Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7504.T Kohsoku CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Kohsoku Corporation7504.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Materials›Containers/Packaging
Momentum leader 97
Mkt cap
$629M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
47%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.56M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
21.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.1 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
89 days
3 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥5,130
1D-5.3%
1W-4.8%
1M+16.5%
3M+8.1%
6M+75.1%
YTD+72.4%
1Y+73.2%
ATR %4.8%
52w lowhigh6.6% off high

What Kohsoku does

Employees: 1,147

Kohsoku at a glance

Size Kohsoku (7504.T) is a Japan Materials company (Containers/Packaging) with a market value of $629M, the 959th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥5,130 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 75.1%, against -15.5% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.4%); the operating margin is 4.2% (peer median 6.3%).

Valuation It trades at 21.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.4× (4th most expensive of 13).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.1 points above its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20267504.T 172Peer median 86
Six months, rebased to 100: Kohsoku against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kohsoku financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥133B¥124B¥116B¥106B¥98.9B
Revenue growth—+7%+9%+7%—
Gross profit¥26.4B¥24.0B¥22.4B¥20.2B¥19.2B
EBITDA¥6.74B¥5.93B¥5.51B¥5.18B¥4.88B
Net income¥4.34B¥3.76B¥3.47B¥3.11B¥2.98B
Free cash flow-¥1.57B-¥1.84B-¥1.21B¥3.15B¥1.83B
Capital expenditure¥2.39B¥4.51B¥2.29B¥1.56B¥849M
Total debt¥1.87B¥507M¥351M¥266M¥366M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kohsoku competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%-20%-10%0%+10%ZVSBT2519705122301193002522KRT603499688683990739503005660613301595EPL0022286886800027520027357504.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kohsoku is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%20×40×60×80×ZVSBT251970KRT9907300566301595EPL0027520027356882997504.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kohsoku is the large dot.

Kohsoku competitors and peer comparison

How Kohsoku compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kohsoku against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7504.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+16.5%-8.1%highest of 21
6-month return+75.1%-15.5%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-6.6%-42.4%3rd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.3%+2.4%6th highest of 21
Operating margin4.2%6.3%8th lowest of 21
Forward P/E21.6×17.4×4th most expensive of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.1 pp+0.7 pp5th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA14.5×8.5×2nd most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-0.2×0.5×5th least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kohsoku 7504.TJapan$629M+75%+8%4%21.6×n/an/a
Zignago Vetro ZV.MIItaly$628M-10%0%8%16.8×12.7%+7.7%
Oeneo SBT.PAFrance$617M-1%-10%14%25.4×1.0%+0.2%
Pum-tech Korea 251970.KSSouth Korea$642M+70%+3%15%15.0×-4.2%+13.6%
Okamoto Industries 5122.TJapan$648M+6%0%6%n/an/an/a
Ningbo Homelink Eco-iTech 301193.SZChina$602M-38%+44%-4%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Zhongcheng Packing Material 002522.SZChina$658M-24%+4%5%n/a14.5%+2.1%
Karat Packaging KRTUnited States$669M+19%+12%13%20.5×-2.4%+9.6%
Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology 603499.SSChina$669M-29%+9%10%n/a24.1%+16.4%
GuangDong Leary New Material Technology 688683.SSChina$586M-45%+83%5%n/an/an/a
Ton Yi Industrial 9907.TWTaiwan$678M-19%-11%4%16.9×-6.3%+8.8%
Pack 3950.TJapan$550M+13%+4%7%n/a-8.4%+5.6%
Ningbo Exciton Technology 300566.SZChina$730M-2%-2%9%17.9×8.4%+8.4%
Planetree International Development 0613.HKHong Kong$733M+151%-62%1,735%n/an/an/a
Guangdong Taili Technology 301595.SZChina$536M-12%+2%3%74.4×n/an/a
EPL EPL.NSIndia$752M-6%+17%12%15.7×16.0%+8.8%
Xiamen Hexing Packaging Printing 002228.SZChina$520M-25%+2%1%15.4×n/an/a
Shanghai HIUV New Materials 688680.SSChina$518M-28%-34%-29%n/a25.4%-4.7%
Sunrise 002752.SZChina$766M-29%+8%6%11.1×-5.7%+17.2%
Shenzhen Prince New Materials 002735.SZChina$514M-34%+2%-8%79.7×n/an/a
Ningbo Solartron Technology 688299.SSChina$507M-34%-15%-11%20.5×16.7%+0.9%

Questions

Which companies are Kohsoku's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Zignago Vetro (ZV.MI), Oeneo (SBT.PA), Pum-tech Korea (251970.KS), Okamoto Industries (5122.T), Ningbo Homelink Eco-iTech (301193.SZ), Zhejiang Zhongcheng Packing Material (002522.SZ), Karat Packaging (KRT), Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology (603499.SS).
Is Kohsoku expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 21.6× against a peer median of 17.4×, 4th most expensive of 13 in its peer set.
How has Kohsoku stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +75.1% against -15.5% for the median peer; over one year +73.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.