Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 601968.SS Shanghai Baosteel Packaging Co Ltd Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shanghai Baosteel Packaging Co Ltd Class A601968.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Containers/Packaging
Momentum neutral 51
Mkt cap
$785M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
32%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.23M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.9 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
171 days
26 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥4.15
1D-0.5%
1W+3.5%
1M-7.2%
3M-8.2%
6M-19.4%
YTD-22.3%
1Y-23.3%
ATR %2.5%
52w lowhigh35.9% off high

What Shanghai Baosteel Packaging does

Employees: 1,274

Shanghai Baosteel Packaging at a glance

Size Shanghai Baosteel Packaging (601968.SS) is a China Materials company (Containers/Packaging) with a market value of $785M, the 2819th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.15 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 19.4%, against -14.1% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 16.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.2%); the operating margin is 3.5% (peer median 6.3%).

Valuation It trades at 17.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.9× (7th most expensive of 14).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.9 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 26 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 87601968.SS 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Shanghai Baosteel Packaging against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shanghai Baosteel Packaging financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥10.2BCN¥8.77BCN¥8.31BCN¥7.75BCN¥8.53B
Revenue growth—+6%+7%-9%—
Gross profitCN¥1.17BCN¥632MCN¥643MCN¥670MCN¥652M
EBITDAn/aCN¥763MCN¥711MCN¥769MCN¥713M
Net incomeCN¥241MCN¥188MCN¥172MCN¥219MCN¥268M
Free cash flow-CN¥968M-CN¥192MCN¥511MCN¥109M-CN¥284M
Capital expenditureCN¥544MCN¥663MCN¥672MCN¥639MCN¥1.08B
Total debtCN¥4.13BCN¥3.06BCN¥3.40BCN¥2.53BCN¥2.61B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shanghai Baosteel Packaging competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-40%-20%0%3000571904OI002752EPL0613601515300566002263TIMETECHNO6880200023039907603499KRT00252251222519707504601968.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shanghai Baosteel Packaging is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%20×40×60×3000571904OI002752EPL300566TIMETECHNO0023039907KRT26032519707504601968.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shanghai Baosteel Packaging is the large dot.

Shanghai Baosteel Packaging competitors and peer comparison

How Shanghai Baosteel Packaging compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shanghai Baosteel Packaging against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure601968.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.2%-7.6%11th highest of 21
6-month return-19.4%-14.1%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-35.9%-39.9%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+16.6%+4.2%4th highest of 21
Operating margin3.5%6.3%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E17.3×16.9×7th most expensive of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.9 pp+0.5 pp10th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shanghai Baosteel Packaging 601968.SSChina$785M-19%+17%4%17.3×n/an/a
Shantou Wanshun New Material 300057.SZChina$784M-45%+29%1%66.5×n/an/a
Cheng Loong 1904.TWTaiwan$788M+34%-3%6%61.8×3.9%+1.4%
O-I Glass OIUnited States$796M-44%-2%9%10.1×n/an/a
Sunrise 002752.SZChina$766M-29%+8%6%11.1×-5.7%+17.2%
EPL EPL.NSIndia$752M-6%+17%12%15.7×16.0%+8.8%
Planetree International Development 0613.HKHong Kong$733M+151%-62%1,735%n/an/an/a
Quzhou DFP New Material 601515.SSChina$843M-36%+13%-21%n/an/an/a
Ningbo Exciton Technology 300566.SZChina$730M-2%-2%9%17.9×8.4%+8.4%
Zhejiang Great Southeast 002263.SZChina$871M-23%+5%-1%n/a31.7%-4.0%
Time Technoplast TIMETECHNO.NSIndia$891M-9%+16%11%11.0×n/an/a
Guangzhou Fangbang Electronics 688020.SSChina$900M-51%-2%-28%n/an/an/a
MYS 002303.SZChina$909M+26%+1%8%18.6×4.9%+3.4%
Ton Yi Industrial 9907.TWTaiwan$678M-19%-11%4%16.9×-6.3%+8.8%
Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology 603499.SSChina$669M-29%+9%10%n/a24.1%+16.4%
Karat Packaging KRTUnited States$669M+19%+12%13%20.5×-2.4%+9.6%
Zhejiang Zhongcheng Packing Material 002522.SZChina$658M-24%+4%5%n/a14.5%+2.1%
Xiamen Jihong 2603.HKHong Kong$945M-24%+18%6%12.3×-11.2%+8.1%
Okamoto Industries 5122.TJapan$648M+6%0%6%n/an/an/a
Pum-tech Korea 251970.KSSouth Korea$642M+70%+3%15%15.0×-4.2%+13.6%
Kohsoku 7504.TJapan$629M+75%+8%4%21.6×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Shanghai Baosteel Packaging's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shantou Wanshun New Material (300057.SZ), Cheng Loong (1904.TW), O-I Glass (OI), Sunrise (002752.SZ), EPL (EPL.NS), Planetree International Development (0613.HK), Quzhou DFP New Material (601515.SS), Ningbo Exciton Technology (300566.SZ).
Is Shanghai Baosteel Packaging expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.3× against a peer median of 16.9×, 7th most expensive of 14 in its peer set.
How has Shanghai Baosteel Packaging stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -19.4% against -14.1% for the median peer; over one year -23.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.