Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300835.SZ Sinomag Technology Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Sinomag Technology Co., Ltd. Class A300835.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Information Technology›Electronic Production Equipment

Anhui maker of permanent ferrite magnet tiles used mostly in automotive motors, with plants in China and Vietnam.

Momentum neutral 47
Mkt cap
$2.54B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$59.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
75.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.4 pp
WACC 12.4%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
172 days
27 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥109.03
1D-4.9%
1W-14.2%
1M-38.8%
3M-8.3%
6M+9.9%
YTD+66.2%
1Y+84.9%
ATR %11.5%
52w lowhigh58.4% off high

What Sinomag Technology does

Anhui maker of permanent ferrite magnet tiles used mostly in automotive motors, with plants in China and Vietnam.

Sells wet-pressed ferrite magnet tiles, the curved magnets inside small motors, with most volume going to automotive motors for starters, wipers, windows and seats. Output comes from Anhui and a Vietnam base, where a second phase adds its own pre-sintered powder, the magnet raw material. It is extending into soft ferrite cores and inductors.

Products and services

  • Wet-pressed permanent ferrite magnet tiles
  • Ferrite pre-sintered powder (planned in Vietnam)
  • Soft ferrite cores and inductors (new)

Customers

  • Automotive motor makers (starter, wiper, window, s
  • Other small-motor makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Magnetic materials
  • Permanent ferrite magnet tiles

What could go right

  • Vietnam second phase adds tiles and own pre-sintered powder
  • Move into soft ferrite and inductors

What could go wrong

  • Automotive motor demand cycles
  • Raw-material costs and ferrite price competition

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Automotive-grade motor magnets need long customer qualification and tight tolerances; ferrite is otherwise a competitive commodity.

Headquarters: Lujiang, China · Employees: 2,237

Named competitors

Sinomag Technology at a glance

Size Sinomag Technology (300835.SZ) is a China Information Technology company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $2.54B, the 1019th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥109.03 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 9.9%, against -26.8% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 17.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +14.0%); the operating margin is 6.3% (peer median 6.1%).

Valuation It trades at 75.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 27.9× (4th most expensive of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.4 points below its cost of capital (12.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 27 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015020025011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026300835.SZ 104Peer median 75
Six months, rebased to 100: Sinomag Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sinomag Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥1.48BCN¥1.29BCN¥1.16BCN¥1.06BCN¥921M
Revenue growth—+11%+9%+15%—
Gross profitCN¥444MCN¥356MCN¥312MCN¥284MCN¥240M
EBITDAn/aCN¥250MCN¥217MCN¥178MCN¥147M
Net incomeCN¥143MCN¥168MCN¥111MCN¥73.9MCN¥105M
Free cash flow-CN¥156M-CN¥122MCN¥44.6M-CN¥96.3M-CN¥215M
Capital expenditureCN¥196MCN¥233MCN¥154MCN¥134MCN¥231M
Total debtCN¥724MCN¥967MCN¥837MCN¥739MCN¥463M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sinomag Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%AXTI03422068836230148661960028595214VECO349167700024022354300657EXENS688686BHE002925002456300083000032300835.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sinomag Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%50×100×AXTI68836230148661960028595214VECO349167700024022354300657EXENS688686BHE002925300083000032300835.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sinomag Technology is the large dot.

Sinomag Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (300835.SZ vs 002056.SZ vs 6762.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sinomag Technology 300835.SZ$2.54B+10%+18%6%75.2×n/a
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics 002056.SZ$4.16B-9%+3%7%14.5×n/a
Tdk 6762.T$25.4B-27%+25%10%15.0×18.2%

How Sinomag Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sinomag Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300835.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-38.8%-16.6%4th lowest of 21
6-month return+9.9%-26.8%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-58.4%-50.2%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+17.9%+14.0%10th highest of 21
Operating margin6.3%6.1%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E75.2×27.9×4th most expensive of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.4 pp-2.8 pp6th lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sinomag Technology 300835.SZChina$2.54B+10%+18%6%75.2×n/an/a
AXT AXTIUnited States$2.55B-67%+89%20%16.2×n/an/a
LG Display 034220.KSSouth Korea$2.61B-42%-7%2%n/a-13.4%+1.2%
Forehope Electronic (Ningbo) 688362.SSChina$2.67B-19%+19%0%86.7×n/an/a
Shenzhen Zesum Technology 301486.SZChina$2.41B-42%+57%3%99.2×n/an/a
Marketech International 6196.TWTaiwan$2.68B+8%+44%7%13.0×6.3%+15.5%
Zhejiang Jiemei Electronic & Technology 002859.SZChina$2.71B-21%+26%13%47.3×n/an/a
Nippon Electric Glass 5214.TJapan$2.32B-44%+3%8%22.6×2.4%+5.1%
VECO VECOUnited States$2.27B-37%-3%4%13.3×37.1%+7.9%
Universal Microwave Technology 3491.TWOTaiwan$2.26B-36%+36%27%42.9×n/an/a
Alps Alpine 6770.TJapan$2.23B-24%+5%3%10.8×-3.8%+7.3%
Shenzhen H&T Intelligent Control 002402.SZChina$2.23B-49%+2%6%41.3×n/an/a
Foxconn Technology 2354.TWTaiwan$2.23B-11%+13%2%13.3×n/an/a
XiaMen HongXin Electron-tech 300657.SZChina$2.21B-18%+4%8%28.2×n/an/a
Exosens EXENS.PAFrance$2.95B-11%+15%17%27.5×24.3%+25.6%
OPT Machine Vision Tech 688686.SSChina$2.96B+48%+38%12%75.4×n/an/a
Benchmark Electronics BHEUnited States$2.16B-29%+13%4%17.7×13.8%+5.3%
Xiamen Intretech 002925.SZChina$2.16B-3%+39%9%32.1×n/an/a
OFILM 002456.SZChina$3.10B-35%-17%-1%n/a27.0%-14.4%
Guangdong Create Century Intelligent Equipment 300083.SZChina$3.13B+7%+35%11%24.4×n/an/a
Shenzhen SED Industry 000032.SZChina$2.03B-36%+5%1%42.9×7.0%+8.9%

Questions

Who are Sinomag Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Hengdian Group DMEGC (002056.SZ), TDK (6762.T), Proterial (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes AXT (AXTI), LG Display (034220.KS), Forehope Electronic (Ningbo) (688362.SS), Shenzhen Zesum Technology (301486.SZ), Marketech International (6196.TW), Zhejiang Jiemei Electronic & Technology (002859.SZ).
Is Sinomag Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 75.2× against a peer median of 27.9×, 4th most expensive of 19 in its peer set.
How has Sinomag Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +9.9% against -26.8% for the median peer; over one year +84.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.