Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 5122.T Okamoto Industries, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Okamoto Industries, Inc.5122.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Materials›Containers/Packaging
Momentum neutral 59
Mkt cap
$648M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
49%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.20M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+0.8 pp
WACC 5.1%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
6 days
12 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥5,970
1D-3.7%
1W-3.7%
1M-2.5%
3M-2.5%
6M+6.2%
YTD+9.1%
1Y+18.2%
ATR %2.7%
52w lowhigh11.3% off high

What Okamoto Industries does

Employees: 2,593

Okamoto Industries at a glance

Size Okamoto Industries (5122.T) is a Japan Materials company (Containers/Packaging) with a market value of $648M, the 935th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥5,970 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 6.2%, against -11.0% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.7%); the operating margin is 6.3% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 0.7× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.5× (3rd cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.8 points above its cost of capital (5.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20265122.T 107Peer median 90
Six months, rebased to 100: Okamoto Industries against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Okamoto Industries financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥110B¥108B¥109B¥106B¥99.1B
Revenue growth—-1%+3%+7%—
Gross profit¥22.6B¥21.8B¥23.9B¥24.5B¥21.3B
EBITDA¥9.95B¥9.16B¥11.1B¥12.7B¥9.36B
Net income¥6.15B¥4.86B¥6.67B¥7.39B¥4.89B
Free cash flown/a-¥1.72B¥3.65B¥7.29B¥4.53B
Capital expendituren/a¥7.47B¥3.59B¥5.67B¥3.79B
Total debt¥3.21B¥3.44B¥3.56B¥3.56B¥3.67B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Okamoto Industries competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%-10%0%2519700025227504ZVKRT6034999907SBT3011936886833005660613EPL39500027523015953000576019681904OI5122.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Okamoto Industries is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%2×4×2519700025227504ZVKRT6034999907SBT3011936886833005660613EPL39500027523000576019681904OI5122.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Okamoto Industries is the large dot.

Okamoto Industries competitors and peer comparison

How Okamoto Industries compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Okamoto Industries against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure5122.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.5%-7.7%8th highest of 21
6-month return+6.2%-11.0%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-11.3%-38.0%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.1%+3.7%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.3%6.6%11th highest of 21
EV / Sales0.7×1.5×3rd cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.8 pp+1.1 pp9th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.5×8.5×4th cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-2.8×0.8×least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Okamoto Industries 5122.TJapan$648M+6%0%6%0.7×n/an/a
Pum-tech Korea 251970.KSSouth Korea$642M+70%+3%15%2.1×-4.2%+13.6%
Zhejiang Zhongcheng Packing Material 002522.SZChina$658M-24%+4%5%2.6×14.5%+2.1%
Kohsoku 7504.TJapan$629M+75%+8%4%0.7×n/an/a
Zignago Vetro ZV.MIItaly$628M-10%0%8%1.6×12.7%+7.7%
Karat Packaging KRTUnited States$669M+19%+12%13%1.4×-2.4%+9.6%
Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology 603499.SSChina$669M-29%+9%10%4.1×24.1%+16.4%
Ton Yi Industrial 9907.TWTaiwan$678M-19%-11%4%0.5×-6.3%+8.8%
Oeneo SBT.PAFrance$617M-1%-10%14%2.2×1.0%+0.2%
Ningbo Homelink Eco-iTech 301193.SZChina$602M-38%+44%-4%1.9×n/an/a
GuangDong Leary New Material Technology 688683.SSChina$586M-45%+83%5%2.9×n/an/a
Ningbo Exciton Technology 300566.SZChina$730M-2%-2%9%2.4×8.4%+8.4%
Planetree International Development 0613.HKHong Kong$733M+151%-62%1,735%225.1×n/an/a
EPL EPL.NSIndia$752M-6%+17%12%1.4×16.0%+8.8%
Pack 3950.TJapan$550M+13%+4%7%0.6×-8.4%+5.6%
Sunrise 002752.SZChina$766M-29%+8%6%0.9×-5.7%+17.2%
Guangdong Taili Technology 301595.SZChina$536M-12%+2%3%2.6×n/an/a
Shantou Wanshun New Material 300057.SZChina$784M-45%+29%1%1.1×n/an/a
Shanghai Baosteel Packaging 601968.SSChina$785M-19%+17%4%0.9×n/an/a
Cheng Loong 1904.TWTaiwan$788M+34%-3%6%1.1×3.9%+1.4%
O-I Glass OIUnited States$796M-44%-2%9%0.9×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Okamoto Industries's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Pum-tech Korea (251970.KS), Zhejiang Zhongcheng Packing Material (002522.SZ), Kohsoku (7504.T), Zignago Vetro (ZV.MI), Karat Packaging (KRT), Shanghai Sunglow Packaging Technology (603499.SS), Ton Yi Industrial (9907.TW), Oeneo (SBT.PA).
Is Okamoto Industries expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.7× against a peer median of 1.5×, 3rd cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Okamoto Industries stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +6.2% against -11.0% for the median peer; over one year +18.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.