Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › GRAB Grab Holdings Limited Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Grab Holdings Limited Class AGRABCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Air Freight/Couriers

Southeast Asian super-app offering ride-hailing, food/grocery delivery and digital financial services across the region.

≈ SE Asia's Uber+DoorDash+PayPal combinedMomentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$13.9B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
70%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$206M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.5 pp
WACC 8.5%
Hurdle
-31 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$3.41
1D-2.0%
1W+25.8%
1M+9.7%
3M-7.1%
6M-8.3%
YTD-31.7%
1Y-39.5%
ATR %4.5%
Beta1.22
52w lowhigh45.3% off high

What Grab does

Southeast Asian super-app offering ride-hailing, food/grocery delivery and digital financial services across the region.

Takes a commission from each ride and delivery order, plus fees from merchants for advertising and from users for faster delivery, with interest and payment fees from its financial arm. Mobility and delivery together carry the group. Its drivers are independent contractors, not employees. Singapore-based, it listed in the US through a SPAC in 2021.

In one line: SE Asia's Uber+DoorDash+PayPal combined.

Products and services

  • Mobility (ride-hailing)
  • Deliveries (food/grocery)
  • Financial Services (payments, lending)

Customers

  • Consumers across Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, P
  • Merchants and drivers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer internet
  • On-demand mobility and delivery (SE…
  • Ride-hailing, delivery and fintech…

What could go right

  • SE Asia digital economy growth
  • Path toward profitability across segments

What could go wrong

  • Intense regional competition/subsidy pressure
  • Regulatory risk on ride-hailing and digital banking

Moat: narrow (network effects, scale, brand). Regional super-app density across mobility, delivery and payments creates cross-selling advantages.

Headquarters: Singapore · Founded: 2012 · Employees: 12,012

Named competitors

Grab at a glance

Size Grab (GRAB) is a United States Industrials company (Air Freight/Couriers) with a market value of $13.9B, the 635th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $3.41 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.3%, against -1.7% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 22.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.8%); the operating margin is 10.7% (peer median 4.9%).

Valuation It trades at 23.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.2× (most expensive of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +48%, so the hurdle is -31 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.5 points below its cost of capital (8.5% WACC).

Credit Grab has 1 bond outstanding ($1.50B).

Short interest Short interest is 4.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 100GRAB 93
Six months, rebased to 100: Grab against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Grab financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.97B$3.37B$2.80B$2.36B$1.43B
Revenue growth—+20%+19%+65%—
Gross profit$1.76B$1.46B$1.17B$860M$77.0M
EBITDA$650M$379M$75.0M-$259M-$1.18B
Net income$586M$268M-$105M-$434M-$1.68B
Free cash flow$156M$134M$932M$118M-$961M
Capital expenditure$139M$123M$113M$92.0M$74.0M
Total debt$2.07B$2.05B$364M$793M$1.36B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Grab competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%+20%CHRWDHER20571519086280RBXB261891470023526936EXPD600096601598GXOSWIGGY9143LOGGRAB6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Grab is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%10×15×20×CHRW20571519086280R600233BXB261891470023526936EXPD600096601598GXO9143GRABRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Grab is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%CHRW20571519086280R600233BXB2618600096GXO9143LOGGRABGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Grab is the large dot.

Grab competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (GRAB vs SE vs DHER.DE vs C52.SI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Grab GRAB$13.9B-8%+23%11%23.3×17.8%
Sea Limited Sponsored ADR SE$49.1B-13%+43%8%18.0×11.7%
Delivery Hero DHER.DE$12.9B+31%+11%0%n/an/a
Comfortdelgro C52.SI$2.19B-10%+9%9%15.0×-8.2%

How Grab compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Grab against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureGRABPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+9.7%+5.2%6th highest of 21
6-month return-8.3%-1.7%9th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-45.3%-16.7%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+22.9%+10.8%4th highest of 21
Operating margin10.7%4.9%4th highest of 21
Forward P/E23.3×15.2×most expensive of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)17.8%-1.6%2nd most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+48.4%+8.5%2nd highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-30.5 pp-7.2 pp2nd least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.5 pp+6.1 pp8th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA16.6×8.6×2nd most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA-5.5×1.9×least indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Grab GRABUnited States$13.9B-8%+23%11%23.3×17.8%+48.4%
C.H. Robinson CHRWUnited States$14.5B-27%+10%5%17.2×9.2%0.0%
Delivery Hero SE TEMP DHE1.DEGermany$12.9Bn/a+11%0%n/an/an/a
Delivery Hero DHER.DEGermany$12.9B+31%+11%0%n/an/an/a
Zto Express-w 2057.HKHong Kong$15.6B-19%+21%20%10.2×-1.6%+13.5%
J&T Global Express 1519.HKHong Kong$11.9B-2%+32%6%18.6×-3.8%+51.4%
Hyundaiglovis 086280.KSSouth Korea$10.9B-13%+12%6%8.7×-10.8%+12.3%
Ryder System RUnited States$10.2B+11%+3%8%15.2×7.9%+8.5%
YTO Express 600233.SSChina$9.63B-13%+8%9%10.3×-12.2%+16.6%
Brambles BXB.AXAustralia$20.4B+2%+1%17%20.8×8.9%+8.3%
Jd Logistics 2618.HKHong Kong$9.10B-29%+29%3%6.9×-0.4%+23.4%
Nippon Express Hldgs 9147.TJapan$8.22B+35%+2%3%17.6×7.9%+4.4%
S.F 002352.SZChina$23.9B-7%+6%5%15.9×-12.9%+14.9%
S.F 6936.HKHong Kong$23.9B-12%+11%5%12.5×-11.4%+14.1%
Expeditors International EXPDUnited States$24.0B+18%+19%10%21.1×8.9%+2.9%
Yunnan Yuntianhua 600096.SSChina$7.17B-28%-19%11%9.3×-1.7%-1.5%
Sinotrans 601598.SSChina$6.74B+18%-1%0%14.8×4.3%+2.7%
GXO Logistics GXOUnited States$6.33B+7%+7%3%16.0×20.2%+16.3%
Swiggy SWIGGY.NSIndia$5.61B-32%+42%-15%n/an/an/a
SG Holdings Co., Ltd. 9143.TJapan$5.56B+1%+14%5%14.0×-2.6%+4.6%
Logista Integral LOG.MCSpain$5.42B+15%+4%2%15.8×-5.9%+5.4%

Grab bonds and credit

Grab has 1 bond outstanding with $1.50B face value.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Grab's main competitors?
Named competitors: GoTo Group (Gojek) (private or unlisted), Sea Limited (SE), Delivery Hero (Foodpanda) (DHER.DE), ComfortDelGro (C52.SI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes C.H. Robinson (CHRW), Delivery Hero SE TEMP (DHE1.DE), Delivery Hero (DHER.DE), Zto Express-w (2057.HK), J&T Global Express (1519.HK), Hyundaiglovis (086280.KS).
Is Grab expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.3× against a peer median of 15.2×, most expensive of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 18% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +48%, so the hurdle is -31 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Grab stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.3% against -1.7% for the median peer; over one year -39.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.