Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LNN Lindsay CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Lindsay CorporationLNNCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery

Makes center-pivot and lateral-move irrigation systems (Zimmatic) for farms, plus Road Zipper movable traffic-barrier systems.

Momentum neutral 41
Mkt cap
$1.08B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$19.2M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
20.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.5 pp
WACC 8.2%
Hurdle
+4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
62 days
7 Jan 2027
Close · USD$106.33
1D-0.5%
1W-1.2%
1M-7.2%
3M-7.7%
6M-2.8%
YTD-9.8%
1Y-7.6%
ATR %3.4%
Beta0.45
52w lowhigh28.2% off high

What Lindsay does

Makes center-pivot and lateral-move irrigation systems (Zimmatic) for farms, plus Road Zipper movable traffic-barrier systems.

Sells irrigation machines through independent dealers, so orders follow farm incomes and crop prices; replacement parts and control technology follow the installed fleet of machines. The infrastructure line sells moving-barrier and crash-protection products to highway agencies and contractors, which depend on road budgets.

Products and services

  • Zimmatic center-pivot irrigation
  • Lateral-move irrigation systems
  • Road Zipper moveable barrier systems
  • Irrigation controls/software

Customers

  • Row-crop farmers
  • Ag equipment dealers
  • Departments of transportation

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Agricultural & infrastructure equipment
  • Mechanized irrigation systems
  • Road Zipper barrier systems…

What could go right

  • Farm income-driven irrigation capex
  • Road-safety infrastructure spending

What could go wrong

  • Farm income/commodity price cyclicality
  • Ag equipment financing rates

Moat: narrow (brand, installed base, distribution). Strong dealer network and irrigation brand, but Valmont's Valley brand is an equally scaled rival.

Headquarters: Omaha, Nebraska · Founded: 1955 · Employees: 1,083

Named competitors

  • Valmont Industries VMI
  • T-L Irrigation private or unlisted
  • Reinke Manufacturing private or unlisted

Lindsay at a glance

Size Lindsay (LNN) is a United States Industrials company (Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) with a market value of $1.08B, the 2197th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $106.33 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.8%, against -20.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 6.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.0%); the operating margin is 10.5% (peer median 7.7%).

Valuation It trades at 20.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.8× (4th most expensive of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.5 points above its cost of capital (8.2% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 8.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 7 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LNN 98Peer median 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Lindsay against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Lindsay financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2026-08-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue$636M$636M$676M$607M$674M
Revenue growth—-6%+11%-10%—
Gross profit$184M$184M$211M$191M$213M
EBITDA$90.0M$90.0M$109M$94.3M$118M
Net income$55.7M$55.7M$74.1M$66.3M$72.4M
Free cash flow$34.7M$34.7M$90.4M$66.8M$101M
Capital expenditure$40.2M$40.2M$42.5M$29.0M$18.8M
Total debt$137M$137M$137M$134M$136M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lindsay competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%+10%VOS0026676001696250NWG6395300486002651300440002097300159TITAGARH601890439260ASB603680GBXJWLALIG071970LNN6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lindsay is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%10×20×30×VOS6250NWG6395TITAGARH601890439260ASBGBXJWLALIG071970LNNRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lindsay is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%VOS6001696250NWG300486002651300440TITAGARH601890603680ALIG071970LNNGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Lindsay is the large dot.

Lindsay competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LNN vs VMI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Lindsay LNN$1.08B-3%-6%11%20.4×6.0%
Valmont Industries VMI$7.74B-21%+5%14%15.9×10.7%

How Lindsay compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lindsay against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLNNPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.2%-4.0%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-2.8%-20.2%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-28.2%-40.1%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-6.0%+10.0%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.5%7.7%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E20.4×14.8×4th most expensive of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)6.0%9.6%6th least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.3%+8.9%4th lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.7 pp-3.7 pp6th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.5 pp-3.8 pp6th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA11.4×11.7×5th cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-0.6×1.2×2nd least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lindsay LNNUnited States$1.08B-3%-6%11%20.4×6.0%+2.3%
Vossloh Aktiengesellschaft VOS.DEGermany$1.08B-31%+21%5%21.7×12.9%+9.1%
Willing New Energy 002667.SZChina$1.08B-20%+49%-44%n/an/an/a
Taiyuan Heavy Industry 600169.SSChina$1.10B-8%+10%6%n/a-3.8%+3.7%
Yamabiko 6250.TJapan$1.11B+8%+10%13%9.9×-2.2%+5.7%
Newag NWG.WAPoland$1.04B-16%+45%21%11.9×-4.3%+12.6%
TADANO 6395.TJapan$1.02B-8%+21%9%10.8×n/an/a
OMH SCIENCE 300486.SZChina$1.17B-30%+35%2%n/a47.7%-0.3%
Chengdu Leejun Industrial 002651.SZChina$1.17B-20%+7%-6%n/a15.0%-2.3%
Chengdu Yunda Technology 300440.SZChina$1.17B-1%+9%6%n/a42.0%+8.7%
Sunward Intelligent Equipment 002097.SZChina$985M-38%+10%1%n/an/an/a
Xinjiang Machinery Research Institute 300159.SZChina$1.21B-28%+28%-40%n/an/an/a
Titagarh Rail Systems TITAGARH.NSIndia$967M-20%-10%10%34.8×45.4%+15.9%
Asian Star Anchor Chain 601890.SSChina$1.22B-23%+2%13%19.6×10.7%+13.5%
DAEHAN SHIPBUILDING 439260.KSSouth Korea$955M-62%+14%26%4.4×n/an/a
Austal ASB.AXAustralia$1.23B0%+11%-7%18.1×n/an/a
KTK 603680.SSChina$1.28B-24%-16%17%n/a-6.0%+2.3%
Greenbrier Companies GBXUnited States$1.29B-18%-24%4%13.0×n/an/a
Jupiter Wagons JWL.NSIndia$896M-35%-12%10%32.8×n/an/a
Alimak ALIG.STSweden$1.31B+13%-2%15%16.6×8.5%+12.9%
HD-Hyundai Marine Engine 071970.KSSouth Korea$887M-66%+54%26%8.7×-9.8%+10.2%

Questions

Who are Lindsay's main competitors?
Named competitors: Valmont Industries (VMI), T-L Irrigation (private or unlisted), Reinke Manufacturing (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Vossloh Aktiengesellschaft (VOS.DE), Willing New Energy (002667.SZ), Taiyuan Heavy Industry (600169.SS), Yamabiko (6250.T), Newag (NWG.WA), TADANO (6395.T).
Is Lindsay expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 20.4× against a peer median of 14.8×, 4th most expensive of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +4 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Lindsay stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.8% against -20.2% for the median peer; over one year -7.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.