Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › DAE.SW Daetwyler Holding AGOpen in the cockpit ↗

Daetwyler Holding AGDAE.SWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Switzerland · CHF·Industrials›Miscellaneous Manufacturing

Swiss maker of elastomer sealing components, notably rubber closures and syringe seals for pharma packaging.

≈ A niche Swiss West Pharmaceutical ServicesMomentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$2.72B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
59%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.64M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.8 pp
WACC 6.8%
Hurdle
+3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
97 days
11 Feb 2027
Close · CHFCHF 130.80
1D-1.9%
1W-0.3%
1M+2.0%
3M-4.7%
6M-21.4%
YTD-20.1%
1Y-7.8%
ATR %2.2%
52w lowhigh23.8% off high

What Daetwyler does

Swiss maker of elastomer sealing components, notably rubber closures and syringe seals for pharma packaging.

In one line: A niche Swiss West Pharmaceutical Services.

Products and services

  • Pharma packaging (vial stoppers, syringe seals)
  • Automotive sealing components
  • General industry seals

Customers

  • Pharma & biotech manufacturers
  • Automotive OEMs

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials/Packaging components
  • Elastomer sealing solutions
  • Pharma closures & seals

What could go right

  • Vaccine and biologic injectable growth
  • Prefilled syringe adoption

What could go wrong

  • Rubber raw-material cost swings
  • Pharma customer concentration

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, customer qualification, process know-how). Pharma packaging parts require regulatory qualification, locking in suppliers for a drug's life.

Headquarters: Altdorf, Switzerland · Founded: 1915 · Employees: 7,823

Named competitors

Daetwyler at a glance

Size Daetwyler (DAE.SW) is a Switzerland Industrials company (Miscellaneous Manufacturing) with a market value of $2.72B, the 81st largest of 158 Switzerland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CHF 130.80 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.4%, against -11.3% for the median peer and +11.6% for the Switzerland market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.6%); the operating margin is 10.4% (peer median 12.4%).

Valuation It trades at 24.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 19.5× (9th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.8 points above its cost of capital (6.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 11 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 90DAE.SW 79
Six months, rebased to 100: Daetwyler against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Daetwyler financials

Reported figures in CHF; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCHF 1.12BCHF 1.10BCHF 1.11BCHF 1.15BCHF 1.15B
Revenue growth—-1%-4%0%—
Gross profitCHF 271MCHF 258MCHF 238MCHF 240MCHF 255M
EBITDACHF 193MCHF 189MCHF 176MCHF 179MCHF 203M
Net incomeCHF 82.2MCHF 80.8MCHF 31.1MCHF 66.8MCHF 105M
Free cash flowCHF 119MCHF 127MCHF 136MCHF 143MCHF 28.6M
Capital expenditureCHF 41.3MCHF 52.1MCHF 44.2MCHF 59.5MCHF 100M
Total debtn/aCHF 505MCHF 574MCHF 640MCHF 697M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Daetwyler competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%301275HILSTOM0023723002960020036370ASTRALBRCSUPREMEINDANN7947003018VSVS301196002324601364902128002426DAE.SW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Daetwyler is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×301275HILSTOM0023723002960020036370ASTRALBRCSUPREMEINDANN00301830119600232460132128DAE.SWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Daetwyler is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%-20%0%20%301275HILSTOM0023723002960020036370ASTRALBRCSUPREMEINDANN7947003018301196601364902128002426DAE.SWGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Daetwyler is the large dot.

Daetwyler competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (DAE.SW vs WST vs ATR vs STVN)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Daetwyler DAE.SW$2.72B-21%+2%10%24.7×9.3%
West Pharmaceutical Services WST$27.9B+23%+13%23%39.8×25.2%
AptarGroup ATR$9.03B+18%+9%12%23.4×4.3%
Stevanato STVN$3.70B-26%+12%18%19.3×10.6%

How Daetwyler compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Daetwyler against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDAE.SWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.0%-6.3%6th highest of 21
6-month return-21.4%-11.3%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.8%-29.5%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.0%+8.6%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin10.4%12.4%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E24.7×19.5×9th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.3%10.0%8th least demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.0%+7.7%10th lowest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+3.3 pp+3.5 pp10th least demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.8 pp+2.3 pp7th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA13.9×10.5×3rd most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA2.2×0.6×2nd most indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Daetwyler DAE.SWSwitzerland$2.72B-21%+2%10%24.7×9.3%+6.0%
Hanshow Technology 301275.SZChina$2.68B-5%+42%13%27.7×10.0%+13.6%
Hill & Smith HILS.LUnited Kingdom$2.88B+10%+3%16%19.5×19.4%+5.6%
TOMRA Systems TOM.OLNorway$3.17B+6%+7%11%31.8×9.5%+9.2%
Zhejiang Weixing New Building Materials 002372.SZChina$2.27B-19%-12%14%17.8×9.9%+1.1%
Leyard Optoelectronic 300296.SZChina$2.20B-14%-14%4%28.8×17.1%+1.2%
Zhejiang Weixing Industrial Development 002003.SZChina$2.17B+28%+14%16%20.7×-4.2%+14.0%
Kurita Water Industries 6370.TJapan$3.47B-39%+1%14%11.3×5.6%+8.5%
Astral ASTRAL.NSIndia$3.57B-20%+17%12%46.8×32.5%+15.6%
Brady BRCUnited States$3.69B0%+10%16%12.0×1.0%+7.7%
Supreme Industries SUPREMEIND.NSIndia$4.24B-14%+17%10%33.6×25.8%+12.1%
Ansell ANN.AXAustralia$4.42B+79%+2%15%19.2×10.3%+3.0%
FP Corporation 7947.TJapan$1.61B+35%+4%9%15.5×-1.0%+5.1%
Jinfu Technology 003018.SZChina$1.51B-30%+85%26%39.3×18.0%+8.2%
Vesuvius VSVS.LUnited Kingdom$1.49B+2%+2%7%14.7×8.2%+4.4%
Xiamen Voke Mold & Plastic Engineering 301196.SZChina$1.48B-34%+34%12%32.6×19.6%+19.4%
Shanghai PRET Composites 002324.SZChina$1.36B-44%+27%1%45.7×n/an/a
Takuma 6013.TJapan$1.26B-1%+18%10%13.6×-5.4%+2.5%
PILLAR 6490.TJapan$1.25B-9%+10%22%11.5×18.0%+14.5%
China Lesso 2128.HKHong Kong$1.20B-42%-5%13%5.7×-4.5%-3.5%
Suzhou Victory Precision Manufacture 002426.SZChina$1.17B-41%+7%-20%n/a30.8%-18.0%

Questions

Who are Daetwyler's main competitors?
Named competitors: West Pharmaceutical Services (WST), AptarGroup (ATR), Stevanato Group (STVN). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hanshow Technology (301275.SZ), Hill & Smith (HILS.L), TOMRA Systems (TOM.OL), Zhejiang Weixing New Building Materials (002372.SZ), Leyard Optoelectronic (300296.SZ), Zhejiang Weixing Industrial Development (002003.SZ).
Is Daetwyler expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.7× against a peer median of 19.5×, 9th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is +3 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Daetwyler stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.4% against -11.3% for the median peer; over one year -7.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.