Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002243.SZ Shenzhen Leaguer Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Leaguer Co., Ltd. Class A002243.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Materials›Containers/Packaging

Shenzhen operator that invests in, builds and manages high-tech enterprise innovation parks and incubation properties.

≈ A China-focused science-park operator/incubatorMomentum strong 62
Mkt cap
$1.27B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.8M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.0 pp
WACC 6.6%
Hurdle
+43 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
139 days
25 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥6.98
1D-1.0%
1W+6.6%
1M-0.4%
3M-6.6%
6M-18.2%
YTD-29.9%
1Y-29.7%
ATR %3.7%
52w lowhigh43.0% off high

What Shenzhen Leaguer does

Shenzhen operator that invests in, builds and manages high-tech enterprise innovation parks and incubation properties.

Earns rent and service charges from companies in its parks, plus gains when startups it has invested in grow or are sold, so income mixes steady property income with uneven investment results. Parks are developed with local governments, which often supply land or policy support.

In one line: A China-focused science-park operator/incubator.

Products and services

  • High-tech park development/leasing
  • Innovation-park property services
  • Investments in high-tech startups

Customers

  • Tech startups/tenants
  • Local-government innovation zones

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Innovation infrastructure
  • Tech-park development & operation

What could go right

  • Government innovation-park/incubation investment

What could go wrong

  • Real-estate leasing cycle
  • Startup investment write-down risk

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, installed base). Ties to an innovation ecosystem and local-government partnerships give preferred park sites.

Headquarters: Shenzhen, China · Employees: 4,392

Named competitors

Shenzhen Leaguer at a glance

Size Shenzhen Leaguer (002243.SZ) is a China Materials company (Containers/Packaging) with a market value of $1.27B, the 1886th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥6.98 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 18.2%, against -10.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.6%); the operating margin is -3.4% (peer median 6.1%).

Valuation It trades at 19.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.9× (7th most expensive of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 45% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +43 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.0 points below its cost of capital (6.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 88002243.SZ 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Leaguer against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Leaguer financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥2.52BCN¥2.35BCN¥2.31BCN¥2.50BCN¥2.60B
Revenue growth—+2%-8%-4%—
Gross profitCN¥668MCN¥456MCN¥493MCN¥574MCN¥712M
EBITDAn/aCN¥255MCN¥304MCN¥351MCN¥424M
Net incomeCN¥239MCN¥177MCN¥245MCN¥329MCN¥417M
Free cash flowCN¥10.3MCN¥5.76M-CN¥113M-CN¥510M-CN¥194M
Capital expenditureCN¥154MCN¥139MCN¥155MCN¥262MCN¥165M
Total debtCN¥5.24BCN¥6.16BCN¥6.18BCN¥5.43BCN¥4.62B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Leaguer competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%-20%0%300151GXIORA7864TRSCAS0027879939002565301093600210002969002014ELO603687603091002701002803002303688020002243.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Leaguer is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%25×50×75×300151GXIORA7864TRS002787301093600210002969603687603091002701002803002303002243.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Leaguer is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%20%40%60%GXIORA7864CAS301093002969ELO603091002701002803002303002243.SZGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Shenzhen Leaguer is the large dot.

Shenzhen Leaguer competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (002243.SZ vs 001979.SZ vs 600895.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Shenzhen Leaguer 002243.SZ$1.27B-18%+5%-3%19.9×44.6%
China Merchants Shekou Industrial Zone 001979.SZ$10.4B-10%-22%1%69.7×n/a
Shanghai Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park Development 600895.SS$5.71B-33%+89%26%36.4×n/a

How Shenzhen Leaguer compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Leaguer against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002243.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.4%-3.1%10th highest of 21
6-month return-18.2%-10.5%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-43.0%-36.4%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.2%+0.6%8th highest of 21
Operating margin-3.4%6.1%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E19.9×16.9×7th most expensive of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)44.6%4.9%3rd most demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.6%+6.7%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+43.0 pp+1.6 pp3rd most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.0 pp-0.6 pp5th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Leaguer 002243.SZChina$1.27B-18%+5%-3%19.9×44.6%+1.6%
Shenzhen Changhong Technology 300151.SZChina$1.23B-12%-1%6%59.9×n/an/a
Gerresheimer GXI.DEGermany$1.21B+24%+9%-4%18.0×55.8%+10.3%
Orora ORA.AXAustralia$1.34B+17%+6%11%15.8×2.5%-8.9%
Fuji Seal International 7864.TJapan$1.18B+38%+4%9%10.8×-9.5%+5.9%
TriMas TRSUnited States$1.37B-10%-33%5%19.1×n/an/a
Cascades CAS.TOCanada$1.15B+49%+1%5%9.2×-1.9%+3.1%
Suzhou Hycan 002787.SZChina$1.09B-10%0%7%36.4×n/an/a
Taiwan Hon Chuan Enterprise 9939.TWTaiwan$1.07B+7%0%15%10.2×n/an/a
Shanghai Shunho New Materials Technology 002565.SZChina$1.51B-50%-15%-3%n/an/an/a
Jiangsu Hualan New Pharmaceutical Material 301093.SZChina$1.53B-27%+6%5%77.4×50.9%+6.7%
Shanghai Zijiang Enterprise 600210.SSChina$1.54B-3%-18%10%11.3×n/an/a
Jiamei Food Packaging (Chuzhou) 002969.SZChina$1.55B-56%-10%6%86.4×22.4%+7.3%
Huangshan Novel 002014.SZChina$1.02B+5%+9%12%15.7×n/an/a
Elopak ELO.OLNorway$1.01B-11%0%9%11.8×-8.3%+7.7%
Zhejiang Great Shengda Packing 603687.SSChina$995M-30%+1%3%32.6×n/an/a
Zhejiang Zhongxin Environmental Protection Technology 603091.SSChina$991M-20%+31%22%14.5×7.8%+4.4%
ORG Technology 002701.SZChina$1.65B-22%+24%5%9.6×-5.2%+15.8%
Xiamen Jihong 002803.SZChina$956M-16%+12%6%21.3×6.4%+8.8%
MYS 002303.SZChina$909M+26%+1%8%18.6×4.9%+3.4%
Guangzhou Fangbang Electronics 688020.SSChina$900M-51%-2%-28%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Shenzhen Leaguer's main competitors?
Named competitors: China Merchants Shekou (001979.SZ), Zhangjiang Hi-Tech (600895.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shenzhen Changhong Technology (300151.SZ), Gerresheimer (GXI.DE), Orora (ORA.AX), Fuji Seal International (7864.T), TriMas (TRS), Cascades (CAS.TO).
Is Shenzhen Leaguer expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.9× against a peer median of 16.9×, 7th most expensive of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 45% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +43 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Shenzhen Leaguer stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -18.2% against -10.5% for the median peer; over one year -29.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.