Loading…

J.B. HuntJBHTCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Trucking

Diversified trucking and logistics company running intermodal container transport, dedicated fleets and truck brokerage.

Momentum weak 31
Mkt cap
$20.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
78%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$219M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.2 pp
WACC 10.9%
Hurdle
+12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / A-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
76 days
21 Jan 2027
Close · USD$217.55
1D-0.7%
1W-1.6%
1M-4.8%
3M-18.3%
6M-11.3%
YTD+12.4%
1Y+28.6%
ATR %3.2%
Beta0.84
52w lowhigh27.4% off high

What J.B. Hunt does

Diversified trucking and logistics company running intermodal container transport, dedicated fleets and truck brokerage.

Intermodal moves freight in its own containers by rail, mainly with BNSF, with its trucks handling the first and last miles; Dedicated Contract Services supplies customers with a fleet and drivers under multi-year contracts. Those two carry the company, while brokerage arranges other carriers' trucks.

Products and services

  • Intermodal (rail+truck) transport
  • Dedicated contract trucking
  • Truckload brokerage (ICS)
  • Final-mile delivery

Customers

  • Retailers
  • Consumer goods shippers
  • Industrial manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Ground transportation
  • Intermodal & logistics

What could go right

  • Intermodal conversion from long-haul truck
  • Dedicated fleet growth

What could go wrong

  • Freight rate/volume cyclicality
  • Rail service disruptions

Moat: narrow (scale, network, installed base). Large owned container/chassis fleet and rail relationships give a cost and capacity edge over brokers.

Headquarters: Lowell, Arkansas, USA · Founded: 1961 · Employees: 31,750

Named competitors

J.B. Hunt at a glance

Size J.B. Hunt (JBHT) is a United States Industrials company (Trucking) with a market value of $20.3B, the 490th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $217.55 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.3%, against -16.9% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 6 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.4%); the operating margin is 7.3% (peer median 8.9%).

Valuation It trades at 24.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.4× (4th cheapest of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.2 points above its cost of capital (10.9% WACC).

Credit J.B. Hunt has 1 bond outstanding ($750M), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like A- at a weighted spread of 72 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 21 Jan 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026JBHT 90Peer median 85
Six months, rebased to 100: J.B. Hunt against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

J.B. Hunt financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$13.3B$12.0B$12.1B$12.8B$14.8B
Revenue growth—-1%-6%-13%—
Gross profit$1.34B$1.26B$1.25B$1.39B$1.65B
EBITDA$1.69B$1.59B$1.61B$1.76B$2.03B
Net income$676M$598M$571M$728M$969M
Free cash flow$966M$948M$618M-$118M$236M
Capital expenditure$528M$731M$865M$1.86B$1.54B
Total debt$1.12B$1.72B$1.79B$1.93B$1.57B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

J.B. Hunt competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-30%-25%-20%-15%-10%-15%-10%-5%XPOODFLKNXSAIATFIIJBHT6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. J.B. Hunt is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%15×20×25×XPOFDXFODFLKNXSAIATFIIJBHTRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. J.B. Hunt is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%XPOODFLKNXSAIATFIIJBHTGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. J.B. Hunt is the large dot.

J.B. Hunt competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (JBHT vs SNDR vs KNX vs WERN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
J.B. Hunt JBHT$20.3B-11%+11%7%24.3×16.8%
Schneider National SNDR$4.88B-10%+6%3%18.7×19.5%
Knight-Swift Transportation KNX$9.51B-9%+7%4%15.6×21.3%
Werner Enterprises WERN$1.62B-26%+15%2%18.8×n/a

How J.B. Hunt compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

J.B. Hunt against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureJBHTPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.8%-6.0%4th highest of 7
6-month return-11.3%-16.9%2nd highest of 6
Distance from 52-week high-27.4%-33.7%2nd highest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.6%+5.4%highest of 7
Operating margin7.3%8.9%3rd lowest of 7
Forward P/E24.3×24.4×4th cheapest of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)16.8%21.3%3rd least demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.5%+9.8%2nd lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+12.3 pp+11.5 pp3rd most demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.2 pp-0.6 pp2nd highest of 7
EV / EBITDA12.6×15.3×3rd cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×2.2×3rd least indebted of 7
Bond spread72 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
J.B. Hunt JBHTUnited States$20.3B-11%+11%7%24.3×16.8%+4.5%
XPO XPOUnited States$20.6B-13%+9%11%26.6×26.2%-4.4%
FedEx Freight FDXFUnited States$18.5Bn/a-1%6%24.7×n/an/a
Old Dominion ODFLUnited States$34.2B-17%+4%27%24.9×15.7%+6.5%
Knight-Swift Transportation KNXUnited States$9.51B-9%+7%4%15.6×21.3%+9.8%
Saia SAIAUnited States$8.86B-26%+9%11%24.0×27.4%+12.2%
TFI International TFII.TOCanada$7.86B-29%+3%7%14.2×11.6%+16.8%

J.B. Hunt bonds and credit

J.B. Hunt has 1 bond outstanding with $750M face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like A-. Weighted yield 5.28%, a spread of 72 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are J.B. Hunt's main competitors?
Named competitors: Schneider National (SNDR), Knight-Swift (KNX), Werner Enterprises (WERN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes XPO (XPO), FedEx Freight (FDXF), Old Dominion (ODFL), Knight-Swift Transportation (KNX), Saia (SAIA), TFI International (TFII.TO).
Is J.B. Hunt expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.3× against a peer median of 24.4×, 4th cheapest of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 17% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has J.B. Hunt stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.3% against -16.9% for the median peer; over one year +28.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.