Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › SYRMA.NS Syrma SGS TechnologyOpen in the cockpit ↗

Syrma SGS TechnologySYRMA.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Capital Goods›Electronic Production Equipment

Chennai EMS maker of PCB assemblies, RFID tags and automotive electronics for global OEMs.

≈ A small, diversified Indian JabilMomentum strong 77
Mkt cap
$2.97B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
40%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
63.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.8 pp
WACC 10.6%
Hurdle
-28 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
96 days
10 Feb 2027
Close · INR₹1,459
1D-3.7%
1W-10.2%
1M-16.4%
3M+2.9%
6M+33.5%
YTD+99.0%
1Y+77.3%
ATR %5.5%
Beta1.07
52w lowhigh19.9% off high

What Syrma SGS Technology does

Chennai EMS maker of PCB assemblies, RFID tags and automotive electronics for global OEMs.

Is paid to build circuit boards and finished devices to customers' designs, with component costs largely passed through, so revenue is large relative to margin. Its name reflects the combination of Syrma and SGS Tekniks.

In one line: A small, diversified Indian Jabil.

Products and services

  • PCB assembly (PCBA)
  • Automotive electronics
  • RFID tags & readers
  • Consumer electronics EMS
  • Industrial & healthcare EMS

Customers

  • Global OEMs across 20+ countries
  • North India automotive Tier-1s
  • Consumer electronics brands
  • Industrial customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electronics manufacturing services
  • PCB assembly & box-build
  • RFID, automotive & consumer electronics

What could go right

  • China+1 supply-chain diversification
  • PLI-driven EMS demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Customer and order concentration
  • Thin, competitive EMS margins

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, scale, process know-how). 18 facilities and long design-to-manufacture OEM ties, but EMS stays a low-margin business.

Headquarters: Chennai, India · Employees: 10,046

Named competitors

Syrma SGS Technology at a glance

Size Syrma SGS Technology (SYRMA.NS) is an India Industrials company (Electronic Production Equipment) with a market value of $2.97B, the 285th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹1,459 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 33.5%, against +2.0% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 62.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +34.9%); the operating margin is 9.5% (peer median 9.5%).

Valuation It trades at 63.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 64.8× (4th cheapest of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 34% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +62%, so the hurdle is -28 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.8 points above its cost of capital (10.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026SYRMA.NS 133Peer median 103
Six months, rebased to 100: Syrma SGS Technology against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Syrma SGS Technology financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹63.1B₹48.2B₹37.9B₹31.5B₹20.5B
Revenue growth—+27%+20%+54%—
Gross profit₹11.8B₹6.80B₹3.86B₹2.68B₹2.46B
EBITDA₹6.88B₹5.84B₹3.04B₹2.05B₹1.94B
Net income₹4.21B₹3.18B₹1.70B₹1.07B₹1.19B
Free cash flown/a₹854M-₹945M-₹4.34B-₹1.72B
Capital expendituren/a₹1.92B₹2.45B₹3.38B₹1.18B
Total debt₹8.07B₹4.00B₹6.65B₹6.30B₹3.75B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Syrma SGS Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%0%KAYNESDATAPATTNS066970PGELAPOLLOAVALONDIXONSYRMA.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Syrma SGS Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+20%+40%+60%+80%60×80×KAYNESDATAPATTNSPGELAPOLLOAVALONDIXONSYRMA.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Syrma SGS Technology is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

+40%+50%+60%40%50%60%DATAPATTNSDIXONSYRMA.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Syrma SGS Technology is the large dot.

Syrma SGS Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SYRMA.NS vs DIXON.NS vs KAYNES.NS vs AMBER.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Syrma SGS Technology SYRMA.NS$2.97B+33%+62%10%63.2×33.7%
Dixon Technologies (India) DIXON.NS$8.16B+14%+21%2%76.9×48.0%
Kaynes Technology India KAYNES.NS$2.30B-26%+35%12%55.5×n/a
Amber Enterprises India AMBER.NS$2.39B-28%+15%5%59.6×n/a
Avalon Technologies AVALON.NS$1.34B+51%+44%10%69.4×n/a
Cyient DLM CYIENTDLM.NS$649M+82%-2%7%73.3×58.4%

How Syrma SGS Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Syrma SGS Technology against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSYRMA.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-16.4%-3.9%3rd lowest of 8
6-month return+33.5%+2.0%2nd highest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-19.9%-24.6%3rd highest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+62.4%+34.9%3rd highest of 8
Operating margin9.5%9.5%4th highest of 8
Forward P/E63.2×64.8×4th cheapest of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)33.7%n/a—
Growth delivered (Del g)+61.8%n/a—
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-28.1 ppn/a—
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.8 pp-4.6 pp2nd highest of 8
EV / EBITDA40.9×45.9×4th cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×0.3×2nd least indebted of 8

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Syrma SGS Technology SYRMA.NSIndia$2.97B+33%+62%10%63.2×33.7%+61.8%
Kaynes Technology India KAYNES.NSIndia$2.30B-26%+35%12%55.5×n/an/a
Data Patterns (India) DATAPATTNS.NSIndia$2.24B-11%+34%37%60.2×61.0%+32.8%
L&F 066970.KSSouth Korea$2.15B-62%+81%8%n/an/an/a
PG Electroplast PGEL.NSIndia$1.65B+2%+21%6%49.3×n/an/a
Apollo Micro Systems APOLLO.NSIndia$1.63B+32%+77%21%92.7×n/an/a
Avalon Technologies AVALON.NSIndia$1.34B+51%+44%10%69.4×n/an/a
Dixon Technologies (India) DIXON.NSIndia$8.16B+14%+21%2%76.9×48.0%+49.7%

Questions

Who are Syrma SGS Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Dixon Technologies (DIXON.NS), Kaynes Technology India (KAYNES.NS), Amber Enterprises India (AMBER.NS), Avalon Technologies (AVALON.NS), Cyient DLM (CYIENTDLM.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Kaynes Technology India (KAYNES.NS), Data Patterns (India) (DATAPATTNS.NS), L&F (066970.KS), PG Electroplast (PGEL.NS), Apollo Micro Systems (APOLLO.NS), Avalon Technologies (AVALON.NS).
Is Syrma SGS Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 63.2× against a peer median of 64.8×, 4th cheapest of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 34% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +62%, so the hurdle is -28 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Syrma SGS Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +33.5% against +2.0% for the median peer; over one year +77.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.