Loading…

AXT, Inc.AXTICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment

Maker of compound semiconductor substrates (gallium arsenide, indium phosphide) used in lasers, sensors and RF chips.

Momentum laggard 3
Mkt cap
$2.55B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$626M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-10.1 pp
WACC 14.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
104 days
18 Feb 2027
Close · USD$38.88
1D+5.9%
1W-29.4%
1M-45.7%
3M-47.3%
6M-66.6%
YTD+137.8%
1Y+327.2%
ATR %17.7%
Beta4.19
52w lowhigh72.8% off high

What AXT does

Maker of compound semiconductor substrates (gallium arsenide, indium phosphide) used in lasers, sensors and RF chips.

Sells wafers, the base slices on which customers grow their chips, per piece, so revenue follows customers' device volumes, with indium phosphide for optical-communication lasers one important line. Most production is in China through its Tongmei subsidiary, so Chinese export licensing and trade rules affect what it can ship.

Products and services

  • Gallium arsenide substrates
  • Indium phosphide substrates
  • Germanium substrates

Customers

  • RF chip, laser and sensor manufacturers (telecom,

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Electronic production equipment
  • Compound semiconductor substrates

What could go right

  • Data-center optical interconnect demand
  • 5G/RF chip substrate demand

What could go wrong

  • China manufacturing/export-control exposure
  • Substrate market pricing competition

Moat: narrow (process know-how, IP / patents). Crystal-growth process know-how for compound semiconductor substrates is difficult to replicate.

Headquarters: Fremont, California, US · Founded: 1986 · Employees: 1,072

Named competitors

AXT at a glance

Size AXT (AXTI) is a United States Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $2.55B, the 1644th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $38.88 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 66.6%, against -22.6% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 89.1% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.0%); the operating margin is 19.6% (peer median 6.0%).

Valuation It trades at 16.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 30.2× (5th cheapest of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.1 points below its cost of capital (14.7% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $98.5M at 30 Jun 2026 — 0.8 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Short interest Short interest is 18.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

25507510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 80AXTI 31
Six months, rebased to 100: AXT against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

AXT financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$171M$88.3M$99.4M$75.8M$141M
Revenue growth—-11%+31%-46%—
Gross profit$82.5M$11.2M$23.8M$13.3M$52.1M
EBITDAn/a-$12.9M-$5.82M-$12.8M$20.7M
Net income$31.7M-$21.3M-$11.6M-$17.9M$15.8M
Free cash flown/a-$18.8M-$17.9M-$7.07M-$37.2M
Capital expendituren/a$6.00M$5.77M$10.5M$28.5M
Total debt$73.7M$70.0M$49.8M$55.7M$48.9M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

AXT competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%30083503422068836261963014860028595214VECO349167700024022354300657EXENS688686BHE002925002456300083000032AXTI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. AXT is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%50×100×30083568836261963014860028595214VECO349167700024022354300657EXENS688686BHE002925300083000032AXTIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. AXT is the large dot.

AXT competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AXTI vs 5802.T vs COHR vs 5016.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
AXT AXTI$2.55B-67%+89%20%16.2×n/a
Sumitomo Electric Industries 5802.T$27.3B-47%+14%9%11.4×13.3%
Coherent COHR$38.0B-42%+23%14%16.6×n/a
JX Advanced Metals 5016.T$14.6B-49%+30%11%12.7×22.2%
Dowa 5714.T$2.78B-22%+29%6%6.9×n/a

How AXT compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

AXT against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAXTIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-45.7%-16.6%lowest of 21
6-month return-66.6%-22.6%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-72.8%-50.2%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+89.1%+14.0%highest of 21
Operating margin19.6%6.0%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E16.2×30.2×5th cheapest of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-10.1 pp-2.8 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
AXT AXTIUnited States$2.55B-67%+89%20%16.2×n/an/a
Sinomag Technology 300835.SZChina$2.54B+10%+18%6%75.2×n/an/a
LG Display 034220.KSSouth Korea$2.61B-42%-7%2%n/a-13.4%+1.2%
Forehope Electronic (Ningbo) 688362.SSChina$2.67B-19%+19%0%86.7×n/an/a
Marketech International 6196.TWTaiwan$2.68B+8%+44%7%13.0×6.3%+15.5%
Shenzhen Zesum Technology 301486.SZChina$2.41B-42%+57%3%99.2×n/an/a
Zhejiang Jiemei Electronic & Technology 002859.SZChina$2.71B-21%+26%13%47.3×n/an/a
Nippon Electric Glass 5214.TJapan$2.32B-44%+3%8%22.6×2.4%+5.1%
VECO VECOUnited States$2.27B-37%-3%4%13.3×37.1%+7.9%
Universal Microwave Technology 3491.TWOTaiwan$2.26B-36%+36%27%42.9×n/an/a
Alps Alpine 6770.TJapan$2.23B-24%+5%3%10.8×-3.8%+7.3%
Shenzhen H&T Intelligent Control 002402.SZChina$2.23B-49%+2%6%41.3×n/an/a
Foxconn Technology 2354.TWTaiwan$2.23B-11%+13%2%13.3×n/an/a
XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech 300657.SZChina$2.21B-18%+4%8%28.2×n/an/a
Exosens EXENS.PAFrance$2.95B-11%+15%17%27.5×24.3%+25.6%
OPT Machine Vision Tech 688686.SSChina$2.96B+48%+38%12%75.4×n/an/a
Benchmark Electronics BHEUnited States$2.16B-29%+13%4%17.7×13.8%+5.3%
Xiamen Intretech 002925.SZChina$2.16B-3%+39%9%32.1×n/an/a
OFILM 002456.SZChina$3.10B-35%-17%-1%n/a27.0%-14.4%
Guangdong Create Century Intelligent Equipment 300083.SZChina$3.13B+7%+35%11%24.4×n/an/a
Shenzhen SED Industry 000032.SZChina$2.03B-36%+5%1%42.9×7.0%+8.9%

AXT backlog

AXT reported $98.5M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Jun 2026. That is 0.8 years of trailing revenue already under contract.

Questions

Who are AXT's main competitors?
Named competitors: Sumitomo Electric (5802.T), Freiberger Compound Materials (private or unlisted), Coherent Corp (COHR), JX Advanced Metals (5016.T), Dowa Holdings (5714.T), Umicore (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Sinomag Technology (300835.SZ), LG Display (034220.KS), Forehope Electronic (Ningbo) (688362.SS), Marketech International (6196.TW), Shenzhen Zesum Technology (301486.SZ), Zhejiang Jiemei Electronic & Technology (002859.SZ).
Is AXT expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.2× against a peer median of 30.2×, 5th cheapest of 19 in its peer set.
How has AXT stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -66.6% against -22.6% for the median peer; over one year +327.2%.
What is AXT's backlog?
AXT's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $98.5M at 30 Jun 2026.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.