Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › DNL.AX Dyno Nobel LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Dyno Nobel LimitedDNL.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Chemicals: Agricultural

Makes commercial explosives and blasting services for the mining industry, after Incitec Pivot exited fertilisers to focus on explosives.

≈ The dominant Australian mining-explosives maker, like a global Orica peerMomentum neutral 52
Mkt cap
$4.64B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$14.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
21.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.5 pp
WACC 8.6%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Official | Implied
BBB / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · AUDA$3.82
1D-2.8%
1W-4.3%
1M-5.5%
3M-2.0%
6M+5.5%
YTD+19.0%
1Y+10.4%
ATR %2.7%
52w lowhigh9.5% off high

What Dyno Nobel does

Makes commercial explosives and blasting services for the mining industry, after Incitec Pivot exited fertilisers to focus on explosives.

Sells explosives packaged with blasting services to mines and quarries, often under multi-year supply contracts at the mine site, so volume follows ore and coal production. It makes the ammonium nitrate that goes into most of its explosives itself. Operations are mostly in North America and Australia.

In one line: The dominant Australian mining-explosives maker, like a global Orica peer.

Products and services

  • Commercial explosives
  • Blasting services
  • Ammonium nitrate manufacturing

Customers

  • Mining companies (coal, metals, quarrying)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Ammonium nitrate manufacturing
  • Explosives/blasting products
  • On-site blasting services for miners

What could go right

  • Global mining production growth
  • Post-fertiliser-exit margin focus on explosives

What could go wrong

  • Mining capex cyclicality
  • Ammonia/gas input cost volatility

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base, regulatory licence). Large-scale ammonium nitrate plants and long-term mine-site blasting contracts are costly to replicate.

Headquarters: Melbourne, Australia · Founded: 1918 · Employees: 5,500

Named competitors

Dyno Nobel at a glance

Size Dyno Nobel (DNL.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Chemicals: Agricultural) with a market value of $4.64B, the 71st largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$3.82 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 5.5%, against -25.6% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 16.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.5%); the operating margin is 14.9% (peer median 10.7%).

Valuation It trades at 21.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.7× (6th most expensive of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.5 points below its cost of capital (8.6% WACC).

Credit Dyno Nobel has 2 bonds outstanding ($343M), rated BBB by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 160 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026DNL.AX 104Peer median 75
Six months, rebased to 100: Dyno Nobel against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Dyno Nobel financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2025-09-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueA$3.74BA$3.71BA$3.54BA$5.40BA$5.52B
Revenue growth—+5%-35%-2%—
Gross profitA$1.04BA$1.02BA$883MA$1.00BA$1.49B
EBITDAA$841MA$768MA$618MA$674MA$1.19B
Net incomeA$169MA$146M-A$435MA$560MA$1.01B
Free cash flow-A$7.70MA$100M-A$88.5MA$206MA$659M
Capital expenditureA$355MA$474MA$379MA$495MA$434M
Total debtn/aA$2.02BA$1.96BA$1.97BA$1.96B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Dyno Nobel competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%-10%0%+10%UPLFACTSMGICL600486MOS000902603077000155301035002539YAR002312002258600596SUMICHEMATUL000422BAYERCROPDNL.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Dyno Nobel is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%25×50×75×UPLSMGICLMOS000902000155301035YAR002312002258TATACHEMDNL.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Dyno Nobel is the large dot.

Dyno Nobel competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (DNL.AX vs ORI.AX vs 002683.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Dyno Nobel DNL.AX$4.64B+6%-17%15%21.1×n/a
Orica ORI.AX$7.23B+1%+2%11%18.2×6.9%
Guangdong Hongda 002683.SZ$3.86B-7%+15%10%23.7×4.9%

How Dyno Nobel compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Dyno Nobel against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureDNL.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.5%-4.3%10th lowest of 21
6-month return+5.5%-25.6%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-9.5%-33.7%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-16.6%+5.5%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin14.9%10.7%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E21.1×15.7×6th most expensive of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.5 pp+0.6 pp9th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA9.7×8.8×5th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA1.7×2.3×5th least indebted of 11
Bond spread160 bp118 bp2nd widest of 5

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Dyno Nobel DNL.AXAustralia$4.64B+6%-17%15%21.1×n/an/a
UPL UPL.NSIndia$4.78B-18%+10%14%14.8×10.9%+6.0%
Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore FACT.NSIndia$5.14B-18%+32%0%n/an/an/a
Scotts Miracle-Gro SMGUnited States$3.77B+6%-4%14%13.6×7.5%-7.8%
ICL ICLUnited States$6.04B-27%+11%11%11.5×3.5%+7.2%
Jiangsu Yangnong Chemical 600486.SSChina$3.42B-22%+3%13%16.2×0.8%+3.8%
Mosaic Company (The) MOSUnited States$7.11B+2%0%3%26.2×n/an/a
YONFER Agricultural Technology 000902.SZChina$2.69B-2%+15%11%11.4×n/an/a
Sichuan Hebang Biotechnology 603077.SSChina$2.59B-30%-24%-1%n/an/an/a
Sichuan New Energy Power 000155.SZChina$2.54B-47%+98%32%12.9×n/an/a
Shandong Weifang Rainbow Chemical 301035.SZChina$2.42B-32%+6%12%14.9×-0.1%+15.0%
Chengdu Wintrue 002539.SZChina$2.09B-24%+6%6%11.7×n/an/a
Yara International YAR.OLNorway$11.0B-26%+2%13%8.2×-6.9%+8.3%
Sichuan Development Lomon 002312.SZChina$1.93B-36%+5%6%35.0×8.2%+14.0%
Lier Chemical 002258.SZChina$1.85B+20%+6%8%21.0×n/an/a
Zhejiang Xinan Chemical Industrial 600596.SSChina$1.75B-31%+5%2%22.9×12.4%+3.1%
Sumitomo Chemical India SUMICHEM.NSIndia$1.74B-34%-3%18%28.1×23.4%+4.1%
Tata Chemicals TATACHEM.NSIndia$1.64B-25%+2%3%85.9×n/an/a
Atul ATUL.NSIndia$1.63B-26%+18%12%19.7×18.2%+11.0%
Hubei Yihua Chemical Industry 000422.SZChina$1.60B-42%+15%5%15.2×n/an/a
Bayer Cropscience India BAYERCROP.NSIndia$1.58B-28%-5%15%19.5×16.1%+5.9%

Dyno Nobel bonds and credit

Dyno Nobel has 2 bonds outstanding with $343M face value. The agencies rate it BBB; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 6.42%, a spread of 160 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Dyno Nobel's main competitors?
Named competitors: Orica (ORI.AX), Enaex (private or unlisted), EPC Groupe (private or unlisted), Guangdong Hongda Holdings (002683.SZ), AECI (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes UPL (UPL.NS), Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore (FACT.NS), Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG), ICL (ICL), Jiangsu Yangnong Chemical (600486.SS), Mosaic Company (The) (MOS).
Is Dyno Nobel expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 21.1× against a peer median of 15.7×, 6th most expensive of 19 in its peer set.
How has Dyno Nobel stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +5.5% against -25.6% for the median peer; over one year +10.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.