Loading…

Elopak ASAELO.OLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Norway · NOK·Materials›Containers/Packaging

Norwegian maker of liquid paperboard cartons and filling machines for dairy, juice and liquid food products.

≈ Norway's carton packaging maker for milk/juice, like a smaller Tetra PakMomentum weak 28
Mkt cap
$1.01B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
49%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$916,750
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.3 pp
WACC 5.5%
Hurdle
-16 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
95 days
9 Feb 2027
Close · NOKNOK 34.70
1D-1.7%
1W+1.8%
1M+1.2%
3M-5.5%
6M-11.0%
YTD-37.5%
1Y-26.7%
ATR %2.7%
52w lowhigh38.0% off high

What Elopak does

Norwegian maker of liquid paperboard cartons and filling machines for dairy, juice and liquid food products.

Places filling machines with dairies and juice makers, then earns repeatedly by selling them the cartons those machines run, so carton sales, not machines, carry most revenue. The installed base of machines is the hook that brings the repeat orders.

In one line: Norway's carton packaging maker for milk/juice, like a smaller Tetra Pak.

Products and services

  • Liquid paperboard cartons (Pure-Pak)
  • Carton filling machines
  • Aseptic packaging technology

Customers

  • Dairy processors
  • Juice/beverage companies
  • Food manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Packaging
  • Liquid carton manufacturing
  • Carton filling systems

What could go right

  • Shift to sustainable carton packaging from plastic
  • Emerging market dairy growth

What could go wrong

  • Pulp/paperboard input cost volatility
  • Competition from larger-scale Tetra Pak

Moat: narrow (installed base, switching costs). Filling-machine installed base creates recurring carton material sales, a razor/razorblade model.

Headquarters: Oslo, Norway · Founded: 1957 · Employees: 2,375

Named competitors

Elopak at a glance

Size Elopak (ELO.OL) is a Norway Materials company (Containers/Packaging) with a market value of $1.01B, the 63rd largest of 115 Norway companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NOK 34.70 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.0%, against -14.1% for the median peer and +2.7% for the Norway market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.3%); the operating margin is 8.6% (peer median 5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 11.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.0× (6th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.3 points above its cost of capital (5.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026ELO.OL 91Peer median 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Elopak against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Elopak financials

Reported figures in NOK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNOK 13.8BNOK 14.1BNOK 13.5BNOK 12.9BNOK 10.4B
Revenue growth—+5%+4%+25%—
Gross profitNOK 1.93BNOK 2.15BNOK 2.02BNOK 1.90BNOK 1.09B
EBITDANOK 1.95BNOK 2.03BNOK 1.88BNOK 1.83BNOK 1.07B
Net incomeNOK 841MNOK 721MNOK 709MNOK 766MNOK 212M
Free cash flowNOK 693MNOK 759MNOK 196MNOK 1.22B-NOK 245M
Capital expenditureNOK 979MNOK 1.03BNOK 1.27BNOK 466MNOK 442M
Total debtNOK 4.93BNOK 5.06BNOK 4.66BNOK 3.87BNOK 4.38B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Elopak competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%6036870020146030910028039939002787002303688020TIMETECHNOCAS0022637864601515GXI300151002243OI1904601968300057ELO.OL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Elopak is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%20×40×60×6036870020146030910028039939002787002303TIMETECHNOCAS7864GXI3001510022431904601968300057ELO.OLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Elopak is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%603091002803002303CAS0022637864GXI002243ELO.OLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Elopak is the large dot.

Elopak competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ELO.OL vs SIGN.SW vs IP)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Elopak ELO.OL$1.01B-11%0%9%11.8×-8.3%
SIG SIGN.SW$7.07B+23%-5%5%20.5×18.4%
International Paper IP$18.3B+6%+3%3%15.8×26.4%

How Elopak compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Elopak against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureELO.OLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.2%-7.7%3rd highest of 21
6-month return-11.0%-14.1%10th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-38.0%-39.9%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.5%+4.3%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin8.6%5.9%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.8×18.0×6th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-8.3%6.4%2nd least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.7%+3.4%3rd highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-16.0 pp+2.5 ppleast demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.3 pp-0.8 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.1×7.2×4th cheapest of 8
Net debt / EBITDA2.2×3.4×3rd least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Elopak ELO.OLNorway$1.01B-11%0%9%11.8×-8.3%+7.7%
Zhejiang Great Shengda Packing 603687.SSChina$995M-30%+1%3%32.6×n/an/a
Huangshan Novel 002014.SZChina$1.02B+5%+9%12%15.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang Zhongxin Environmental Protection Technology 603091.SSChina$991M-20%+31%22%14.5×7.8%+4.4%
Xiamen Jihong 002803.SZChina$956M-16%+12%6%21.3×6.4%+8.8%
Taiwan Hon Chuan Enterprise 9939.TWTaiwan$1.07B+7%0%15%10.2×n/an/a
Suzhou Hycan 002787.SZChina$1.09B-10%0%7%36.4×n/an/a
MYS 002303.SZChina$909M+26%+1%8%18.6×4.9%+3.4%
Guangzhou Fangbang Electronics 688020.SSChina$900M-51%-2%-28%n/an/an/a
Time Technoplast TIMETECHNO.NSIndia$891M-9%+16%11%11.0×n/an/a
Cascades CAS.TOCanada$1.15B+49%+1%5%9.2×-1.9%+3.1%
Zhejiang Great Southeast 002263.SZChina$871M-23%+5%-1%n/a31.7%-4.0%
Fuji Seal International 7864.TJapan$1.18B+38%+4%9%10.8×-9.5%+5.9%
Quzhou DFP New Material 601515.SSChina$843M-36%+13%-21%n/an/an/a
Gerresheimer GXI.DEGermany$1.21B+24%+9%-4%18.0×55.8%+10.3%
Shenzhen Changhong Technology 300151.SZChina$1.23B-12%-1%6%59.9×n/an/a
Shenzhen Leaguer 002243.SZChina$1.27B-18%+5%-3%19.9×44.6%+1.6%
O-I Glass OIUnited States$796M-44%-2%9%10.1×n/an/a
Cheng Loong 1904.TWTaiwan$788M+34%-3%6%61.8×3.9%+1.4%
Shanghai Baosteel Packaging 601968.SSChina$785M-19%+17%4%17.3×n/an/a
Shantou Wanshun New Material 300057.SZChina$784M-45%+29%1%66.5×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Elopak's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tetra Pak (private or unlisted), SIG Group (SIGN.SW), International Paper (IP). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Zhejiang Great Shengda Packing (603687.SS), Huangshan Novel (002014.SZ), Zhejiang Zhongxin Environmental Protection Technology (603091.SS), Xiamen Jihong (002803.SZ), Taiwan Hon Chuan Enterprise (9939.TW), Suzhou Hycan (002787.SZ).
Is Elopak expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.8× against a peer median of 18.0×, 6th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -16 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Elopak stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.0% against -14.1% for the median peer; over one year -26.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.