Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › KEMPOWR.HE Kempower OyOpen in the cockpit ↗

Kempower OyKEMPOWR.HECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Finland · EUR·Industrials›Electrical Products
Momentum laggard 2
Mkt cap
$374M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
28%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$852,394
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-18.5 pp
WACC 10.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · EUR€6.01
1D+0.2%
1W-25.4%
1M-29.7%
3M-41.8%
6M-52.9%
YTD-60.6%
1Y-60.5%
ATR %5.7%
52w lowhigh65.4% off high

What Kempower Oy does

Employees: 825

Kempower Oy at a glance

Size Kempower Oy (KEMPOWR.HE) is a Finland Industrials company (Electrical Products) with a market value of $374M, the 59th largest of 65 Finland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €6.01 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 52.9%, against -22.9% for the median peer and -2.9% for the Finland market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 22.3% over the last twelve months (peer median -0.4%); the operating margin is -3.6% (peer median -1.3%).

Valuation It trades at 1.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.1× (3rd cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 18.5 points below its cost of capital (10.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 78KEMPOWR.HE 46
Six months, rebased to 100: Kempower Oy against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kempower Oy financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€281M€251M€224M€284M€104M
Revenue growth—+12%-21%+174%—
Gross profit€46.4M€38.9M€34.3M€99.1M€26.0M
EBITDA€3.60M-€2.48M-€19.0M€45.7M€9.77M
Net income-€8.80M-€12.4M-€23.2M€33.7M€3.55M
Free cash flow-€16.4M-€4.85M-€42.2M€30.3M-€9.75M
Capital expenditure€10.5M€8.25M€18.8M€9.63M€6.21M
Total debt€46.1M€35.8M€41.6M€25.2M€15.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kempower Oy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-20%0%002855315060040500266030048416083006002134206002410029633010823011527931301023603829600892300510301668300625KEMPOWR.HE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kempower Oy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%2×4×6×002855315060040500287900266030048416083006002134206002410029633010823011527931301023600892300510301668300625KEMPOWR.HERevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kempower Oy is the large dot.

Kempower Oy competitors and peer comparison

How Kempower Oy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kempower Oy against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKEMPOWR.HEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-29.7%-11.7%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-52.9%-22.9%3rd lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-65.4%-42.2%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+22.3%-0.4%6th highest of 21
Operating margin-3.6%-1.3%11th highest of 21
EV / Sales1.2×2.1×3rd cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-18.5 pp-5.3 pp4th lowest of 20
Net debt / EBITDA0.3×-0.3×3rd most indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Kempower Oy KEMPOWR.HEFinland$374M-53%+22%-4%1.2×n/an/a
Dongguan Chitwing Technology 002855.SZChina$375M-18%-9%-20%2.1×n/an/a
grems,Inc 3150.TJapan$376M-9%+6%22%1.3×-12.1%+11.9%
Beijing Dynamic Power 600405.SSChina$377M-19%-9%-51%5.8×n/an/a
Chang Lan Technology 002879.SZChina$371M-23%-1%9%1.7×2.2%+9.1%
Moso Power Supply Technology 002660.SZChina$371M-22%-6%-15%1.9×51.8%-0.1%
Shenzhen V&T Technologies 300484.SZChina$378M-26%-8%5%5.6×38.4%+3.9%
Hua Eng Wire & Cable 1608.TWTaiwan$378M-11%+8%9%1.3×n/an/a
Changshu Guorui Technology 300600.SZChina$379M-34%+29%-24%7.2×-19.1%-13.5%
Duk San Neolux 213420.KSSouth Korea$369M-60%+74%19%1.2×-16.7%+19.0%
Liaoning Shidai Wanheng 600241.SSChina$380M-12%+34%-13%4.1×n/an/a
Haoersai Technology 002963.SZChina$368M-5%-4%-21%6.4×n/an/a
Jiusheng Electric 301082.SZChina$381M-30%-21%5%2.3×18.5%+14.3%
Tianli Lithium Energy 301152.SZChina$367M-40%+24%-4%1.3×34.3%+12.1%
Mirai Industry 7931.TJapan$366M+13%+4%15%0.8×-10.5%+4.8%
Jiangnan Yifan Motor 301023.SZChina$387M-20%-16%22%9.2×20.8%+6.8%
Jiangsu Luokai Mechanical & Electrical 603829.SSChina$362M-55%0%2%1.2×31.5%+20.3%
Dasheng Times Cultural Investment 600892.SSChina$388M+21%+68%-26%6.2×n/an/a
Jilin Jinguan Electric 300510.SZChina$390M-25%-3%-28%3.1×n/an/a
Beijing HCRT Electrical Equipments 301668.SZChina$390M-38%+3%7%2.1×9.1%+16.9%
Guangdong PAK Corp. Co 300625.SZChina$360M-27%-11%-8%1.2×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Kempower Oy's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Dongguan Chitwing Technology (002855.SZ), grems,Inc (3150.T), Beijing Dynamic Power (600405.SS), Chang Lan Technology (002879.SZ), Moso Power Supply Technology (002660.SZ), Shenzhen V&T Technologies (300484.SZ), Hua Eng Wire & Cable (1608.TW), Changshu Guorui Technology (300600.SZ).
Is Kempower Oy expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.2× against a peer median of 2.1×, 3rd cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Kempower Oy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -52.9% against -22.9% for the median peer; over one year -60.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.