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.3%+7.3%8th highest of 21
Operating margin8.9%7.2%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E7.1×13.3×2nd cheapest of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-8.4%0.9%least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.0%+8.5%5th highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-20.3 pp-8.8 pp2nd least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+1.4 pp+1.4 pp11th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA3.6×5.6×2nd cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA0.5×0.4×6th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Linamar LNR.TOCanada$3.63B-9%+9%9%7.1×-8.4%+12.0%
Aumovio AMV0.DEGermany$3.57B-12%-6%-6%n/a10.2%n/a
Bethel Automotive Safety Systems 603596.SSChina$3.70B-11%+21%10%16.0×7.0%+31.7%
Garrett Motion GTXUnited States$3.72B-31%+7%15%9.9×-6.9%+3.4%
Zhejiang Yinlun Machinery 002126.SZChina$3.53B-39%+28%7%23.0×14.6%+19.9%
ZCZL Industrial Technology 0564.HKHong Kong$3.80B-29%+9%9%4.4×-5.3%+8.5%
Toyoda Gosei 7282.TJapan$3.81B+26%+13%7%9.8×0.5%+9.7%
CIE Automotive CIE.MCSpain$3.46B-11%+4%14%8.5×-6.7%+6.5%
Jtekt 6473.TJapan$3.82B-1%+4%5%11.4×1.2%+9.1%
Inter Cars CAR.WAPoland$3.83B+38%+12%6%13.9×9.5%+18.3%
Fulin Precision 300432.SZChina$3.84B-47%+95%5%20.2×n/an/a
Sensteed Hi-Tech 000981.SZChina$3.36B-42%-15%-39%n/an/an/a
Anhui Zhongding Sealing Parts 000887.SZChina$3.32B-3%+9%8%15.1×3.8%+11.4%
Exide Industries EXIDEIND.NSIndia$3.20B-2%+13%8%21.7×27.5%+11.7%
Atmus Filtration Technologies ATMUUnited States$4.13B-9%+13%17%16.2×8.1%+7.4%
NHK Spring 5991.TJapan$3.18B-14%+3%6%9.8×5.2%+7.4%
Gentex GNTXUnited States$4.19B-15%+8%19%9.9×-4.7%+8.5%
Koito Manufacturing 7276.TJapan$4.27B-6%+6%6%13.3×-0.8%+6.1%
Valeo FR.PAFrance$3.00B-15%-2%4%7.3×-8.2%+4.9%
Ningbo Joyson Electronic 600699.SSChina$4.44B-27%-6%5%21.9×-1.1%+5.0%
Changzhou Xingyu Automotive Lighting Systems 601799.SSChina$2.92B-45%+2%9%13.4×-0.6%+15.8%

Questions

Who are Linamar's main competitors?
Named competitors: Magna International (MG.TO), Dana Incorporated (DAN), Oshkosh Corporation (OSK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aumovio (AMV0.DE), Bethel Automotive Safety Systems (603596.SS), Garrett Motion (GTX), Zhejiang Yinlun Machinery (002126.SZ), ZCZL Industrial Technology (0564.HK), Toyoda Gosei (7282.T).
Is Linamar expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.1× against a peer median of 13.3×, 2nd cheapest of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -20 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Linamar stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.5% against -13.1% for the median peer; over one year +15.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.