Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › AMBER.NS Amber Enterprises IndiaOpen in the cockpit ↗

Amber Enterprises IndiaAMBER.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Capital Goods›Industrial Machinery

India's largest contract manufacturer (ODM/OEM) of air conditioners and components for brands like LG, Voltas and Daikin.

≈ India's Foxconn for room air conditionersMomentum laggard 16
Mkt cap
$2.39B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
61%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
59.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.1 pp
WACC 12.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · INR₹6,403
1D-2.8%
1W+9.2%
1M-7.5%
3M-13.8%
6M-27.6%
YTD+0.2%
1Y-20.8%
ATR %3.5%
Beta1.24
52w lowhigh28.6% off high

What Amber Enterprises India does

India's largest contract manufacturer (ODM/OEM) of air conditioners and components for brands like LG, Voltas and Daikin.

Builds air conditioners to brands' designs and specifications, and the brands sell them, so sales follow those brands' orders, which peak ahead of the Indian summer. It has widened beyond room air conditioners into components, circuit boards and railway products, which add value per sale.

In one line: India's Foxconn for room air conditioners.

Products and services

  • Room air conditioners (ODM/OEM)
  • AC components (heat exchangers, PCBs)
  • Electronics manufacturing (mobiles, EV components)

Customers

  • LG, Voltas, Daikin, Panasonic (brand owners)
  • Electronics/EV OEMs (diversification)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electronics manufacturing services
  • Room AC contract manufacturing
  • AC components & finished units

What could go right

  • Rising AC penetration/PLI scheme incentives
  • Diversification into EV and electronics manufacturing

What could go wrong

  • Customer/brand concentration
  • Thin contract-manufacturing margins

Moat: narrow (scale, customer qualification, cost advantage). Largest-scale AC contract manufacturer in India, deeply qualified with major brand customers.

Headquarters: Rajpura, India · Founded: 1990 · Employees: 21,000

Named competitors

Amber Enterprises India at a glance

Size Amber Enterprises India (AMBER.NS) is an India Industrials company (Industrial Machinery) with a market value of $2.39B, the 338th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹6,403 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 27.6%, against -20.6% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 14.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.8%); the operating margin is 5.1% (peer median 7.9%).

Valuation It trades at 59.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.4× (2nd most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.1 points below its cost of capital (12.3% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 78AMBER.NS 73
Six months, rebased to 100: Amber Enterprises India against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Amber Enterprises India financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹126B₹121B₹99.1B₹66.9B₹68.9B
Revenue growth—+22%+48%-3%—
Gross profit₹15.3B₹8.69B₹7.27B₹4.51B₹4.30B
EBITDA₹10.1B₹8.83B₹7.31B₹4.68B₹4.16B
Net income₹960M₹1.78B₹2.44B₹1.33B₹1.57B
Free cash flown/a-₹12.5B-₹155M₹4.36B-₹4.20B
Capital expendituren/a₹12.9B₹5.75B₹4.12B₹6.62B
Total debtn/a₹27.0B₹20.6B₹15.4B₹14.6B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Amber Enterprises India competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-40%-20%0%+20%603638240810108490MTRS45491056316368TIMKEN6003532285002975002611KALMAR61876141000009CECO688516603626JUN3AMBER.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Amber Enterprises India is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×60×603638240810MTRS56316368TIMKEN6003532285002975002611KALMAR61876141CECO688516603626JUN3AMBER.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Amber Enterprises India is the large dot.

Amber Enterprises India competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AMBER.NS vs DIXON.NS vs PGEL.NS vs KAYNES.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Amber Enterprises India AMBER.NS$2.39B-28%+15%5%59.6×n/a
Dixon Technologies (India) DIXON.NS$8.16B+14%+21%2%76.9×48.0%
PG Electroplast PGEL.NS$1.65B+2%+21%6%49.3×n/a
Kaynes Technology India KAYNES.NS$2.30B-26%+35%12%55.5×n/a
Syrma SGS Technology SYRMA.NS$2.97B+33%+62%10%63.2×33.7%

How Amber Enterprises India compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Amber Enterprises India against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAMBER.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.5%-6.6%11th highest of 21
6-month return-27.6%-20.6%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-28.6%-42.3%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+14.6%+9.8%9th highest of 21
Operating margin5.1%7.9%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E59.6×23.4×2nd most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.1 pp-0.2 pp8th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA22.4×11.5×5th most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA1.4×-0.0×4th most indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Amber Enterprises India AMBER.NSIndia$2.39B-28%+15%5%59.6×n/an/a
Yantai Eddie Precision Machinery 603638.SSChina$2.38B-22%+35%16%28.8×15.1%+7.3%
Wonik IPS 240810.KSSouth Korea$2.39B-43%+9%8%14.7×29.4%-3.6%
ROBOTIS 108490.KSSouth Korea$2.37B-30%+52%-16%n/an/an/a
Munters MTRS.STSweden$2.40B-34%0%9%26.2×12.4%+16.0%
Doosan Robotics 454910.KSSouth Korea$2.41B-54%+97%-91%n/an/an/a
Japan Steel Works 5631.TJapan$2.41B-46%-1%10%17.0×n/an/a
Organo 6368.TJapan$2.36B-14%+10%19%12.1×12.8%+12.0%
Timken India TIMKEN.NSIndia$2.43B-12%+19%16%46.1×36.2%+19.8%
Chengdu Xuguang Electronics 600353.SSChina$2.32B+8%+13%7%64.5×53.1%+12.8%
Chervon 2285.HKHong Kong$2.32B+103%-6%8%15.7×12.1%+6.4%
Zhuhai Bojay Electronics 002975.SZChina$2.32B-13%+71%18%41.2×34.2%+6.0%
Guangdong Dongfang Precision Science & Technology 002611.SZChina$2.50B-19%-16%8%20.2×17.8%+12.4%
Kalmar KALMAR.HEFinland$2.27B-7%+7%12%13.6×-4.8%-3.6%
All Ring Tech 6187.TWOTaiwan$2.52B-36%+1%29%25.0×26.4%+28.9%
Dmg Mori 6141.TJapan$2.53B-13%+20%4%23.5×12.9%+9.4%
China Baoan 000009.SZChina$2.56B-23%+26%7%n/an/an/a
CECO Environmental CECOUnited States$2.56B-47%+38%6%16.5×n/an/a
Wuxi Autowell Technology 688516.SSChina$2.22B-42%-14%8%23.4×n/an/a
Kunshan Kersen Science & Technology 603626.SSChina$2.22B+7%-24%-22%31.3×n/an/a
Jungheinrich AG Pref JUN3.DEGermany$2.58B-12%+2%5%10.3×-0.4%+7.6%

Questions

Who are Amber Enterprises India's main competitors?
Named competitors: Dixon Technologies (DIXON.NS), PG Electroplast (PGEL.NS), Epack Durable (private or unlisted), Kaynes Technology (KAYNES.NS), Syrma SGS Technology (SYRMA.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Yantai Eddie Precision Machinery (603638.SS), Wonik IPS (240810.KS), ROBOTIS (108490.KS), Munters (MTRS.ST), Doosan Robotics (454910.KS), Japan Steel Works (5631.T).
Is Amber Enterprises India expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 59.6× against a peer median of 23.4×, 2nd most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has Amber Enterprises India stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -27.6% against -20.6% for the median peer; over one year -20.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.