Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CLH Clean Harbors, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Clean Harbors, Inc.CLHCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Environmental Services

US hazardous-waste disposal and industrial/environmental services company; also collects and re-refines used motor oil.

Momentum weak 39
Mkt cap
$15.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
95%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$190M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
29.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.3 pp
WACC 8.6%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB+ / BB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · USD$284.10
1D+2.3%
1W-6.0%
1M-10.5%
3M-8.3%
6M-2.4%
YTD+21.2%
1Y+37.3%
ATR %3.2%
Beta0.34
52w lowhigh15.4% off high

What Clean Harbors does

US hazardous-waste disposal and industrial/environmental services company; also collects and re-refines used motor oil.

Charges fees to take in and treat hazardous waste at its own incinerators, landfills and treatment sites, which are hard to permit, and collects used motor oil that it re-refines into base oil, so profit there moves with oil-linked base-oil prices. The 2012 purchase of Safety-Kleen added the oil re-refining and parts-cleaning services. Alan McKim founded it in 1980 and still leads it.

Products and services

  • Environmental Services
  • Safety-Kleen used-oil re-refining
  • Industrial & field services
  • Reused PPE/SKSS

Customers

  • Industrial manufacturers
  • Refineries & chemical plants
  • Government/municipal clients
  • Auto service shops

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Environmental services
  • Hazardous waste management
  • Incineration & disposal

What could go right

  • Industrial/chemical plant activity
  • PFAS remediation regulation

What could go wrong

  • Used-oil economics tied to oil prices
  • Heavy capex/permitting

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, scale, installed base). Permitted incinerators and disposal sites are costly and slow to replicate; large collection network.

Headquarters: Norwell, Massachusetts, US · Founded: 1980 · Employees: 22,155

Named competitors

Clean Harbors at a glance

Size Clean Harbors (CLH) is a United States Industrials company (Environmental Services) with a market value of $15.0B, the 599th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $284.10 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.4%, against +20.5% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +11.6%); the operating margin is 13.2% (peer median 7.3%).

Valuation It trades at 29.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 29.9× (4th cheapest of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.3 points above its cost of capital (8.6% WACC).

Credit Clean Harbors has 1 bond outstanding ($300M), rated BB+ by the agencies and trading like BB at a weighted spread of 137 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 122CLH 97
Six months, rebased to 100: Clean Harbors against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Clean Harbors financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$6.56B$6.03B$5.89B$5.41B$5.17B
Revenue growth—+2%+9%+5%—
Gross profit$1.70B$1.43B$1.41B$1.28B$1.26B
EBITDA$1.34B$1.13B$1.08B$992M$995M
Net income$528M$391M$402M$378M$412M
Free cash flow$501M$442M$346M$312M$281M
Capital expenditure$524M$429M$442M$425M$347M
Total debt$3.15B$3.27B$3.23B$2.62B$2.59B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Clean Harbors competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%-10%0%+10%+20%GFLCWSTFCCWCNCWY600323CLH6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Clean Harbors is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+5%+10%+15%+20%+25%20×40×60×GFLCWSTFCCWCNCWY600323CLHRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Clean Harbors is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%GFLCWSTFCCWCNCWY600323CLHGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Clean Harbors is the large dot.

Clean Harbors competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CLH vs RSG vs WM vs VIE.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Clean Harbors CLH$15.0B-2%+10%13%29.2×11.7%
Republic Services RSG$75.2B+24%+4%20%31.9×6.6%
Waste Management WM$93.9B+10%+5%19%27.4×5.8%
Veolia Environnement VIE.PA$27.7B-3%0%8%14.1×8.3%

How Clean Harbors compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Clean Harbors against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCLHPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-10.5%+9.2%lowest of 7
6-month return-2.4%+20.5%3rd lowest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-15.4%-4.4%2nd lowest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.1%+11.6%4th highest of 7
Operating margin13.2%7.3%3rd highest of 7
Forward P/E29.2×29.9×4th cheapest of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)11.7%15.6%4th least demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.9%+12.6%2nd highest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.2 pp+3.0 pp3rd least demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.3 pp-2.7 pphighest of 7
EV / EBITDA13.1×17.7×3rd cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA2.0×3.2×2nd least indebted of 6
Bond spread137 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Clean Harbors CLHUnited States$15.0B-2%+10%13%29.2×11.7%+13.9%
GFL Environmental GFLUnited States$20.2B+26%+5%5%58.8×42.5%+7.9%
Casella Waste Systems CWSTUnited States$6.25B+15%+14%5%72.1×36.3%+18.8%
Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas FCC.MCSpain$5.53B-10%+10%7%15.1×2.9%+9.5%
Waste Connections WCN.TOCanada$47.6B+27%+6%18%31.6×10.7%+12.6%
Cleanaway Waste Management CWY.AXAustralia$4.68B+35%+13%8%28.2×20.5%+12.6%
Grandblue Environment 600323.SSChina$3.78B-3%+24%24%11.0×-4.7%+13.3%

Clean Harbors bonds and credit

Clean Harbors has 1 bond outstanding with $300M face value. The agencies rate it BB+; its bonds trade like BB. Weighted yield 5.99%, a spread of 137 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Clean Harbors's main competitors?
Named competitors: Republic Services (RSG), Waste Management (WM), Stericycle (private or unlisted), Veolia (VIE.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes GFL Environmental (GFL), Casella Waste Systems (CWST), Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC.MC), Waste Connections (WCN.TO), Cleanaway Waste Management (CWY.AX), Grandblue Environment (600323.SS).
Is Clean Harbors expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 29.2× against a peer median of 29.9×, 4th cheapest of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +14%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Clean Harbors stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.4% against +20.5% for the median peer; over one year +37.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.