Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › AZJ.AX Aurizon Holdings Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Aurizon Holdings Ltd.AZJ.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Industrials›Railroads

Australian rail freight operator hauling coal in Queensland and operating a national bulk/freight rail network.

≈ A rail freight operator like a smaller CSX focused on coal haulageMomentum neutral 45
Mkt cap
$4.49B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.2 pp
WACC 6.6%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB- / —
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
94 days
8 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$3.85
1D0.0%
1W-1.0%
1M+4.9%
3M-8.6%
6M-4.9%
YTD+5.5%
1Y+11.3%
ATR %1.6%
52w lowhigh12.9% off high

What Aurizon does

Australian rail freight operator hauling coal in Queensland and operating a national bulk/freight rail network.

Hauls coal for mining companies under long-term contracts, and separately earns regulated access charges from running the Central Queensland coal rail network used by every coal haulier. A regulator approves the allowed return on that network, so the regulated side earns steadily while haulage follows mining volumes. Most of the business is in Queensland.

In one line: A rail freight operator like a smaller CSX focused on coal haulage.

Products and services

  • Queensland coal rail haulage
  • Network access (Central Queensland Coal Network)
  • Bulk freight (grain, minerals)

Customers

  • Coal mining companies
  • Grain and mineral shippers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Rail transport
  • Coal haulage
  • Bulk/freight rail network

What could go right

  • Coal export volume growth
  • Regulated network revenue stability

What could go wrong

  • Coal demand decline (energy transition)
  • Regulatory tariff resets

Moat: wide (regulatory licence, installed base, scale). Owns/operates regulated rail infrastructure and rolling stock that would be prohibitively costly to duplicate.

Headquarters: Brisbane, Australia · Founded: 1865 · Employees: 5,997

Named competitors

  • Pacific National (private) private or unlisted
  • Genesee & Wyoming Australia private or unlisted
  • Qube Holdings private or unlisted

Aurizon at a glance

Size Aurizon (AZJ.AX) is an Australia Industrials company (Railroads) with a market value of $4.49B, the 72nd largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$3.85 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 4.9%, against +2.6% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 15 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.0%); the operating margin is 21.2% (peer median 11.9%).

Valuation It trades at 14.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.3× (7th cheapest of 15).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.2 points below its cost of capital (6.6% WACC).

Credit Aurizon has 1 bond outstanding ($172M), rated BBB- by the agencies.

Next results Next results expected around 8 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 102AZJ.AX 93
Six months, rebased to 100: Aurizon against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

Aurizon financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$4.10BA$4.10BA$3.87BA$3.76BA$3.44B
Revenue growth—+6%+3%+9%—
Gross profitA$885MA$890MA$852MA$849MA$712M
EBITDAA$1.61BA$1.61BA$1.49BA$1.54BA$1.32B
Net incomeA$362MA$362MA$303MA$406MA$276M
Free cash flowA$397MA$397MA$435MA$473MA$106M
Capital expenditureA$751MA$751MA$696MA$823MA$758M
Total debtn/aA$5.63BA$5.50BA$5.08BA$5.28B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aurizon competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-10%0%+10%+20%0%+5%+10%+15%900990079001CONCOR9142601333GATX900890219045JFNGET601006AZJ.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aurizon is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%10×20×30×900990079001CONCOR9142601333GATX90089045JFNGETAZJ.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aurizon is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%CONCOR6013339021JFNGETAZJ.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Aurizon is the large dot.

Aurizon competitors and peer comparison

How Aurizon compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aurizon against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAZJ.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.9%+6.1%8th highest of 15
6-month return-4.9%+2.6%3rd lowest of 15
Distance from 52-week high-12.9%-9.3%5th lowest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.9%+5.0%6th highest of 15
Operating margin21.2%11.9%4th highest of 15
Forward P/E14.8×15.3×7th cheapest of 15
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.4%4.4%3rd most demanding of 6
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.7%+14.3%lowest of 6
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.3 pp-12.5 pp2nd most demanding of 6
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.2 pp-1.2 pp5th highest of 15
EV / EBITDA7.5×13.5×cheapest of 13
Net debt / EBITDA3.4×5.3×3rd least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Aurizon AZJ.AXAustralia$4.49B-5%+6%21%14.8×4.4%+6.7%
Keisei Electric Railway 9009.TJapan$4.51B+26%+4%11%15.5×n/an/a
Odakyu Electric Railway 9007.TJapan$3.80B+11%+3%13%15.1×n/an/a
Tobu Railway 9001.TJapan$3.58B+3%+5%11%10.0×n/an/a
Container Corporation of India CONCOR.NSIndia$3.55B-16%+1%14%25.4×33.8%+7.2%
Kyushu Railway 9142.TJapan$3.53B0%+5%14%11.3×n/an/a
Guangshen Railway 601333.SSChina$3.16B+1%+5%6%16.3×-14.9%+11.9%
GATX GATXUnited States$6.38B-2%+30%30%17.0×n/an/a
Keio 9008.TJapan$2.80B+3%+10%10%10.5×n/an/a
Keikyu 9006.TJapan$2.73B+2%+4%11%13.4×n/an/a
West Japan Railway 9021.TJapan$9.19B+12%+6%10%13.8×2.4%+14.9%
Keihan 9045.TJapan$2.15B+3%+10%15%11.5×n/an/a
Jungfraubahn JFN.SWSwitzerland$1.81B+1%-4%21%22.2×4.4%+22.3%
Getlink GET.PAFrance$12.3B+9%+9%40%35.3×10.1%+14.3%
Daqin Railway 601006.SSChina$14.5B-7%+3%6%16.3×n/an/a

Aurizon bonds and credit

Aurizon has 1 bond outstanding with $172M face value. The agencies rate it BBB-.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Aurizon's main competitors?
Named competitors: Pacific National (private) (private or unlisted), Genesee & Wyoming Australia (private or unlisted), Qube Holdings (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Keisei Electric Railway (9009.T), Odakyu Electric Railway (9007.T), Tobu Railway (9001.T), Container Corporation of India (CONCOR.NS), Kyushu Railway (9142.T), Guangshen Railway (601333.SS).
Is Aurizon expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.8× against a peer median of 15.3×, 7th cheapest of 15 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Aurizon stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -4.9% against +2.6% for the median peer; over one year +11.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.