Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › HILS.L Hill & Smith PLCOpen in the cockpit ↗

Hill & Smith PLCHILS.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Industrials›Miscellaneous Manufacturing

UK maker of road safety barriers, signage and galvanized steel products for infrastructure projects.

≈ A UK niche infrastructure-products/galvanizing companyMomentum weak 27
Mkt cap
$2.88B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$6.67M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.0 pp
WACC 14.0%
Hurdle
+14 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
124 days
10 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£2,765
1D-1.8%
1W-6.8%
1M-7.8%
3M-9.6%
6M+9.9%
YTD+29.2%
1Y+32.0%
ATR %3.8%
52w lowhigh17.3% off high

What Hill & Smith does

UK maker of road safety barriers, signage and galvanized steel products for infrastructure projects.

Sells road barriers and signs to highway authorities and contractors, so sales follow public infrastructure budgets and safety rules, while its galvanizing plants charge per tonne for coating steel with zinc to stop rust. The US has become a large part of the group, helped by US federal infrastructure spending.

In one line: A UK niche infrastructure-products/galvanizing company.

Products and services

  • Road safety barriers/systems
  • Galvanizing services
  • Signage & infrastructure products

Customers

  • Highway/road authorities
  • Construction contractors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Infrastructure products
  • Road safety systems, galvanizing…

What could go right

  • Infrastructure/highway investment programs
  • US market expansion

What could go wrong

  • Government infrastructure spending cyclicality
  • Steel/zinc commodity cost swings

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, regulatory licence). Certified road-safety product standards and a national galvanizing plant network.

Headquarters: Solihull, UK · Founded: 1889 · Employees: 4,590

Named competitors

Hill & Smith at a glance

Size Hill & Smith (HILS.L) is a United Kingdom Industrials company (Miscellaneous Manufacturing) with a market value of $2.88B, the 135th largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £2,765 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 9.9%, against -13.9% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is 16.1% (peer median 11.8%).

Valuation It trades at 19.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.7× (10th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.0 points above its cost of capital (14.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026HILS.L 109Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Hill & Smith against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Hill & Smith financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£888M£869M£855M£830M£732M
Revenue growth—+2%+3%+13%—
Gross profit£346M£341M£331M£307M£262M
EBITDA£186M£183M£175M£161M£125M
Net income£70.7M£82.5M£76.4M£68.8M£56.7M
Free cash flow£78.4M£108M£108M£103M£31.7M
Capital expenditure£37.9M£32.9M£26.3M£29.5M£20.9M
Total debtn/a£121M£146M£143M£144M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Hill & Smith competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%DAE301275TOM6370ASTRAL002372BRC300296002003SUPREMEINDANN7947003018VSVS301196002324601364902128002426HILS.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Hill & Smith is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×DAE301275TOM6370ASTRAL002372BRC300296002003SUPREMEINDANN794700301830119600232460132128HILS.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Hill & Smith is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%DAE301275TOM6370ASTRAL002372BRC300296002003SUPREMEIND7947003018301196601364902128002426HILS.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Hill & Smith is the large dot.

Hill & Smith competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (HILS.L vs VMI vs AZZ vs LNN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Hill & Smith HILS.L$2.88B+10%+3%16%19.5×19.4%
Valmont Industries VMI$7.74B-21%+5%14%15.9×10.7%
AZZ AZZ$3.76B-15%+10%17%16.9×9.8%
Lindsay LNN$1.08B-3%-6%11%20.4×6.0%

How Hill & Smith compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Hill & Smith against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureHILS.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.8%-4.1%9th lowest of 21
6-month return+9.9%-13.9%4th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.3%-29.5%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.8%+8.6%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin16.1%11.8%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E19.5×20.7×10th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)19.4%9.9%5th most demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.6%+7.7%9th lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+13.7 pp+3.3 pp4th most demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.0 pp+2.3 pp9th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA12.2×10.5×5th most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×0.9×7th least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Hill & Smith HILS.LUnited Kingdom$2.88B+10%+3%16%19.5×19.4%+5.6%
Daetwyler DAE.SWSwitzerland$2.72B-21%+2%10%24.7×9.3%+6.0%
Hanshow Technology 301275.SZChina$2.68B-5%+42%13%27.7×10.0%+13.6%
TOMRA Systems TOM.OLNorway$3.17B+6%+7%11%31.8×9.5%+9.2%
Kurita Water Industries 6370.TJapan$3.47B-39%+1%14%11.3×5.6%+8.5%
Astral ASTRAL.NSIndia$3.57B-20%+17%12%46.8×32.5%+15.6%
Zhejiang Weixing New Building Materials 002372.SZChina$2.27B-19%-12%14%17.8×9.9%+1.1%
Brady BRCUnited States$3.69B0%+10%16%12.0×1.0%+7.7%
Leyard Optoelectronic 300296.SZChina$2.20B-14%-14%4%28.8×17.1%+1.2%
Zhejiang Weixing Industrial Development 002003.SZChina$2.17B+28%+14%16%20.7×-4.2%+14.0%
Supreme Industries SUPREMEIND.NSIndia$4.24B-14%+17%10%33.6×25.8%+12.1%
Ansell ANN.AXAustralia$4.42B+79%+2%15%19.2×10.3%+3.0%
FP Corporation 7947.TJapan$1.61B+35%+4%9%15.5×-1.0%+5.1%
Jinfu Technology 003018.SZChina$1.51B-30%+85%26%39.3×18.0%+8.2%
Vesuvius VSVS.LUnited Kingdom$1.49B+2%+2%7%14.7×8.2%+4.4%
Xiamen Voke Mold & Plastic Engineering 301196.SZChina$1.48B-34%+34%12%32.6×19.6%+19.4%
Shanghai PRET Composites 002324.SZChina$1.36B-44%+27%1%45.7×n/an/a
Takuma 6013.TJapan$1.26B-1%+18%10%13.6×-5.4%+2.5%
PILLAR 6490.TJapan$1.25B-9%+10%22%11.5×18.0%+14.5%
China Lesso 2128.HKHong Kong$1.20B-42%-5%13%5.7×-4.5%-3.5%
Suzhou Victory Precision Manufacture 002426.SZChina$1.17B-41%+7%-20%n/a30.8%-18.0%

Questions

Who are Hill & Smith's main competitors?
Named competitors: Valmont Industries (VMI), AZZ (AZZ), Lindsay (LNN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Daetwyler (DAE.SW), Hanshow Technology (301275.SZ), TOMRA Systems (TOM.OL), Kurita Water Industries (6370.T), Astral (ASTRAL.NS), Zhejiang Weixing New Building Materials (002372.SZ).
Is Hill & Smith expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.5× against a peer median of 20.7×, 10th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +14 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Hill & Smith stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +9.9% against -13.9% for the median peer; over one year +32.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.